Owner Declares Shooting Range a MUSLIM FREE ZONE

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
Owner Declares Shooting Range a MUSLIM FREE ZONE



Jan Morgan is facing controversy after declaring her business a “Muslim free zone” Sunday.

The owner of Gun Cave Indoor Shooting Range in Hot Springs, Ark. has drawn a line in the sand, and while critics will get angry they should read her reasons why.

After the recent influx of violence perpetuated by self-proclaimed Islamists, Morgan began to study the religion and discovered “109 verses commanding hate, murder and terror against all human beings who refuse to submit or convert to Islam.”

On her website, Jan Morgan Media, Morgan, an investigative journalist and certified NRA gun instructor, explained that her decision was made based on facts.

Read her ten-point reasoning that has already provoked controversy:
I officially declare my business, The Gun Cave Indoor Shooting Range, a MUSLIM FREE ZONE . . .

1) The Koran, which I have read and studied thoroughly and (which all muslims align themselves with), contains 109 verses commanding hate, murder and terror against all human beings who refuse to submit or convert to Islam. Read those verses of violence here.

2) My life has been threatened repeatedly by muslims who are angry that I have studied their koran and have, over the past two years, been exposing the vileness of the Koran and its murderous directives.

3) * The barbaric act of beheading an innocent American in Oklahoma by a muslim
* the Boston bombings (by muslims)
* the Fort Hood mass shooting (by a muslim) that killed 13 people and injured over 30 people
* and the murder of 3000 innocent people (by muslims) on 9/11
This is more than enough loss of life on my home soil at the hands of muslims to substantiate my position that muslims can and will follow the directives in their Koran and kill here at home.

4) Because the nature of my business involves firearms and shooting firearms in an enclosed environment, my patrons are not comfortable being around muslims who align themselves with a religion that clearly commands hate, murder, and violence against all non muslims. Therefore many of my patrons are uncomfortable around Muslims with guns. (can you blame them?)

5) My range rents and sells guns to my patrons. Why would I want to rent or sell a gun and hand ammunition to someone who aligns himself with a religion that commands him to kill me?

6) * Muslims, who belong to and, or, support ISIS, are threatening to kill innocent Americans.
* Muslims, who belong to or support AL Qaeda, are threatening to kill innocent Americans.
* Muslims who belong to or support HAMAS are threatening to kill innocent Americans.
See a common thread here?

7) I not only have the right to refuse service but a RESPONSIBILITY to provide a safe environment for people to shoot and train on firearms. I can and have turned people away if I sense they are under the influence of alcohol or mind altering drugs. I have a federal firearms license…

The ATF informed us when we received the license that if we feel any reason for concern about selling someone a firearm, even sense that something is not right about an individual, or we are concerned about that persons mental state, even if they pass a background check, we do not have to sell that person a gun.

In other words, a federal agency has given us this kind of discretion for service based on the nature of the business. I can and have turned people away if I sense an issue with their mental state. So… its difficult to imagine how the DOJ could have issues with this when ATF gave us this discretion.

8) I have no way of looking at Islam other than as a theocracy, not a religion. Islam is undoubtedly the union of political, legal, and religious ideologies. In other words law, religion and state are forged together to form what Muslims refer to as “The Nation of Islam.” Once again it is given the sovereign qualities of a nation with clerics in the governing body and Sharia law all in one. This is a Theocracy, not a religion.

The US Constitution does not protect a theocracy. The 1st Amendment is very specific about protecting the rights of individuals from the government, as it concerns the practice of religions, not theocracies. It clearly differentiates between government and religion. Again protecting the individual’s religious beliefs and practices from (the state) government. In Islam, religion and state are one.

We are a Nation governed by laws, or the law of the land the U.S. Constitution. We are not a Nation that is governed by religion, politicians or clerics.
How then, can anyone say that, the practice of Islam is protected by the U.S. Constitution?

The Muslim brotherhood has a documented plan for the destruction of America from within, discovered by our own government during a raid of MB operatives in America. In addition, I am very cognizant of the civilization jihad under way in my country by American Muslims. In a number of states Muslims, through our legal system, are trying to force us to accept Sharia Law over Constitutional law. I do not wish to do business with people who stand against the Constitution and are fighting to replace it.

9) Islam allows Muslims to kill their own children, (honor killing) if the behavior of those children embarrasses or dishonors the family name. (did you know that dating outside of the faith is justification for murdering their daughters and this has already occurred on American soil?) Why would I want people (who believe it’s okay to murder their own children), be in the presence of other children? My patrons often bring their kids to the range to teach them to shoot. I am responsible for providing a safe environment for those children to learn gun safety and shooting sports.

10) In the 14 hundred year history of Islam, muslims have murdered over 270 million people. Not all muslims are terrorists, but almost all terrorists in the world right now are muslim. Since you can’t determine by visual assessment, which ones will kill you and which ones will not, I am going to go with the line of thought that ANY HUMAN BEING who would either knowingly or unknowingly support a “religion” that commands the murder of all people who refuse to submit or convert to that religion, is not someone I want to know or do business with. I hold adults accountable for the religion they align themselves with.

In summary, I not only have the right, but a responsibility to provide a safe environment for my customers. I do not believe my decision is religious discrimination because I do not classify islam as a religion.. It is a theocracy/terrorist organization that hides behind the mask of religion in order to achieve its mission of world domination.

People who shoot at my range come from all religious backgrounds… some are atheists… I do not care about their religious beliefs. I care about the safety of my customers who come to shoot here. The government allows businesses to ban me from entering their business with my gun because the property owner feels uncomfortable or wants to provide a “safe” environment for their patrons which is in clear violation of my 2nd Amendment right to bear arms, so…

I should be able to deny service to people on the same premise. Can my government really force me to invite someone who had threatened to kill me, into my home or business?

I will do whatever is necessary to provide a safe environment for my customers, even at the cost of the increased threats and legal problems this decision will likely provoke.

Jan Morgan- owner / The Gun Cave Indoor Shooting Range

source: Owner Declares Shooting Range a MUSLIM FREE ZONE?; explains why she did.... | Alternative


...........................................

1. this chick is hot, 2. my future wife ;)
 

Serryah

Executive Branch Member
Dec 3, 2008
8,977
2,073
113
New Brunswick
... another idiot who's trying to legitimize their bigotry by selectively reading the Koran same as the extremists do. Good job being like the people you hate!

That said, I do agree with her right to say who can and can't use her shooting range, provided it's a private club membership type thing and not an 'open to the public' thing. If it's public, then she cannot deny anyone access based on their religion just like she couldn't deny anyone access based on race.

Make it private, more power to her.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
... another idiot who's trying to legitimize their bigotry by selectively reading the Koran same as the extremists do. Good job being like the people you hate!

That said, I do agree with her right to say who can and can't use her shooting range, provided it's a private club membership type thing and not an 'open to the public' thing. If it's public, then she cannot deny anyone access based on their religion just like she couldn't deny anyone access based on race.

Make it private, more power to her.

As opposed to terrorist idiots that murder innocent people based on selective reading of the koran.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,412
1,668
113
Then we can send a crack unit of RN deck apes after them.

Royal Navy. British Army. RAF. SAS. SBS. The police, of course, for anyboy practising Islam within the United Kingdom.

Islam is evil. We've just started yet another global Kill-A-Kuffar Week (and you're one of the filthy kuffar pigs, remember) and it's time something was done about it because, quite frankly, you and your ilk will do sod all.

Remember the sniveling RN scum who got seized by the Iranians? I won't call them sailors because that would be an insult to sailors.

And who was at fault in that incident? Yep, you've guessed it, it was the Muslims.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,586
7,086
113
Washington DC
And who was at fault in that incident? Yep, you've guessed it, it was the Muslims.
I always figured a snivelling coward is at fault for being a snivelling coward. But I'm sure you'll blame the Irish, or the Scots, or the Muslims, or the Yanks, or Labour, or the Martians, or anybody you need to in order to preserve your delusion that the English are worth. . . well, anything.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,412
1,668
113
I always figured a snivelling coward is at fault for being a snivelling coward.

The fault in that situation lies entirely with the Muslims.


But I'm sure you'll blame the Irish, or the Scots, or the Muslims, or the Yanks, or Labour, or the Martians, or anybody you need to in order to preserve your delusion that the English are worth. . . well, anything.


I'll blame who I need to blame to stand up for England and Englishness.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
What a silly twit.



While that comment could quite easily refer to Blackie, it was actually meant for the bimbo in the OP
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,412
1,668
113
What a silly twit.

While that comment could quite easily refer to Blackie, it was actually meant for the bimbo in the OP


And that's coming from the bright spark who can't even spell his own username. What a numpty.

As for that woman, I think she's done the right thing in making her shooting range a Muslim-free zone.

Put it this way, had she made it a Jewish-free zone or a white-free zone I doubt it would have generated this much faux outrage. It's only received this much Lefty-style faux outrage because the Muslims are one of the Left's client groups. Had she made it a Jewish-free zone or a heterosexual-free zone or a man-free zone you and your mates wouldn't give a flying fig.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
And that's coming from the bright spark who can't even spell his own username. What a numpty.

As for that woman, I think she's done the right thing in making her shooting range a Muslim-free zone.

Put it this way, had she made it a Jewish-free zone or a white-free zone I doubt it would have generated this much faux outrage. It's only received this much Lefty-style faux outrage because the Muslims are one of the Left's client groups. Had she made it a Jewish-free zone or a heterosexual-free zone or a man-free zone you and your mates wouldn't give a flying fig.

Why do you hate freedom so much?
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,412
1,668
113
Whether they're at fault or not.


I don't care about the bloody Yanks or the Red Indians or the Sweaties. I especially don't care about the Muslims. Islam is an evil cult. I care about England.

Why do you hate freedom so much?

That's not the question to ask.

The fact of the matter is this: Had this woman declared this shooting range a man-free zone; a Jewish-free-zone; a Christian-free zone; a white-free zone or a heterosexual-free zone or anyone else who isn't one of the Left's poor, put-upon client groups, you, Tecumsehbones and the other usual suspects would have been noticeable for their quietness.

The only thing about this story that really gets on your tits is not that anyone is banned - because as I pointed out, there's a whole range of people whose banning from this range wouldn't bother you much - but that it is your beloved Muslims who are banned.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,412
1,668
113
Of course it's the the question to ask. In fact, I'll ask again. Why do you hate freedom?


I don't hate freedom. I support this woman's right to decide who can and cannot use her own shooting range. She owns it.

And I will say again: Had she banned men, heterosexuals or Christians from her shooting range you freedom-lover wouldn't give two figs.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,586
7,086
113
Washington DC
I don't care about the bloody Yanks or the Red Indians or the Sweaties. I especially don't care about the Muslims. Islam is an evil cult. I care about England.
And you don't care about well over half the population of England, except to want them dead, as you have made abundantly clear.