The Ultimate Con The Ultimate Con is a 9/11 based documentary with no narration, no script, no conjecture. There are no “theories” put forth in this documentary, only facts, eyewitness testimony, news reports, interviews, and various other clips that are combined together to tell a story. The Ultimate Con is 100% free. It is not for sale in any retail outlet or book store anywhere. It is more important to get the word out to every single person possible while we still have the chance. This documentary is the very best documentary for people who are unfamiliar with the controversy surrounding 9/11, or people teetering on the edge of finding out the truth. The documentary was designed specially for those who still believe the “Official” story, to best wake them up using various media and news clips.Quote has been trimmed, See full post:
I created The Ultimate Con documentary to help wake up fellow Americans and people from around the globe to the lies that we have been told about that fateful day. I created The Ultimate Con for the victims, the victim’s families, the soldiers, and the various other innocent people who have become the victims of the wrath set forth by America’s military industrial complex. (Excerpt from theultimateconspiracy.com)
Building 7 was heavily impacted by debris falling from the north tower. It took major damage to its southwest corner from the ground up to a little below its middle floors, and the south face was also heavily damaged, though it's hard to get a good look at it because of obscuring smoke and dust. There was an intense fire involving several lower floors, visible from all four sides of the building, that was left to burn for over six hours because the rescue crews were focusing on finding survivors and minimal fire fighting equipment was available. Major structural damage from thousands of tons of debris falling directly onto the building from hundreds of feet above, plus an uncontrolled 6+ hour fire, adequately explains Building 7's collapse.
Building 7 was heavily impacted by debris falling from the north tower
Ask yourselves. Were the buildings demolished? Did you see them pulverized right before your eyes and then crash to the ground in ten seconds? Did you see those things? Now look at any video of a professional demolition of a large building and you see the exact same action.
There is absolutely no reason whatever to suspect anything other than professional purposeful demolition and all the normal steps that would have to be taken.
um....no I don't. That's the point the conspiracy nutters can't seem to grasp. Repeating over and over again that they look the same doesn't mean they look the same. As Dexter pointed out, controlled demolitions collapse from the bottom up.
I was going to say that there is absolutely no reason whatever to suspect a professional purposeful demolition but then it occurred to me that there was the insanity angle as well as the stupidity angle. It's quite clear that those that buy into the controlled demolition are either incredibly simple or incredibly unstable.
As I've said in the past, I'm a very open minded person and am willing to entertain the idea that there was a conspiracy. All I ask is for some credible evidence. Showing demolition videos that look nothing like the WTC and claiming this as proof is just beyond laughable.
Ah yes, eye witness testimony. The only thing more confusing than the intellectual rubbish spewed by the CT crowd is the eyewitness accounts.
...rambling.... when the pentagon was hit WHY were all the video tapes confiscated
this would of proved without doubt that a plane hit the pentagon yet the footage was NEVER released was it.
you're all the same you got you're opinion and nothing will change you're mind
You're the second person too call me Quandary 121 they must of been quite some person for you all to show such animosity towards them I'm starting to admire this Quandary 121,and for you to say that i have posted the same ole same ole shows how very backwards you must be
Here we go when you cant answer the question civilly resort to calling them a CT nutter that always works
OMG what a sad moron you are look if it was a crime scene as you say who were all the guys walking around picking up debris,and do you remember that big box covered in a blue tarp being carried away .?
I wonder what was under that and who were they certainly did not look like cops to me they looked like pentagon staff ,i know its all a bit too much for your week mind to take in don't worry im sure if you up you're meds nothing will ever bother you again
Dexter Sinister watch this the fires were small
Considering the attitude you've displayed in your recent posts in this thread, it'll be a frosty day in Hell before I'll take instructions or advice from you. That's not the way to convince anyone, you just shred your own credibility by coming on like such a dick.
YouTube - HOW DID WORLD TRADE CENTER 7 FALL
Dexter Sinister watch this the fires were small
Here are some punctuation marks. Please use them.
Do you actually have any evidence? I mean real evidence.
NEW INFORMATION ON THE DEATH OF 911 EYEWITNESS BARRY JENNINGS SEEMS TO POINT TO FOUL PLAYQuote has been trimmed
April 16, 2009 | 1comment | Evidence of Explosives used on 911
NEW INFORMATION ON THE DEATH OF 911 EYEWITNESS BARRY JENNINGS SEEMS TO POINT TO FOUL PLAY
By Jack Blood
Welcome To American Freedom Radio
Deadline Live with Jack Blood
<object width=”480″ height=”385″><param name=”movie” value=”http://www.youtube.com/p/C051F6E7E399834F&hl=en&fs=1″></param><param name=”allowFullScreen” value=”true”></param><param name=”allowscriptaccess” value=”always”></param><embed src=”http://www.youtube.com/p/C051F6E7E399834F&hl=en&fs=1″ type=”application/x-shockwave-flash”...
What are the Goals in the 9/11 Truth Community?Quote has been trimmed
What is the Goal in the 9/11 Truth Community? Debates, or Justice?
Steven E. Jones
December 22, 2006 (updated Jan. 9, 2007) Consider this statement made a few weeks ago by Dr. Frank Legge, Kevin Ryan, Victoria Ashley and other (previous) members of Scholars for 9/11 Truth: "Further, on the Scholars' web site, positions are being promoted which are disputed by the scientists specializing in physical sciences from Scholars For 9/11 Truth. Attempts to correct this situation have failed. As of this date the web site continues to promote assertions which are unsupported by the evidence (ray-beams from space caused the demolitions, mini-nukes were used in the WTC towers, real commercial jets did not hit the WTC towers, etc.). We feel that the promotion of these ideas functions to distract from and discredit much of the other basic strong material challenging the official story of 9/11 which already exists - the stand down, the war games, the insider trading, the many strong points of evidence on the demolitions, etc."
How do we determine if ray-beams from space or mini-nuclear bombs were responsible for bringing down the WTC Towers? How do we know whether jets actually hit the Towers?
While it is admittedly exciting to come up with fascinating new theories about 9/11, if we wish to bring the...
My colleagues and I are pursuing the thermate data as strong evidence for foul-play, and I encourage researchers to pursue all worthwhile areas of inquiry. One person can hardly pursue every line of inquiry, but I'm confident that one of these lines (above) will bear fruit in getting us to a serious, evidence-based investigation that leaves no stone unturned.Quote has been trimmed
In contrast the theory that no planes hit the towers does no stand up to scrutiny, as published in a peer-reviewed paper by Eric Salter, here: journalof911studies.com/v...Salter.pdf Salter shows that evidence for real planes hitting the Towers is compelling
Papers regarding the following notions have been or are being prepared for the new Letters section of the Journal of 9/11 Studies: Mini-nukes exploding in the Towers on 9/11; Ray-beams used to bring the Towers down; comments/questions regarding papers by Reynolds and Wood. I anticipate and welcome questions regarding my published papers also. The editors of the Journal of 9/11 Studies invite questions and answers in the Letters section, as a means to bring the debate to a civilized, scientific forum. In Newton's day, there were various verbal attacks and debates among scientists, including attacks against Newton by Gottfried Leibniz and Robert Hooke. Considerable order was brought to the scientific community by requiring that articles and letters be published in peer-reviewed journals, so...
He didn't say the fires were small, he said they were intense.