"Those attacks were directly related to US forigne policy", not proper english, what you appear to be trying to say is, those attacks were US foreign policy and executed by the USA as a matter of policy. Who else exercises policy if not the originating nation and possibly a close and trusted allie and tradeing partner. Give it up , the sane world has reviewed the evidence and the accused nations and has concluded that the whole official story is a monumental lie. And that brings us to the poor deranged and frieghtened but faithfull specimin who insists that the worlds largest ever terrorist organization could not possibly have commited a self afflicting terrorist act of wanton murderous barbarity especially in the light of thier world class expertise and experiance in the field as demonstrated in several recent and historical zones of conflict. It boggles the mind how people cling to the certainty of civic and social infrastructure and the blind and dumb trust in justice and ethics that do not exist and are not exercised by the allegedly wounded party. We could be wrong but logic and common scence and the evidence say otherwise. Any objective study of the material clearly indicates that the facts and the official seeded story diverge at 180 degrees at speed. It's not you of course and it's not me, it's the axis of evil.