The woman is deliberately being thick! Or her medical degree isn't valid. I think she has a vague grasp of the value of money. Justin should deep six her before she goes through his $30 billion l all by herself!
Jane Philpot- should she be jettisoned?
- Thread starter JLM
- Start date
My question is what kind of friend (and the owner of the Lexus is Philpot's BFF!!) charges $ 1,700 for 1 fuc&%ing day of driving around. Even at 10 hours, it still would be $170/ hour. Yikes, poor tax payers. Seems like another punch in the face, hearing this on the radio; on my way to work, where it takes many many hours to earn $1,700.
It was actually 2-days, the first day was $1,700 and the second day was a tiny bit more $ 1,900, who's going to notice!! She now wants to keep her job and pay back the $3, 700. I would just call my BFF and tell her that a $170+ per hour rental was too much and to give me back the overcharged amount of $ 2,900?
Yep, the woman may be a professional, but pertaining to matters of common sense and social deportment she is an idiot!
Negative, I was complaining about her thinking it's perfectly alright to book a limousine on the taxpayers' dime.
She was the big news last week..........
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/canadian-politics/145672-liberal-health-minister-spent-1-a.html
so be ready for next week's shocker about McKenna.......
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/canadian-politics/145758-feds-spent-10-681-photos.html
Last edited:
Hey - don't 'cha know their "pot" is always full....(of taxpayer's money) which they feel they deserve to spend in anyway they want. They're "entitled". And, eventually, the "fuss" will go away and they'll resume their "bad" habits.
Us peons are limited in what we can spend and, more importantly, have short memories which is why they are able to get away with crap like this. There's really no consequences for their actions; so they "pay back" a portion and, as someone commented earlier here, who knows where those funds came from (????).
It's disgusting that there are no moral qualms at all about any of this for those who achieve power.
JMHO
Us peons are limited in what we can spend and, more importantly, have short memories which is why they are able to get away with crap like this. There's really no consequences for their actions; so they "pay back" a portion and, as someone commented earlier here, who knows where those funds came from (????).
It's disgusting that there are no moral qualms at all about any of this for those who achieve power.
JMHO
Yes, Dixie and it was exactly that attitude and philosophy that put us $400 billion in debt under Trudeau Sr. and Lyin' Brian!
But, hey, there's $30 billion in the pot to be pissed away and only 6 more months to do it!
There is, and has been for a long time, a pervasive attitude among people with their hands in the public purse, be it employee, contractor or elected official, that government money is easy money. If our elected officials can't show a little thrift how is the message going to get through to the rest of them?
It's called "public service" for a good reason, it's not called "public privilege".
It's called "public service" for a good reason, it's not called "public privilege".
One of the problems we have today is Political correctness isn't necessarily compatible with "Survival of the Fittest".