Beijing Skyscraper Fire
- Thread starter Scott Free
- Start date
I don't know. Building seven was just a regular old building.
Maybe the Chinese have better steel with a higher melting point?
The Chinese building and the WTC buildings were all made of steel, we can be sure of that just because of their height.
They weren't hit by a plane for starters. There were a number of things that lead to the collapse of the trade centers. Fire was but one of them.
Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation
It was not built in New York City where the Mob controls the construction trade where not all the building material was put into the building that's why it's not falling
Can you point me in the direction of some of the better WTC conspiracy sites. I need a good laugh today.
jet fuel doesnt burn hot enough to melt steel
then there were the reports from emergency people about hearing and seeing explosions
but I dont want to hi- jack this thread mate, so do yourself a favour and go to 9/11 truth manifesto thread
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/international-politics/70073-9-11-truth-manifesto.html
its all there.........
then there were the reports from emergency people about hearing and seeing explosions
but I dont want to hi- jack this thread mate, so do yourself a favour and go to 9/11 truth manifesto thread
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/international-politics/70073-9-11-truth-manifesto.html
its all there.........
The steel didn't melt. Only the conspiracy flakes make that claim.
Confusion and conflicting reports are always a part of large disasters.
Then don't make silly little comments about explosives at the WTC. Leave that nonsense for the conspiracy minded circle jerks. The rest of us that want to deal in the science can discuss that aspect of it here.
go and read the thread....there were pools of molten metal in the basement weeks later.
Please don't hi-jack this thread with conspiracy nonsense. Let's leave this one to those that lean toward science.
I'll ask again. Please take your conspiracy crap to your conspiracy thread. You have a thread. Leave this one for the scientific minds.
OK, so why didn't it collapse like the world trade centre buildings?
Any theories?
No 767; no jet fuel; not built in the 1960s. That's my theory.
:sad1:.......Geez, I hope "China" wasn't trapped in there, burning to a greasy little cinder.
I would sure hate to lose him and his many deep philosophical dissertations.
Has anyone seen him??
Anyone??
:-(
I would sure hate to lose him and his many deep philosophical dissertations.
Has anyone seen him??
Anyone??
:-(
No there wasn't but there was impact nonetheless. It also wasn't struck by a tidal wave nor did it suffer from crabs.
Quoting Scott Free
OK, so why didn't it collapse like the world trade centre buildings?
Healthy bamboo sticks .......that's my theory .
OK, so why didn't it collapse like the world trade centre buildings?
Healthy bamboo sticks .......that's my theory .
