Mother sets fire to her daughter's gloating rapist

Scott Free

House Member
May 9, 2007
3,893
46
48
BC
Mother sets fire to her daughter's gloating rapist


A Spanish mother has taken revenge on the man who raped her 13-year-old daughter at knifepoint by dousing him in petrol and setting him alight. He died of his injuries in hospital on Friday.

Antonio Cosme Velasco Soriano, 69, had been sent to jail for nine years in 1998, but was let out on a three-day pass and returned to his home town of Benejúzar, 30 miles south of Alicante, on the Costa Blanca.

While there, he passed his victim's mother in the street and allegedly taunted her about the attack. He is said to have called out "How's your daughter?", before heading into a crowded bar.

Shortly after, the woman walked into the bar, poured a bottle of petrol over Soriano and lit a match. She watched as the flames engulfed him, before walking out.

The woman fled to Alicante, where she was arrested the same evening. When she appeared in court the next day in the town of Orihuela, she was cheered and clapped by a crowd, who shouted "Bravo!" and "Well done!"

A judge ordered her to be held in prison and undergo psychiatric tests, provoking anger from friends and neighbours, who have set up a petition calling for her release.

Soriano suffered 60 per cent burns in the attack on June 13 and was airlifted to a specialist unit. He survived for 11 days before succumbing to his injuries.

It is understood that the woman, who cannot be named because of laws safeguarding the identity of rape victims, claims to have no recollection of the attack which took place in the Bar Mary, just 300 yards from the family home.

As decorators painted over the blackened walls of his bar last week, Antonio Ferrendez Lopez told how Soriano had walked in at lunchtime.

"The place was packed with people eating. I was sitting at a table and Soriano was standing at the bar very close to me when the woman walked in," he said. "She didn't acknowledge anyone but walked up to Soriano, who was drinking a coffee, put her hand on his shoulder and turned him round to face her.

"Then she pulled the bottle she was carrying from under her arm and began to tip it over him. At first I didn't realise what was happening, but then I smelt the petrol. I jumped up and tried to grab her, but when she struck a match I got clear.

"The petrol was in a pool around Soriano, and she threw the match into it. It ignited with a whoosh, and he screamed and staggered about covered in flames. As people rushed outside to escape the flames, she just looked at him, then turned and walked away."

Customers helped Mr Lopez put out the fire with extinguishers and doused Soriano with water until paramedics arrived.

Soriano's attack on the woman's teenage daughter took place in 1998. The girl was going to buy a loaf of bread when Soriano snatched her from the street, threatened her with a knife and raped her. Her mother is said to have suffered mental illness ever since.

Soriano was convicted of the rape and ordered to serve 13 years in jail. The sentence was later reduced to nine years on appeal.

The woman's lawyer, Joaquín Galant, told The Sunday Telegraph last night: "The family has suffered a double tragedy. First the attack on their daughter and now this. Both the father and his daughter would like to express their sadness at the death of Soriano."

Earlier, Mr Galant said that the woman did not deserve to be kept in prison. "For seven years she has been deeply affected by what was done to her daughter," he said. "This man, fresh from prison and asking how her daughter was, might be considered to have provoked her."


Source


Good for her!!!
 

shadowshiv

Dark Overlord
May 29, 2007
17,545
120
63
50
Vigilantism(real word?) is a tricky thing. On the one hand, he was a rapist that obviously felt no remorse about doing it and going so far as to taunt the mother. On the other hand, she could have hurt some other innocent people with the petrol if it had splashed on them.

No doubt her mental state at the time will determine if she gets sentenced to any prison time.

He should not have been allowed the day pass in the first place(which really doesn't have too much bearing on the particulars of the case, but I will say it anyhow), and should have done the entire sentence before being released. Karma is a funny thing sometimes.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
I don't agree with the death penalty. I don't agree with vigilantism.

But, looking at what happened here, it goes beyond vigilantism when a mother is confronted with her child's rapist, roaming free around town and inquiring about said child. It is simple defense imo, protect your child, and I doubt that she gave the incident a single scrap of rational thought.

I have seen a woman come unexpectedly face to face with a man who raped her as a child. I was the only one with her who knew what she'd seen at first, but the sheer panic and terror had everyone scooping her up and taking her away. Hubby nearly headed to the hospital with her the shock was so extreme. We were able to calm her down and get her home, just barely. I can't even fathom what would have happened had her mother been there.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
I don't agree with the death penalty. I don't agree with vigilantism.

But, looking at what happened here, it goes beyond vigilantism when a mother is confronted with her child's rapist, roaming free around town and inquiring about said child. It is simple defense imo, protect your child, and I doubt that she gave the incident a single scrap of rational thought.

I have seen a woman come unexpectedly face to face with a man who raped her as a child. I was the only one with her who knew what she'd seen at first, but the sheer panic and terror had everyone scooping her up and taking her away. Hubby nearly headed to the hospital with her the shock was so extreme. We were able to calm her down and get her home, just barely. I can't even fathom what would have happened had her mother been there.

That's just beautiful news, Karrie- the kid and all others are now safe from this derelict, no tax money wasted on a trial or incarceration, no lawyers, prosecution or defense getting rich plus it fits right in with my philosophy of cleaning up your own mess if you can before calling in outside help.
 

tracy

House Member
Nov 10, 2005
3,500
48
48
California
I'd feel a lot more sympathy had she not put all those innocent bystanders at risk. The fact that no one else was injured was simply good luck. She could have killed someone innocent.... Then I guess their family member would have been allowed to set her on fire to kill her? There is a reason this type of thing is against the law.
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
I'd feel a lot more sympathy had she not put all those innocent bystanders at risk. The fact that no one else was injured was simply good luck. She could have killed someone innocent.... Then I guess their family member would have been allowed to set her on fire to kill her? There is a reason this type of thing is against the law.

That I don't agree with. If we are going with that logic alot of laws should be different, negligence shouldn't actually have to harm someone to be a crime then.

I do definately think starting a fire is the wrong way to go though, despite the poetic justice it seems to convey.
 

tracy

House Member
Nov 10, 2005
3,500
48
48
California
That I don't agree with. If we are going with that logic alot of laws should be different, negligence shouldn't actually have to harm someone to be a crime then.

I do definately think starting a fire is the wrong way to go though, despite the poetic justice it seems to convey.


The bar owner said the place was packed. That makes what she did very dangerous. At the very least she committed arson. The bar no doubt had to close for a time and have damage repaired.
 

tracy

House Member
Nov 10, 2005
3,500
48
48
California
Plus, why does it have to cause harm? I thought that was the reason drunk driving was a crime (because you could easily kill innocent people). I've never heard the defense of "well, I didn't hurt anybody doing it so it shouldn't be a crime".
 

Diarygirl

Electoral Member
Oct 28, 2008
551
4
18
Newfoundland
I don't know what I would have done had I been the mother. It is such an awful experience for her having her daughter taken so aggressively by someone who had no respect for her or her feelings. I can imagine how it must have played on her mind for such a long time and something that she just couldn't deal with. I can't imagine how the daughter even managed to get through the nightmare!! I'd say that this is what the mother wanted in the regards of payback and did it, sacraficing herself for imprisionment. To her, it was worth going to prision for. She did what she wanted to do to get him back. He won't rape anyone else's daughter now, will he?
 

ANTRTC

New Member
Feb 21, 2009
2
0
1
Nanaimo, BC
Good Ridance

The average person feels helpless when you see the bad guy has no remorse. I use to deplore the acts of a vigilante. After seeing so much injustice first hand it changed my mind. If there is even a hint of closure for the victim of crime and fear on the mind of the bad guy that someone was figuring on leveling the playing field there might be some justice in the world. Screw the idea God will get even with the jerk when he goes to the great beyond. Vengeance is best served cold. It would be great for the jerks in the world to have a crink in their neck from looking over their shoulders. Hope she gets off with diminished capacity. As for the rapist too bad so sad.
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
Plus, why does it have to cause harm? I thought that was the reason drunk driving was a crime (because you could easily kill innocent people). I've never heard the defense of "well, I didn't hurt anybody doing it so it shouldn't be a crime".

I can agree with the view that it shouldn't have to actually cause harm. I think thats a very rational model, where intent not actions should matter.

But our laws are (by and large) structured with a very different model where you actually have to cause harm.

If I don't fasten something properly (and i've been trained to and explained the danger if I don't) and a 10 tonne beam of steel falls towards your head, its a crime if it splats you..but im off scot free if someone pushes you out of the way. At one point the law even read that I was off scot free if the beam killed the guy who pushed you out of the way, since he knowingly put himself into danger to push you away, and thus my actions had not harmed anyone who didn't choose to put themselves in danger.
 

tracy

House Member
Nov 10, 2005
3,500
48
48
California
Workplace laws are often very different. I suppose it's because few people want to go to work and put themselves at risk for criminal charges simply because of an unintentional screw up. You should see the port laws down here. Strictly no-fault. You could kill someone and it wouldn't cost you anything.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
I wonder where she got the gasoline. It was said that she poured a bottle of gas over the guy. In most countries they won't let you fill a glass container at the pumps so she must have filled her bottle from another container. This suggests planning and aforethought. I still think justice was served by killing this scumbag but there is more here than meets the eye.