The world will end in 2060, according to Sir Isaac Newton

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,412
1,668
113
English scientist Sir Isaac Newton, who discovered gravity when an apple fell on his head as he sat under a tree (reputedly somewhere at Cambridge University and severeal trees there have been put forward as the tree's descendant), died in 1727. He predicted that the world will end in 2060.....

The world will end in 2060, according to Newton
18th June 2007
Daily Mail

Scientist Sir Isaac Newton predicted the world will end in 2060 after studying verses in the Bible's New Testament, according to a letter on show in public for the first time.

Newton, who died 280 years ago, is known for laying much of the groundwork for modern physics, astronomy, maths and optics.

But in a new Jerusalem exhibit, he appears as a scholar of deep faith who also found time to write on Jewish law - even penning a few phrases in careful Hebrew letters - and combing the Old Testament's Book of Daniel for clues about the world's end.


The document reveals that Newton predicted the world will end in 2060

The documents, purchased by a Jewish scholar at a Sotheby's auction in London in 1936, have been kept in safes at Israel's national library in Jerusalem since 1969. Available for decades only to a small number of scholars, they have never before been shown to the public.

In one manuscript from the early 1700s, Newton used the cryptic Book of Daniel to calculate the date for the Apocalypse, reaching the conclusion that the world would end no earlier than 2060.

"It may end later, but I see no reason for its ending sooner," Newton wrote.


The famous scientist

However, he added, "This I mention not to assert when the time of the end shall be, but to put a stop to the rash conjectures of fanciful men who are frequently predicting the time of the end, and by doing so bring the sacred prophesies into discredit as often as their predictions fail."

In another document, Newton interpreted biblical prophecies to mean that the Jews would return to the Holy Land before the world ends. The end of days will see "the ruin of the wicked nations, the end of weeping and of all troubles, the return of the Jews captivity and their setting up a flourishing and everlasting Kingdom," he posited.

The exhibit also includes treatises on daily practice in the Jewish temple in Jerusalem. In one document, Newton discussed the exact dimensions of the temple - its plans mirrored the arrangement of the cosmos, he believed - and sketched it. Another paper contains words in Hebrew, including a sentence taken from the Jewish prayerbook.

Yemima Ben-Menahem, one of the exhibit's curators, said the papers show Newton's conviction that important knowledge was hiding in ancient texts.

"He believed there was wisdom in the world that got lost. He thought it was coded, and that by studying things like the dimensions of the temple, he could decode it," she said.


The letter is on public display for the first time

The Newton papers, Ben-Menahem said, also complicate the idea that science is diametrically opposed to religion. "These documents show a scientist guided by religious fervor, by a desire to see God's actions in the world," she said.

More prosaic documents on display show Newton keeping track of his income and expenses while a scholar at Cambridge and later, as master of the Royal Mint, negotiating with a group of miners from Devon and Cornwall about the price of the tin they supplied to Queen Anne.

The archives of Hebrew University in Jerusalem include a 1940 letter from Albert Einstein to Abraham Shalom Yahuda, the collector who purchased the papers a year earlier.

Newton's religious writings, Einstein wrote, provide "a variety of sketches and ongoing changes that give us a most interesting look into the mental laboratory of this unique thinker."

dailymail.co.uk
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
The world could end long before then because of a lot of things. Somehow Isaac Newton digging it out of some Hebrew text doesn't get me excited. Can I sell you some gonnabe ocean-front property in Kamloops. With global warming ....maybe even Penticton.....:lol:
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
I second what Toro says, the party idea sounds awesome;)

Theres probably a date allready before this one, both will pass us by and there will be new calls for armagedden from the book of mormon, or the quaran, or some televangelist.
 
Last edited:

cortex

Electoral Member
Aug 3, 2006
418
2
18
hopelessly entagled
The only enduring legacy of Newton's was the concept of candy figs to cover the soft parts and the notion that its easier to poop in a universe with universal gravity than one where gardens are littered with free floating apples-worms and all.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
The apple falling on his head story probably isn't true, but Newton did make the connection between the force that makes the apple fall and the force that keeps the moon in orbit and figured out that they had to be the same thing. That happened while he was at home in Lincolnshire, not at Cambridge, which was closed at the time because of the Great Plague.

Newton was really more the last of the magicians than the first scientist in the modern sense. He devoted far more time and energy to scriptural analysis and alchemy than he did to science, though he did try to bring a rigorous scientific, experimental approach to them. He's the person who bridges the gap between magical thinking and the beginning of what we now call the scientific method. All reports I've seen indicate that he was an irascible SOB with only one friend in the world, Edmund Halley, who used Newton's work to calculate the orbit of the comet that bears his name. Newton had savage arguments with the Astronomer Royal at the time, Sir John Flamsteed, and with Liebnitz about the invention of calculus. He was extremely jealous and protective of his discoveries, and without Halley's urging and financial support he wouldn't have published his masterwork, the Principia. Not a nice man at all.

And he's no more likely to be right about the end of the world than anyone else has ever been. There was a poster here for a while calling himself alasdair who predicted it would be last April, for instance. Funny, he hasn't been around lately. Maybe the world ended for him last April.
 
  • Like
Reactions: daisygirl

gc

Electoral Member
May 9, 2006
931
20
18
"English scientist Sir Isaac Newton, who discovered gravity when an apple fell on his head as he sat under a tree (reputedly somewhere at Cambridge University and severeal trees there have been put forward as the tree's descendant), died in 1727"

As an interesting side note, completely unrelated to the topic, I just learned that UBC has some apple trees that are direct descendants of Newton's famous apple tree:

"But what many people may not know is that direct descendants of the same apples that inspired Newton to compose his theory of gravity in 1661, have been growing at UBC for almost 40 years"

Link (scroll down to 3rd page)
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
Hey Dex how's it goin..?:)

Yeah not only wasn't old Isaac a "nice guy" he was a womanizer and always in lots of trouble over money and picking cabbages in another mans cabbage patch...if you know what I mean..;)

Everything that has a beginning has an end.

Lucky for me as a Taoist I don't believe that the universe ever "began"...With all due respect to Stephen Hawking and a few others, I believe the universe has always existed and will always exist..whether there's pale apes who walk upright to invent television or not...
 

gc

Electoral Member
May 9, 2006
931
20
18
With all due respect to Stephen Hawking and a few others, I believe the universe has always existed and will always exist..whether there's pale apes who walk upright to invent television or not...

I don't believe that, because of this paradox. Imagine any event, for example me posting this message on this internet board. If I told you I was going to post this message in an infinite number of years from now, I might as well tell you I am never going to post this message, because it's always possible for more time to elapse. Now, take that and run the clock backwards an infinite number of years to a time an infinite number of years ago. If I had said then that I was going to post this message in an infinite number of years from then (which would be right now), again that means I am never going to post this message, and yet here I am posting it. Thus, the Universe (and time) can not have always existed, but I suppose it's possible to exist for an infinite number of years into the future.

I hope that's not too confusing, and sorry about getting off-topic, but I think it's an interesting topic.
 
May 28, 2007
3,866
67
48
Honour our Fallen
hawkins theory like Buddhist on time is such that time is so infinite that it turns unto itself and becomes a circle. Now that is not taking in account one or two big bang events.
I mean here is a bit of when the Buddha revealed he first attained Buddhahood. Which came as a shock to disciples thinking this was when he first attained enlightenment in our historic understanding of Buddha.

Ok this is definatly not word for word but i read it enough times in the Lotus Sutra to pretty much get it.

"If a man were to face east and were to have the entire universe in a sac over his shoulder and with each step he was to reach into that sac and take one particle of the universe and place it down with each step eastward.Take the amount of time it would take to empty the sac .Then multiply that time by an infinite amount of kalpas. (A kalpa is the amount of time it would take for a nymph to glide a silk scarf across a stone one foot square and wear it down to nothing).


Then after you have that multiply that figure by 45145 to the power of four , then start all over again and multyply an infinite amount of kalpas again and still you would not have come close to when I first attained Buddhaood."
So that was just The Buddha's enlightenment . You realize he was a common mortal like all of us forever as well before he 1st attained Buddhahood.......so this circle thing is really , really long.....
Interesting note here. i once asked a Rinpoche about this and he said that each time it repeats itself it is slightly defferent........maybe i added a few dots this time

not such a bad night night story huh
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
gc

The notion of "going back in time"....how does one do that? If we entertain the idea that H.G. Wells and many others have explored...that we can squirt ourselves ...our consciousness back through time... doesn't that notion presume that we would have some sense of pre-time? If indeed the radioactive decay or other methods used for dating substances is more than (or could be more than) a window into the past...does that mean that "time" isn't actually a human construct...a concept that marks the passages of "things" from one state condition to a different state condition....

If "time" isn't a notional construct developed by humankind...and thus relative to the "now"...and we find some way of moving backward through it....would you expect that at some "point in time" you'd be limited by a wall of ..."non-time"? That we wouldn't be able to penetrate that barrier?

I'm inclined to believe...well think...actually that the universe has always been here and if S.Hawking and other eminent physicists are satisfied with the "big-bang"...for instance...isn't it just as equally credible that the "big-bang"...a condensed universe expanded and contracted before and before and forever....?
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,614
2,362
113
Toronto, ON
gc

The notion of "going back in time"....how does one do that? If we entertain the idea that H.G. Wells and many others have explored...that we can squirt ourselves ...our consciousness back through time... doesn't that notion presume that we would have some sense of pre-time? If indeed the radioactive decay or other methods used for dating substances is more than (or could be more than) a window into the past...does that mean that "time" isn't actually a human construct...a concept that marks the passages of "things" from one state condition to a different state condition....

If "time" isn't a notional construct developed by humankind...and thus relative to the "now"...and we find some way of moving backward through it....would you expect that at some "point in time" you'd be limited by a wall of ..."non-time"? That we wouldn't be able to penetrate that barrier?

I'm inclined to believe...well think...actually that the universe has always been here and if S.Hawking and other eminent physicists are satisfied with the "big-bang"...for instance...isn't it just as equally credible that the "big-bang"...a condensed universe expanded and contracted before and before and forever....?

I don't believe time travel as we have been led to understand in SciFi novels is possible. If people had gone back in time, their visits would be recorded in history (unless that is what all the UFO reports are). I don't for once believe you can go back and change the course of history.

However, I think there may be parallel dimensions which may be visitable someday. I kinda liked the idea that was presented in STNG when Warfe jumps around various dimensions. In such a universe, time travel would be possible since you could not change your past.
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
Idratherbeskiing

Yeah "time" is a volatile concept. What most people don't realize is that we all shape history every moment of our lives....
 
May 28, 2007
3,866
67
48
Honour our Fallen
I'm inclined to believe...well think...actually that the universe has always been here and if S.Hawking and other eminent physicists are satisfied with the "big-bang"...for instance...isn't it just as equally credible that the "big-bang"...a condensed universe expanded and contracted before and before and forever....?

Yes indeed. thats the theory that the universe contracts upon itself to something the size of a pin prick and KA-BOOM...over and over...but it is so long that somehow mathamatically Hawkins proved it curves unto itself creating a circle, hence here we are again, me in my underwear typing on my msn to some chick i believe is 20 and in love with me who wants me to view her naked in her web cam.......Gotta go...bye....
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
Hey Dex how's it goin..?:)

Yeah not only wasn't old Isaac a "nice guy" he was a womanizer and always in lots of trouble over money and picking cabbages in another mans cabbage patch...if you know what I mean.
Things are goin' fine, thanks for asking, just got back from a fabulous 5-day fly-in fishing trip in the precambrian wilderness last week. Always a good time, 10 middle-aged reprobates in the middle of nowhere...

Actually, the word on old Isaac is that he probably died a virgin. After adolescence he had almost no contact with women that anyone knows about, and he never married or showed any signs of being interested in it.

On the matter of time and beginnings and the universe and whatnot, let me suggest you folks look into string theory a bit. There's a pretty good book about it called The Cosmic Landscape by Leonard Susskind. String theory seems to be suggesting that there isn't one universe, there's at least 10^500 of them in a much larger multiverse, as he calls it, they pop into existence as random quantum fluctuations all over the place, the laws of physics vary among them and we just happen to be in one that's appropriately set up for life like us to appear. That's a pretty lame summary of a 400-page book, but it is the gist of it. Looks like the Buddhists might have it right, at least in principle... ;-)