There are tarsands on burnaby mountain? Are the protestors also opposed to the pipeline that supplies the SFU building with natural gar heat?
no - protestors are concerned over the expansion proposal that, per the Kinder Morgan formal NEB submission, would see increased tanker traffic through the Salish Sea and Burrard Inlet:
from existing ~60 tankers per year, to proposed ~410 tankers per year:
protestors are also concerned that Kinder Morgan hasn't been upfront with it's extended secondary expansion plans... those not appearing within the formal NEB submission/review process; specifically:
- per the NEB submission, capacity expansion intended is stated as an increase of 540,000 barrels a day... from the existing 350,000 barrels a day on the 60 year-old original line, to an additional 540,000 barrels a day on the new pipeline => for a total capacity of 890,000 barrels a day.
- in truth, as Kinder Morgan has finally acknowledged, the designed capacity of the new pipeline is 780,000 barrels a day... 240,000 barrels a day capacity more than is being applied for in the current NEB submission. When Kinder Morgan opts to increase to the max capacity design level, a convenient "loop-hole" in the NEB Act will allow Kinder Morgan to avoid any additional environmental assessment and public interest scrutiny on this additional 240,000 barrels a day capacity. Of course, in order to export that additional design capacity, it would either mean a further increase in tanker numbers per year of the current sized "Aframax class (120,000 dwt) tankers".... or... an increase in tanker size to the "Suezmax class (200,000 dwt) tankers", which would require dredging of Burrard Inlet, something Kinder Morgan already has designs on.