Obama is the great divider

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com


The Great Divider is the 'most polarizing' president ever

Evidence continues to mount that President Obama's legacy when he leaves office in 2017 will be best captured by the phrase “Great Divider.” For his fifth year in the Oval Office, Obama's “partisan gap” - the difference in the two major parties' approval rating of a president - is 71 points, as measured by Gallup. That nearly ties Obama with President George W. Bush's 72-point gap in his fifth year in office.

But Obama’s overall tenure tells the rest of the polarization story: “Obama's first, second, third, and fourth years in office were the most polarized for any president's first, second, third, or fourth years," Gallup found. "However, the 71-point party gap in ratings of Obama's job approval during his fifth year in office is slightly less than the 72-point gap found in Bush's fifth year.”

One year into his second term, there is no reason to think Obama is softening his approach. If anything, Obama is doubling down on programs and policies that are certain to divide the country even further.

First, the president is refusing to be reasonable or realistic about Obamacare, which is proving a bigger train wreck than anyone could have imagined. For him, and his Democratic congressional allies, it’s full-speed ahead and damn those obstructionist Republicans for putting up legislative obstacles, either in the form of bills passed by the House or GOP senators offering amendments and insisting on open debate and recorded votes in an election year.

No matter that five million or more Americans have already lost their preferred health insurance, millions more are losing access to the doctors and care providers they like or must have, and costs are skyrocketing for inferior coverage. These problems will intensify and grow more damaging – as will the campaign rhetoric — in the coming months as voters prepare to go to the polls in November.

Second, Obama is determined to focus on an issue that ranks near the bottom of concerns for the vast majority of Americans. Two-thirds of Americans say the country is headed in the wrong direction and half say getting the economy moving again is the most important issue, according to the latest Fox News poll. Only 13 percent of those surveyed pointed to income inequality as the country’s most important issue despite the fact Obama has made it the top priority of his second term.

But income inequality is less valuable an indicator of societal economic health than wealth inequality because the latter measures total assets available to an individual. As the American Enterprise Institute’s James Pethokoukis has pointed out, “In 1989, the top 1 percent owned 37.4 percent of U.S. net worth. In 2010, that share was actually a bit lower at 35.4 percent.” There is less wealth inequality now than 25 years ago. But don’t expect to hear that in the Great Divider’s State of the Union address next week.

source: Examiner Editorial: The Great Divider is the 'most polarizing' president ever | WashingtonExaminer.com
 

WLDB

Senate Member
Jun 24, 2011
6,182
0
36
Ottawa
The south left over Lincoln winning the election. I'd say that is way more polarizing than anything Obama has done.
 

BaalsTears

Senate Member
Jan 25, 2011
5,732
0
36
Santa Cruz, California
The south left over Lincoln winning the election. I'd say that is way more polarizing than anything Obama has done.

In other words you're saying that Obama is the most polarizing American leader since the end of the American Civil War in April of 1865.

Or the Republiklan party and their dittoheads.

Creating division weakens the country. Perhaps that's all that remains.
 

WLDB

Senate Member
Jun 24, 2011
6,182
0
36
Ottawa
In other words you're saying that Obama is the most polarizing American leader since the end of the American Civil War in April of 1865.

Thats one way of interpreting it. The intent was to point out he is not the most polarizing president, as the OP claims. I succeeded. I don't really feel the need to rank them all and find Obama's position.
 

BaalsTears

Senate Member
Jan 25, 2011
5,732
0
36
Santa Cruz, California
Obama and his party cannot achieve electoral success unless people in the United States are divided into competing tribes in a zero sum game. In doing so Obama and his party have smashed the very idea of a common American identity shared by all. The most unfortunate part is that the rules of the political game in the US are set by the most ruthless and aggressive party. The result is the rise of tribal identities and the death knell of the American identity.
 

WLDB

Senate Member
Jun 24, 2011
6,182
0
36
Ottawa
Islam and politics?? Islam is a theocracy, based on a bastardized religion. No politics there.

A theocracy is a form of government and as such is inherently political.

Obama and his party cannot achieve electoral success unless people in the United States are divided into competing tribes in a zero sum game.

Thats nothing new. Both parties have been relying on that for decades. One big thing they have in common is doing everything they possibly can to prevent a third option from arising.
 

BaalsTears

Senate Member
Jan 25, 2011
5,732
0
36
Santa Cruz, California
A theocracy is a form of government and as such is inherently political.



Thats nothing new. Both parties have been relying on that for decades. One big thing they have in common is doing everything they possibly can to prevent a third option from arising.

Have Reublicans been restrained in creating divisions by fear of the consequences of political correctness?