Was it built the same way?
OK, so why didn't it collapse like the world trade centre buildings?
Any theories?
no explosives were involved in this!
jet fuel doesnt burn hot enough to melt steel
then there were the reports from emergency people about hearing and seeing explosions
but I dont want to hi- jack this thread mate
The steel didn't melt. Only the conspiracy flakes make that claim.
Confusion and conflicting reports are always a part of large disasters.
Then don't make silly little comments about explosives at the WTC. Leave that nonsense for the conspiracy minded circle jerks. The rest of us that want to deal in the science can discuss that aspect of it here.
go and read the thread....there were pools of molten metal in the basement weeks later.
I'm not, you are ;-)
OK, so why didn't it collapse like the world trade centre buildings?
Any theories?
there was no jet fuel or plane impact on wtc7
Any theories?No 767; no jet fuel; not built in the 1960s. That's my theory.