US Warns Syrian Military… Against Operating Inside Syria!

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
US Warns Syrian Military… Against Operating Inside Syria!

US Warns Syrian Military… Against Operating Inside Syria!


Just when you thought US foreign policy could not get more absurd. Lt. Gen. Stephen Townsend, who is listed as “commander of US forces in Iraq and Syria,” has issued a wraning to the Syrian military that if its counter-insurgency operations on Syrian soil leave US troops on Syrian soil “feeling threatened,” the US military would “defend itself.”
That needs to be broken down to even be believed.
The Syrian military is fighting an armed uprising on its own soil. The US government is training and equipping several factions of that armed insurgency, in this case the Kurdish YPG militia. The US military is also operating on Syrian soil alongside and in support of the YPG militia. Members of the YPG militia have, over the past several days, been firing on Syrian government forces. The Syrian air force returns fire on its own soil and the US military that is illegally operating on Syrian soil issues a warning to the Syrian government to stop firing on insurgents on Syrian soil!
The US government has a military “commander” commanding US forces operating illegally – according to US and international law – on a foreign country’s soil.
Logic might suggest that if the US military does not want its Special Forces to feel threatened by Syrian government counter-insurgency activities, perhaps it should remove them from that foreign territory in which they are illegally operating.
But the empire creates its own logic and it is not for we mere mortals to understand it. If the Pentagon and the military-industrial complex want to threaten w

This could easily have gone in the Darwin Award thread.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ePvNlfrxfw
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Why do I feel the nice Murkins are going to wind up being patsies for all this military industrial insanity at some point in the not too distant future?

we could have a Dresden awards thread
 

davesmom

Council Member
Oct 11, 2015
2,084
0
36
Southern Ontario
Right on! The U.S. would be better to pull out of Syria and let them fight their own battles. What are they thinking of to threaten like that when they are not even in their own country?
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Right on! The U.S. would be better to pull out of Syria and let them fight their own battles. What are they thinking of to threaten like that when they are not even in their own country?
yeah, I think you are right, that is the several billion dollar question

another question might be:
how long before they start acting like that when it is their own country?
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Right on! The U.S. would be better to pull out of Syria and let them fight their own battles. What are they thinking of to threaten like that when they are not even in their own country?

This Syrian war was orchestrated and paid for by the Anglo Zionist Mob. If the mob fails there they fail everywhere.

yeah, I think you are right, that is the several billion dollar question

another question might be:
how long before they start acting like that when it is their own country?

That is no longer a hypothetical question is it?
 

Remington1

Council Member
Jan 30, 2016
1,469
1
36
As they should. The truth= Mid 2011, Syria when into a full civil war. In 2013, as many remember, the UN came out saying that 90,000 had been killed and by 2015 250,000 murdered. Sunni and Shia's full at war. Then the stories starting coming out that Assad was using chemical weapons, blocking access to food, water,etc.. IN September 2014, the US led a coalition to degrade ISIS who was committing war crimes. Russia, also agreed to help, but seems their friendship with Assad and Iran was underestimated. The idea that the US is responsible for the Civil war in Syria is not only absurd, it's unfounded. Ask Assad!!
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Hillary Clinton Admits ISIS Was Created By U.S. Government
Hillary Clinton Admits ISIS Was Created By U.S. Government | Your News Wire
oh yeah?

"Hillary Clinton Admits ISIS Was Created By U.S. Government
Posted on June 6, 2016 by Sean Adl-Tabatabai in Conspiracies // Comments (12)
Hillary Clinton admits that ISIS is a U.S. government creation

The mainstream media are covering up the fact that Hillary Clinton admitted in public that the U.S. government created both ISIS and Al Qaeda.

Why are most mainstream media outlets refusing to tell the public that the U.S. has never actively fought ISIS, but has instead supported them secretly in the Middle East?

Chuckbaldwinlive.com reports:

I’ll tell you why: the MSM is nothing more than a propaganda machine for the U.S. government–no matter which party is in power. The MSM doesn’t work for the U.S. citizenry. It doesn’t even work for its corporate sponsors. It works for the Washington Power Elite permanently ensconced in D.C. (and yes, those same Power Elite control most of those media corporate sponsors).

It is a sad reality that if one wants to get accurate news reporting, one must mostly bypass the U.S. propaganda media and look to sources outside the U.S. Here is a Canadian publication that covered the Hillary admission:

“The following video features Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton acknowledging that America created and funded Al Qaeda as a terrorist organization in the heyday of the Soviet-Afghan war:

“‘Let’s remember here… the people we are fighting today we funded them twenty years ago.

“‘Let’s go recruit these mujahideen.

“‘And great, let them come from Saudi Arabia and other countries, importing their Wahabi brand of Islam so that we can go beat the Soviet Union.’”

“What she does not mention is that at no time in the course of the last 35 years has the US ceased to support and finance Al Qaeda as a means to destabilizing sovereign countries. It was ‘a pretty good idea’, says Hillary, and it remains a good idea today:

“Amply documented, the ISIS and Al Nusrah Mujahideen are recruited by NATO and the Turkish High command, with the support of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Israel.


do tell
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
"We ask of G‑d that if we were destined to be the recipients of harsh decrees in the new year, may they be transferred to this chicken..."
The Kaparot Ceremony - High Holidays
I can't help but wonder if the US hasn't become one of "those" kind of chickens
the kind that go to someone else's home to roost

I'm a chicken farmer, small scale, I'm down to three now. They sacrifice and then throw the fukkin chicken away, it won't work unless you also partake of the flesh. No fukkin wonder they got so much bad luck.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
This Syrian war was orchestrated and paid for by the Anglo Zionist Mob. If the mob fails there they fail everywhere.



That is no longer a hypothetical question is it?
I think we are totally infiltrated by the Saudi's.

Saudi's have 1 million times more money then the Jews. Look at Dubai.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
I think we are totally infiltrated by the Saudi's.

Saudi's have 1 million times more money then the Jews. Look at Dubai.

What do you know about Jews? Look at Babylon. Look at Berlin, look at Moscow look at Washington look at your shoes.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
lol
At the current rate of per barrel that oil is going for, the sauds only have one profitable export:
the extreme Wahhabism created and installed buy the anglo installed saudi royals
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Hey, she knows more about what's going on than all those chickenhawks on the right.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
damn straight
she started much of it
lol
we came we saw he died cackle cackle cackle
coff coff... chicken neck ...coff...bobble head ...coff..

Exposing the Libyan Agenda: a Closer Look at Hillary’s Emails

US-NATO intervention was allegedly undertaken on humanitarian grounds, after reports of mass atrocities; but human rights organizations questioned the claims after finding a lack of evidence. Today, however, verifiable atrocities are occurring. As Dan Kovalik wrote in the Huffington Post, “the human rights situation in Libya is a disaster, as ‘thousands of detainees [including children] languish in prisons without proper judicial review,’ and ‘kidnappings and targeted killings are rampant’.”
Exposing the Libyan Agenda: a Closer Look at Hillary’s Emails
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
damn straight
she started much of it
lol
we came we saw he died cackle cackle cackle
coff coff... chicken neck ...coff...bobble head ...coff..

Exposing the Libyan Agenda: a Closer Look at Hillary’s Emails

US-NATO intervention was allegedly undertaken on humanitarian grounds, after reports of mass atrocities; but human rights organizations questioned the claims after finding a lack of evidence. Today, however, verifiable atrocities are occurring. As Dan Kovalik wrote in the Huffington Post, “the human rights situation in Libya is a disaster, as ‘thousands of detainees [including children] languish in prisons without proper judicial review,’ and ‘kidnappings and targeted killings are rampant’.”
Exposing the Libyan Agenda: a Closer Look at Hillary’s Emails
Easy to say that about anyone who has been in the trenches. She hasn't been just a blowhard armchair quarterback like Drumf.

Those who've never made mistakes just haven't been there to make them. Loudmouths who haven't any skin in the game are dime a dozen.
 

Durry

House Member
May 18, 2010
4,709
286
83
Canada
Copy/paste

A pragmatic overview of what appears to be an insoluble problem affecting much of the world as we know it to day?

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.


Forget the Syrian Civil War for a moment. Even without the Sunnis and Shiites competing to give each other machete haircuts every sunny morning, there would still be a permanent Muslim refugee crisis.

The vast majority of civil wars over the last ten years have taken place in Muslim countries. Muslim countries are also some of the poorest in the world. And Muslim countries also have high birth rates.

Combine violence and poverty with a population boom and you get a permanent migration crisis.

No matter what happens in Syria or Libya next year, that permanent migration crisis isn’t going away.

The Muslim world is expanding unsustainably. In the Middle East and Asia, Muslims tend to underperform their non-Muslim neighbors both educationally and economically. Oil is the only asset that gave Muslims any advantage and in the age of fracking, its value is a lot shakier than it used to be.

The Muslim world had lost its old role as the intermediary between Asia and the West. And it has no economic function in the new world except to blackmail it by spreading violence and instability.

Muslim countries with lower literacy rates, especially for women, are never going to be economic winners at any trade that doesn’t come gushing out of the ground. Nor will unstable dictatorships ever be able to provide social mobility or access to the good life. At best they’ll hand out subsidies for bread.

The Muslim world has no prospects for getting any better. The Arab Spring was a Western delusion.

Growing populations divided along tribal and religious lines are competing for a limited amount of land, power and wealth. Countries without a future are set to double in size.

There are only two solutions; war or migration.

Either you fight and take what you want at home. Or you go abroad and take what you want there.

Let’s assume that the Iraq War had never happened. How would a religiously and ethnically divided Iraq have managed its growth from 13 million in the eighties to 30 million around the Iraq War to 76 million in 2050?

The answer is a bloody civil war followed by genocide, ethnic cleansing and migration.

What’s happening now would have happened anyway. It was already happening under Saddam Hussein.

Baghdad has one of the highest population densities in the world. And it has no future. The same is true across the region. The only real economic plan anyone here has is to get money from the West.

Plan A for getting money out of the West is creating a crisis that will force it to intervene. That can mean anything from starting a war to aiding terrorists that threaten the West. Muslim countries keep shooting themselves in the foot so that Westerners will rush over to kiss the booboo and make it better.

Plan B is to move to Europe.

What's This?
And Plan B is a great plan. It’s the only real economic plan that works. At least until the West runs out of native and naïve Westerners who foot the bill for all the migrants, refugees and outright settlers.

For thousands of dollars, a Middle Eastern Muslim can pay to be smuggled into Europe. It’s a small investment with a big payoff. Even the lowest tier welfare benefits in Sweden are higher than the average salary in a typical Muslim migrant nation. And Muslim migrants are extremely attuned to the payoffs. It’s why they clamor to go to Germany or Sweden, not Greece or Slovakia. And it’s why they insist on big cities with an existing Muslim social welfare infrastructure, not some rural village.

A Muslim migrant is an investment for an entire extended family. Once the young men get their papers, family reunification begins. That doesn’t just mean every extended family member showing up and demanding their benefits. It also means that the family members will be selling access to Europe to anyone who can afford it. Don’t hike or raft your way to Europe. Mohammed or Ahmed will claim that you’re a family member. Or temporarily marry you so you can bring your whole extended family along.

Mohammed gets paid. So does Mo’s extended family which brokers these transactions. Human trafficking doesn’t just involve rafts. It’s about having the right family connections.

And all that is just the tip of a very big business iceberg.

Where do Muslim migrants come up with a smuggling fee that amounts to several years of salary for an average worker? Some come from wealthy families. Others are sponsored by crime networks and family groups that are out to move everything from drugs to weapons to large numbers of people into Europe.

Large loans will be repaid as the new migrants begin sending their new welfare benefits back home. Many will be officially unemployed even while unofficially making money through everything from slave labor to organized crime. European authorities will blame their failure to participate in the job market on racism rather than acknowledging that they exist within the confines of an alternate economy.

It’s not only individuals or families who can pursue Plan B. Turkey wants to join the European Union. It’s one solution for an Islamist populist economy built on piles of debt. The EU has a choice between dealing with the stream of migrants from Turkey moving to Europe. Or all of Turkey moving into Europe.

The West didn’t create this problem. Its interventions, however misguided, attempted to manage it.

Islamic violence is not a response to Western colonialism. Not only does it predate it, but as many foreign policy experts are so fond of pointing out, its greatest number of casualties are Muslims. The West did not create Muslim dysfunction. And it is not responsible for it. Instead the dysfunction of the Muslim world keeps dragging the West in. Every Western attempt to ameliorate it, from humanitarian aid to peacekeeping operations, only opens up the West to take the blame for Islamic dysfunction.

The permanent refugee crisis is a structural problem caused by the conditions of the Muslim world.

The West can’t solve the crisis at its source. Only Muslims can do that. And there are no easy answers. But the West can and should avoid being dragged down into the black hole of Muslim dysfunction.

Even Germany’s Merkel learned that the number of refugees is not a finite quantity that can be relieved with a charitable gesture. It’s the same escalating number of people that will show up if you start throwing bags of money out of an open window. And it’s a number that no country can absorb.

Muslim civil wars will continue even if the West never intervenes in them because their part of the world is fundamentally unstable. These conflicts will lead to the displacement of millions of people. But even without violence, economic opportunism alone will drive millions to the West. And those millions carry with them the dysfunction of their culture that will make them a burden and a threat.

If Muslims can’t reconcile their conflicts at home, what makes us think that they will reconcile them in Europe? Instead of resolving their problems through migration, they only export them to new shores. The same outbursts of Islamic violence, xenophobia, economic malaise and unsustainable growth follow them across seas and oceans, across continents and countries. Distance is no answer. Travel is no cure.

Solving Syria will solve nothing. The Muslim world is full of fault lines. It’s growing and it’s running out of room to grow. We can’t save Muslims from themselves. We can only save ourselves from their violence.

The permanent Muslim refugee crisis will never stop being our crisis unless we close the door.


ABOUT DANIEL GREENFIELD
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.