Are The NY Times And WaPo Buying Massive Amounts Of Clicks From China?


Locutus
#1
this may be something to watch kids.



FAKE NEWSFLOW: Are The NY Times, Guardian, And WaPo Buying Clicks? China Jumps From Trickle To Half Of All Traffic In Two Months

Last week the Failing New York Times published an article crediting Donald Trump and the controversial election for “more subscribers in three months than all of 2015 (external - login to view),” claiming the addition of 276,000 new “digital-only” customers. The beleaguered publication owned by Mexican Billionaire Carlos Slim is doing so well in fact that they are vacating 8 floors of their New York headquarters to generate “significant rental revenue (external - login to view),” as well as pushing lame Twitter ads (external - login to view) offering 40% off subscriptions which state things like “Truth. It’s vital to democracy” and “The best independent journalism (external - login to view).”

While subscriber count may have allegedly increased, website traffic really didn’t start picking up until the first week in December. The Washington Post and The Guardian (UK) saw similar traffic trends around the same time, in stark contrast to most of their peers. A quick before-and-after illustrates the dramatic pickup in visitors:

Rankings at the beginning of December, 2016:

(external - login to view)

Rankings as of February 8th, 2017:

(external - login to view)

Traffic begins to pick up significantly around the middle of December for all three. Here’s a look at the overall picture compared to various other news outlets:




lots more


FAKE NEWSFLOW: Are The NY Times, Guardian, And WaPo Buying Clicks? China Jumps From Trickle To Half Of All Traffic In Two Months – ZeroPointNow (external - login to view)


That's atleast 30-40milion UNIQUE views from China.

Less than 10million people in China speak English.

Oh, and (((New York Times))) is also banned in China.

Is it DDOS getting registered? No

Are Chinese just watching our news? No, no chineybump for CNN.com or Foxnews.com ->

Cnn.com Traffic, Demographics and Competitors - Alexa (external - login to view)

Are the money changers behind this? Yes

/pol/ - FAKE NEWS FAKE VIEWS | Thread III - Politically Incorrect - 4chan (external - login to view)
 
mentalfloss
#2
It must be true if it's from 4chan.
 
Locutus
+1
#3  Top Rated Post
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalflossView Post

It must be true if it's from 4chan.

not only are you obtuse (external - login to view) , you're a lazy moron who's hard of reading.
 
mentalfloss
#4
Yes as long as believe it's true lil pup.
 
Danbones
#5
as i said a while back they will eventually lose their advertisers and implode
and then it will just be a zillion stooges on social media spreading the gossipel
 
Locutus
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalflossView Post

Yes as long as believe it's true lil pup.

ahhh...a close-minded your-own-news kid eh.
 
Jinentonix
+1
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalflossView Post

Yes as long as believe it's true lil pup.

You have GOT to irony impaired. Still waiting for the PROOF and not just your belief that wind turbines saved Ontario.
 
Locutus
+1
#8
the kid is an idiot.
 
pgs
+1
#9
Quote: Originally Posted by JinentonixView Post

You have GOT to irony impaired. Still waiting for the PROOF and not just your belief that wind turbines saved Ontario.

A proof is a proof when it's proven and windmills are proven . Jeesh how many times does he have to tell you .
 
mentalfloss
#10
Quote: Originally Posted by LocutusView Post

the kid is an idiot.


How's that Muslim ban coming?
 
taxslave
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by pgsView Post

A proof is a proof when it's proven and windmills are proven . Jeesh how many times does he have to tell you .

Is that like "true facts"?
 

Similar Threads

1
bic clicks
by Sal | Feb 24th, 2014
3
no new posts