Quote: "Sudan President Omar El Bashir recently rejected a UN proposal to deploy a UN peacekeeping mission in Darfur, calling the offer "imperialistic."
Based just on this one quote, I would tell Sudan to go to hell.
Based on what the President of a country with no control says? He calls anything that the UN does "imperialistic". His views do not reflect those of the millions of people who have no homes and of the other hundreds of thousands of people who have already lost their lives in Sudan. Maybe we should ask all those people if they want foreign intervention?
Just so I'm clear here, it's a good idea to send Troops to Darfur, to help straighten the country out, but the consensus says we shouldn't do the same thing in Afganistan?
In other words you are promoting something similar to what the Yankees have done in Iraq?? Look at the mess there.
Of COURSE, it's different to Iraq.. Unfortunately for Darfur, it is NOT the area with oil.
That's right, because the US isn't there already, so we won't be seen to be doing the US' bidding.
Now, if this was an idea out of the US, it would be WRONG.
Let's not get into another "The U.S. went to Iraq for oil" brawl. I don't think anyone is up for it.
so you're all for sitting idly by as hundreds of thousands more peope are innocently killed? I find the situation to be a lot different than Iraq.
Just so I'm clear here, it's a good idea to send Troops to Darfur, to help straighten the country out, but the consensus says we shouldn't do the same thing in Afganistan?