The Forces of No. Christy Clark strikes back at LNG opponents

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,303
11,388
113
Low Earth Orbit
There are people who just say no to everything, and heaven knows there are plenty of those in B.C.'

It' about time she grew a pair. Let's just hope it doesn't take 12 years for them to drop.

Clark had sharp words Monday for what she calls the "forces of no" in British Columbia who mount resistance efforts to government initiatives purely out of a fear of change.

First Nations leaders quickly shot back at the premier, labelling her comments "paternalistic" and "mindless."

Clark made the statements during a news conference where she fielded questions about opposition to the Trans-Pacific Trade Partnership, environmental concerns over liquefied natural gas development and tax breaks for the mining industry.

She said negotiating trade pacts and resource developments involves tough, but potentially rewarding benefits and she would rather be known as an achiever than a quitter.

"There are people who just say no to everything, and heaven knows there are plenty of those in British Columbia," said Clark. "But just because it's hard doesn't mean you give up. It doesn't mean you should be a quitter."

She criticized a coalition of First Nations, environmentalists and Opposition New Democrats who signed a declaration demanding a protection zone near a proposed multi-billion-dollar LNG project at Lelu Island near Prince Rupert.

"I'm not sure what science the forces of no bring together up there except that it's not really about the science," said Clark.

"It's not really about the fish. It's just about trying to say no. It's about fear of change. It's about a fear of the future."

The proposed project is billed as the largest private-sector investment in B.C.'s history, valued at $36 billion and estimated to create 4,500 construction jobs.

But the Lelu Island and Flora Bank region at the mouth of the Skeena River, is considered vital to the ecosystem of B.C.'s second-largest salmon-bearing waterway.

A coalition signed a declaration to protect the area at the end of a weekend summit in Prince Rupert, attended by more than 300 hereditary and elected First Nations leaders, scientists, politicians, fishermen and others.

"Once again, people from the entire length and breadth of the Skeena River and its estuaries have come together to let both levels of government and the industry know that they've made a mistake in siting this particular project," said Gerald Amos, Friends of Wild Salmon spokesman.

Amos said the area surrounding Lelu Island is known for its eel grass beds that offer protection for salmon before they head to the ocean or return to the Skeena to spawn.

He said First Nations view Clark's comments about as insensitive to people who want to protect the Skeena salmon.

"She's on the wrong side of this equation," he said. "Labelling the forces of no is paternalistic. It's downright insulting."

Lax Kw'alaams hereditary Chief Yahaan said the project is a threat to a centuries-old salmon-fishing culture. He said Clark doesn't understand the ties his people have to the river and the salmon.

"Her mentality, the mindless phrases that come out of her mouth," said Yahaan. "Saying that we're the people of no. We're the indigenous people of this land. We live here. We know about the environment. She doesn't."

Premature concerns?

But Gitga'at First Nation Chief Arnold Clifton said declaring Lelu Island and Flora Bank off limits to industrial development may be premature.

Clifton and four other elected area chiefs representing the northwest's Tsimshian Nation said many First Nations area awaiting the results of two independent scientific reviews before deciding whether to support the LNG project.

He downplayed the comments of Yahaan and other hereditary chiefs, but pointed at area New Democrats who signed the declaration.

"They stepped in a little too quickly," said Clifton of nearby Hartley Bay. "They should have spoken to the chiefs first."

New Democrat members of the legislature Jennifer Rice, Robin Austin and Doug Donaldson and the North Coast's federal member of Parliament Nathan Cullen signed the declaration.

Provincial New Democrat LNG critic Bruce Ralston said his party opposes the Lelu Island project because it does not meet the party's conditions of approval, including First Nations consent.

He said the NDP remains committed to supporting the LNG industry, providing it meets the Opposition's four conditions.
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
This is not about the voices of no its about people from different political stripes
who don't want Enbridge in this province. Personally I support Kinder Morgan I
do not support Northern Gateway because of the company operating the project.
Different owners maybe but not the one in charge.


And I am not in favor of the trans pacific trade deal either.
This is nothing more than a forced sharing of our vast and
abundant quantity of resources. We should be using those
resources to demand favorable conditions to markets.
In the long term it would mean higher prices and a high
standard of living. Within a decade the world is going to be
starved for energy and we can extract a high price while the
rest are subject to all kinds of conditions in some New World
Order. We hold four aces and we are going to trade them for a
pair of threes go figure
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,303
11,388
113
Low Earth Orbit
Your opposition to enbridge is unfounded.

As producers, TPP is going to put money in both our pockets. I'd like to be able to go to Vietnam or Myramar and find your apples and my canola on the shelves.

We (the world) are not going to run out of energy any time soon.

We've already waited 50 years too long to export.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,303
11,388
113
Low Earth Orbit
Why yes, we, (AB and SK) have been allowing them to pipe and sell NG from FSJ and the Peace all the way to Montreal for decades in the very line that is to become Energy East without a single protest or obsurd condition.

US fracked gas from the controversial Marcellus Shale in New England is the reason the gas line will be converted as it is being used in Eastern Canada.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,346
557
113
59
Alberta
Why yes, we, (AB and SK) have been allowing them to pipe and sell NG from FSJ and the Peace all the way to Montreal for decades in the very line that is to become Energy East without a single protest or obsurd condition.

US fracked gas from the controversial Marcellus Shale in New England is the reason the gas line will be converted as it is being used in Eastern Canada.
No, I mean I wonder if they'll share the profits.