Galloway Won't Go Away

wulfie68

Council Member
Mar 29, 2009
2,014
24
38
Calgary, AB
By rights there shouldn't be a judge in the country who would hear this case: his own televised and admitted actions come to odds with what the Canadian government defines as support of terrorism. It should be recognized as spurious and summarily dismissed... but you just know there's going to be some judge with an axe to grind that will waste his court's time in hearing it...
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
LOL. what's the matter, if the case is so strong you should relish that the courts will be hearing it. That what the courts are for
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
LOL. what's the matter, if the case is so strong you should relish that the courts will be hearing it. That what the courts are for


You have it backwards..... the mouthpiece from Scotland has a weak case, and thusly the Canadian courts should'nt even give it the time of day.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
LOL. what's the matter, if the case is so strong you should relish that the courts will be hearing it. That what the courts are for

Linear thought anyone?

Hamas sends people into Israel with bombs strapped to them, to blow themselves up in areas crowded with civilians.

That is the very essence of terrorism.

Galloway handed over not only humanitarian aid, but cash to Hamas.

Therefore Galloway supports terrorism.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
LOL. what's the matter, if the case is so strong you should relish that the courts will be hearing it.

I have no problem having this go before the courts and having this bozo publicly humiliated. I do have a problem paying for it. Noodlenuts should have to put up a bond (maybe his friends at Hamas would give him the cash). Once he loses, that money can be used to offset the costs to the Canadian tax payers associated with this lawsuit. That way, we can publicly humiliate him and his ideas and hurt Hamas in one fell swoop.

Of course, none of that has anything to do with him being a media wh ore.
 

wulfie68

Council Member
Mar 29, 2009
2,014
24
38
Calgary, AB
LOL. what's the matter, if the case is so strong you should relish that the courts will be hearing it. That what the courts are for

The case is non-existant and a waste our court time and taxpayer dollars.

You have to put this in focus: by the nature of our legal system this case is about one specific issue. It can not be about whether or not Hamas should be on Canada's list of terrorist organizations but whether Galloway supported an organization on that list, which he has. It amounts to another publicity stunt at our expense.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Linear thought anyone?

Hamas sends people into Israel with bombs strapped to them, to blow themselves up in areas crowded with civilians.

That is the very essence of terrorism.

Galloway handed over not only humanitarian aid, but cash to Hamas.

Therefore Galloway supports terrorism.

Technically, Galloway never gave any cash or even humanitarian aid to Hamas. He was at most a participant in a humanitarian aid convoy which was a registered charity. He is not on the charity's organizations board of directors, and had no authority to handle cash.

Therefore, these people better apologize for their defamatory remarks they made in ignorance of Galloway's relationship to this charitable organization. Otherwise as a sitting MP, he has the backing of the British government to pay for lawyers....

I'm looking forward to the court case. At a minimum it should prove entertaining and raise Canadian awareness of Israel's ongoing war crimes and crimes against humanity which triggered this humanitarian aid convoy.

Please keep this string civil
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
You have it backwards..... the mouthpiece from Scotland has a weak case, and thusly the Canadian courts should'nt even give it the time of day.
The courts would decide how strong the case is, not you. You just two signs , one saying the courts are righteous and the other saying how corrupt and pussy whipped the Judges are for the decision that is not what you want.

Hamas sends people into Israel with bombs strapped to them, to blow themselves up in areas crowded with civilians.
That is the very essence of terrorism.
Galloway handed over not only humanitarian aid, but cash to Hamas.
Therefore Galloway supports terrorism.
And a bomb strapped to the belly of a F-15 that takes out many civilians is what? Declaring a UN School a safe-zone for women and kids and then bombing it is what?
Canada has already declared to the world whose tit she is sucking.

I have no problem having this go before the courts and having this bozo publicly humiliated.
Then let it and be quiet about it till the case is decided one way or the other.


Different tit but it clearly shows Canada cannot decide even on the little things, lol.

(in part)
The Bush administration formally refused the Canadian government's request to remove Maher Arar from a terrorist watch list. In 2002, Arar was en route to Canada when he was detained by U.S. officials in New York and sent to Syria, where he was imprisoned for more than a year and endured severe beatings.
At the time, Arar, a Syrian-born software engineer, was living in Ottawa, Canada. Maria LaHood, one of Arar's attorneys, says her client is a victim of extraordinary rendition — where terrorism suspects are sent to third countries for interrogation.
An exhaustive investigation by Canadian officials found that Arar had no terrorist ties; he has been completely cleared by the Canadian government.



U.S. Denies Canada's Terror Watch-List Request : NPR
 
Last edited:

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
The case is non-existant and a waste our court time and taxpayer dollars.

You have to put this in focus: by the nature of our legal system this case is about one specific issue. It can not be about whether or not Hamas should be on Canada's list of terrorist organizations but whether Galloway supported an organization on that list, which he has. It amounts to another publicity stunt at our expense.

I agree its a publicity stunt. But Kenny and the JDL created the opportunity. Galloway is hardly one to ignore chance to point out hypocrisy and ignorance.

Neither am I.

Just in case you don't know who Galloway is, here are my favorite Galloway youtube clips:

Galloway vs SkyNet Re: Israel's 2006 war in Lebanon
YouTube - Galloway Lebanon

Galloway vs the US Senate Re: Iraq oil trading Part 1
YouTube - George Galloway at the US Senate Part 1

Galloway vs the US Senate Re: Iraq oil trading Part 2
YouTube - George Galloway at the US Senate Part 2

Also the speech the Canadian government and the JDL did not want Canadians to hear:
YouTube - The banned speech (1 of 5). George Galloway addresses Canada by way of video. March 30, 2009.
YouTube - The banned speech (2 of 5). George Galloway addresses Canada by way of video. March 30, 2009.
YouTube - The banned speech (3 of 5). George Galloway addresses Canada by way of video. March 30, 2009.
YouTube - The banned speech (4 of 5). George Galloway addresses Canada by way of video, March 30, 2009.
YouTube - The banned speech (5 of 5). George Galloway addresses Canada by way of video on March 30, 2009.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Btw, I attended the Galloway event in Mississauga and it would have been better to meet Galloway in person. The JDL were successful in reducing the power of his message, but they made up for it by giving him national news coverage for several days.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
The case is non-existant and a waste our court time and taxpayer dollars.
Not really, keeping the First Nations tied up in the courts at a cost of over $100M and taking 20 years to define Treaty issues is a waste of the courts time and a waste of taxpayer money.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Not really, keeping the First Nations tied up in the courts at a cost of over $100M and taking 20 years to define Treaty issues is a waste of the courts time and a waste of taxpayer money.


and that, has nothing to do with some big mouthed foreigner wasting our courts time.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
No, not if my tax dollars are being used.
Yes. They are the ones who actually have the voice in this matter, what you have to say is most likely unimportant and if it were you would be called to testify, as it is the courts do not want you speaking for or to them.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
Yes. They are the ones who actually have the voice in this matter, what you have to say is most likely unimportant and if it were you would be called to testify, as it is the courts do not want you speaking for or to them.

I expect to be called to testify. That has no bearing on whether or not taxpayers should foot the bill for this fiasco.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
That's a valid point, why did the Israeli lobbyists open their mouth in the first place, Canada should send them the court's bill.

Why? He's suing more than just some Israeli lobbyist.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Probably because they instigated the ban.
George Galloway banned from Canada | Politics | guardian.co.uk
"His proposed visit prompted the Jewish Defence League of Canada to write an open letter to the country's government urging it to do "everything possible to keep this hater away"."


Which, as Canadian citizens, they have every right to do. It is not up to them or any other citizen as to who can and can not enter Canada. If it was, then GW Bush would not have been allowed into Canada as there was an even bigger uproar when it was found out he was coming here.

Immigration Canada made the decision and was supported by the Minister in Charge. Now poor Georgie is pulling a temper tantrum.