Is this guy a liar, or is he stupid..............Or is he INNOCENT?

Danbones

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Don't know about out west, but here in Ontarrible the OPP consider a case solved if charges are laid, not if someone is proved guilty.
Which for a normal person would be like considering it a successful day of work just because they showed up.

Union government rubrics seem to not include real measurements at all...
So the odds that the real guilty person will be convicted at anytime are somewhat low.
but hey, that union is always great at raise time eh?
 
JLM

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Mowich said:
On the basis of evidence presented in court by the Crown, I would say he is guilty, JLM. His sister's testimony sure didn't do him any good especially as she tried to change her story.
Click to expand...


I agree, I think Stupid is the correct answer! How blood and D.N.A. being found in the motor home can be construed as circumstantial evidence beats me. But being a diplomatic kind of guy I have to judge him innocent until proved guilty. :) (I'd say being late for court four times is indisputable proof of stupid)
 
Danbones

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
blood and dna in the motor home?
his motor home?

bet you will find traces of blood and DNA in EVERY used motor home
 
Mowich

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
75
Eagle Creek
JLM said:
I agree, I think Stupid is the correct answer! How blood and D.N.A. being found in the motor home can be construed as circumstantial evidence beats me. But being a diplomatic kind of guy I have to judge him innocent until proved guilty. :) (I'd say being late for court four times is indisputable proof of stupid)
Click to expand...

If indeed he consumed the amount of drugs that witnesses recounted during the trial, I imagine his brain is probably not functioning at optimum capabilities which would explain the rambling interview and why he would ignore his lawyer's wishes to keep silent.
 
JLM

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Mowich said:
If indeed he consumed the amount of drugs that witnesses recounted during the trial, I imagine his brain is probably not functioning at optimum capabilities which would explain the rambling interview and why he would ignore his lawyer's wishes to keep silent.
Click to expand...


Yep, I'd say there's a good chance the lad will be getting permanent room and board!
 
Mowich

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
75
Eagle Creek


 
JLM

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
It might not be over yet.....................this piece of sh*t could walk! Apparently some law that was changed in 1990 hasn't made it into the law books yet, so the judge thought the old law was still in force. What a f**king joke of a justice system! So who's responsible for this bull sh*t? I say lock the a$$hole up with Vader in the same cell and let them both rot. They deserve each other. F**K!
 
Tecumsehsbones

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,620
7,093
113
Washington DC
JLM said:
The first two for sure. He left D.N.A. he drove their vehicle, he used their cell phone - if he didn't kill them he knows who did, and as we were taught as kids if you are present in the commission of a crime you are just as guilty as the perpetrators. GUILTY as charged!
Click to expand...
You must have misunderstood.

Try this simple exercise. The victim of a murder is, pretty much by definition, present in the commission of the murder. Does that mean the victim is guilty of murder?

Your understanding of conspiracy and accessory is. . . amusing.
 
JLM

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Tecumsehsbones said:
You must have misunderstood.

Try this simple exercise. The victim of a murder is, pretty much by definition, present in the commission of the murder. Does that mean the victim is guilty of murder?

Your understanding of conspiracy and accessory is. . . amusing.
Click to expand...


Trying to implicate the victim is just dumb!
 
JLM

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Remington1 said:
DNA is the one thing that does not lie in courts.
Click to expand...


You'd be right 99% of the time..........................idiot bureaucrats do get samples mixed up or contaminated. However in this case there is all kinds of extra corroborating evidence. Only an idiot could draw the conclusion that he is innocent.
 
C

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
Don't know about out west, but here in Ontarrible the OPP consider a case solved if charges are laid, not if someone is proved guilty.

The guy who railroaded Steven Truscott ended up leading the OPP as his reward for findng a murderer and molding his guilt, double quick ... no fuss, no mess. That was good police work, back then.

It probably still is. Make a theory. Make the facts fit the theory.
 
Danbones

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
I'm all for hanging the guilty
but to trust the system to not screw up something irreparable...

sure we will hand over bin laden just show us some proof first...
they got POOF!!! all right

lee harvey oswald
1963: Dallas
The Government Decides That Truth Doesn’t Exist
https://ratical.org/ratville/JFK/LHO.html

Nearly 50 years since the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., the FBI and Memphis Police Department have sparingly released information implicating themselves or members of their agencies in facilitating and directly causing the untimely death of Dr. King. Although the Justice Department officially claims James Earl Ray assassinated MLK, a civil suit later determined that a Memphis cop was involved in a conspiracy to murder the civil rights leader.
Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/fb...vement-assassination-mlk/#abqBIE4R5OvHswjP.99
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom