Tough on trolls: UK internet abusers may face up to 2 years in jail

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
Tough on trolls: UK internet abusers may face up to 2 years in jail



Internet trolls could face two years behind bars if new tough legislation “to combat cruelty” is adopted, according to UK Justice Secretary Chris Grayling.

That’s four times the current six-month prison term and would proove the government’s zeal to “take a stand against a baying cyber-mob,” Grayling told The Daily Mail.

"These internet trolls are cowards who are poisoning our national life. No one would permit such venom in person, so there should be no place for it on social media. That is why we are determined to quadruple the current six-month sentence,” Justice Secretary added.



It comes days after TV presenter Chloe Madeley was abused online, an action which Grayling described as "crude and degrading."

Madeley received threats on the internet after she defended her mother Judy Finnigan's statement on a rape by footballer Ched Evans, which she said didn’t cause "bodily harm" and was "non-violent."

The presenter’s father spoke out against the trolling, saying that “prosecution awaits” the people who sent “sick rape threats” to his daughter.

Madeley herself said, “it needs to be accepted that physical threats should not fall under the 'freedom of speech' umbrella.”

“It should be seen as online terrorism and it should be illegal,” she added.

Currently, magistrate courts deal with online offenses under the Malicious Communications Act, but under the new law, serious cases could be passed on to higher crown courts. It would be an amendment to the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill.

Also, police would have more time to collect evidence for successful prosecution and cases of so-called “revenge porn”, when ex-lovers post compromising material.

In a recent internet abuse case, in September, UK citizen Peter Nunn was jailed for only 18 weeks for retweeting rape threats to MP Stella Creasy.

source: http://rt.com/uk/197200-trolls-inte..._medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Great, so Blackleaf will be here even more then.

Knew I shoulda built that moat!

Just report him to the briddish authorities. I'm sure they have someone in custody that they would like to punish by making him share a cell with blackie.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
How many have been jailed for the 6 months thing before this change, they don't define what they consider trolling.
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
3
36
London, Ontario
Just report him to the briddish authorities. I'm sure they have someone in custody that they would like to punish by making him share a cell with blackie.
8O

Solitary confinement, bread and water, anything but that! That's cruel and unusual punishment!
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
This place would look like a desert. lol

Yes, the personal attacks are considerable here. There would be quite a few members that would no longer be here if such a law came into effect. For me, I don't say anything to anybody here that I wouldn't be willing to say to them if they were standing in front of me. I know the maturity level would increase tremendously if everybody behaved that way but from my perspective, the entertainment value would diminish.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Yes, the personal attacks are considerable here. There would be quite a few members that would no longer be here if such a law came into effect. For me, I don't say anything to anybody here that I wouldn't be willing to say to them if they were standing in front of me. I know the maturity level would increase tremendously if everybody behaved that way but from my perspective, the entertainment value would diminish.
That's some of your finest dishonesty, to date.
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
I don't think the law is intended for a forum discussion board we all agree on what the rules are
and when it reaches a certain point there is a minimum standard acceptable so we in fact have
an acceptance rule to govern ourselves. The problem is we have a medium that is open in an
open society and we have a minimum number of people who don't share the ideals of common
decency and good manners. The internet is an all about ME to some people.Cyber Bullying is
not even considered as a no no to some. Verbal abuse of a magnitude of ten on the Richter Scale
for some is a natural thing. Threatening peoples lives is already an offense under the law.
Society has a flaw or two in recent years. One instead of punishing people with existing laws the
legislators have the urge to pass new laws to cover the ones they can't enforce just to look like
they are doing something. The other flaw is legislators and those in senior power positions want
to punish everyone instead of just punishing those who commit the misdeeds.
In the end we have a legal system that is crushed by the weight of its own laws and nothing
happens but everyone feels better. The other side of the coin is debate in an open society is stunted
and the problem goes under ground, the citizens become disgruntled and human progress never
evolves like it should. In a democracy even the ignorant are entitled to their say. In s society where
expression is supressed we even elect some people without knowing how ignorant they are until its
too late. That it the problem as well it gives some safe harbor until they are in a position to really
express their ignorance
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
No one would permit such venom in person, so there should be no place for it on social media.

Permit...such a polite word. In the real world they'd be knocked about the head for spewing.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
I don't think the law is intended for a forum discussion board we all agree on what the rules are
.....

But I don't think we all agree on what the rules are. Granted, the forum does have a list but it is selectively enforced so I would hardly call them rules if such a law ever came into effect here.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Yes, the personal attacks are considerable here. There would be quite a few members that would no longer be here if such a law came into effect. For me, I don't say anything to anybody here that I wouldn't be willing to say to them if they were standing in front of me. I know the maturity level would increase tremendously if everybody behaved that way but from my perspective, the entertainment value would diminish.
That is sensible, the message is the same but the delivery is toned down. Perhaps there should be a thread for one liners but then most of the threads would have big holes in them