Wage theft on the rise in the US


Tonington
#1
Employers are being cracked down on by State and Federal regulators more than at any time in the past. In some cases, overtime hours are not being paid out by payroll. In other cases, the employer forced employees to sign blank time sheets so that they could record 'minimal' hours of work. FedEx, has classified it's drivers as independent contractors to avoid paying overtime.

"I’m amazed at how petty and abusive some of these practices are. Cutting corners is increasingly seen as a sign of libertarianism rather than the theft that it really is."
New York Attorney General, Eric T. Schneiderman (external - login to view)

I worked a crappy job after high school for about one year, unloading trucks for Zeller's. Something similar happened to me, though in the end it was some criminal fraud and embezzlement by the HR manager. And off to university I went!
 
Tecumsehsbones
+1
#2  Top Rated Post
Love me some free enterprise!
 
Tonington
#3
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

Love me some free enterprise!

Lol, free. Good one
 
Tecumsehsbones
+1
#4
Quote: Originally Posted by ToningtonView Post

Lol, free. Good one

Free to the enterprise. To the workers, not so much.
 
Retired_Can_Soldier
#5
Most Trucking companies are federally registered so that when you have a labor dispute they don't have to answer to the province.
 
Tonington
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by Retired_Can_SoldierView Post

Most Trucking companies are federally registered so that when you have a labor dispute they don't have to answer to the province.

Sounds a bit like registering a ship in the Bahamas. Though I hope you don't have to deal with Somali pirates...
 
Retired_Can_Soldier
+1
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by ToningtonView Post

Sounds a bit like registering a ship in the Bahamas. Though I hope you don't have to deal with Somali pirates...

Yeah its similar., I work for a company that treats its drivers pretty fair and pays well, but I'm in Alberta, you don't find a lot of that elsewhere.
 
Ludlow
#8
Yes and we don't be needin any regulatory measures imposed on us good ole boys cause we're honest..
 
Tecumsehsbones
+1
#9
Quote: Originally Posted by LudlowView Post

Yes and we don't be needin any regulatory measures imposed on us good ole boys cause we're honest..

Dam raht thar, good buddy. Thet thar gummint better keep its hands off'n our freedom!
 
MHz
#10
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

Dam raht thar, good buddy. Thet thar gummint better keep its hands off'n our freedom!

You and DB in the same shape going after the same poor sap? This is going to be a classic.
 
tay
#11
Nearly 10 years ago, Delores Killingsworth Barber, then 25 and an employee at a Roosevelt Boulevard Walmart, took the witness stand in a Philadelphia courtroom and told a judge and jury that the retail giant was "stealing our time."

It got worse during the holidays, when, she testified, workers were told to "do whatever it takes to get it done, and if that meant missing your break, that's what had to be done."

Many years and boxes of legal documents later, the workers should be paid for those missed breaks.

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court said it would not take up a lost-wages case involving 186,000 current and former Wal-Mart Stores Inc. employees, clearing the way for the workers, all from Pennsylvania, and their lawyers to receive $187 million in the class-action suit.

With interest, the employees, who had been owed $140 million of the $187 million, will now split $224 million, said their attorney, Michael D. Donovan of Donovan Litigation Group in Berwyn.

"Wage theft will not be tolerated, and class actions are an optimal way for large numbers of workers to recover wages stolen by their employers," Donovan said Monday.

Wal-Mart spokesman Randy Hargrove said: "We are disappointed the Supreme Court decided not to review our case. While we continue to believe these claims should not be bundled together in a class-action lawsuit, we respect the court's decision."

The case began in 2002, when Michelle Braun, working at the Walmart store in Franklin Mills, joined other colleagues in filing a wage-and-hour lawsuit against the retailer.

Wal-Mart appealed, saying that the class should not have been certified and that each of the 186,000 workers should have had to testify individually about his or her particular circumstances.

Pennsylvania's Supreme Court affirmed the jury verdict in December 2014, saying that Wal-Mart's own records provided the necessary evidence.

Hargrove said that over the last decade, Wal-Mart "has taken additional steps, including enhancing our time-keeping systems. We want to make sure we pay employees for every hour worked and provide paid meal and rest breaks."

Supreme Court refuses to hear Wal-Mart case; Pa. workers owed $224M (external - login to view)
 
Tecumsehsbones
#12
Don't worry, the Dear Leader will stop this outright theft of good American dollars by all these bad hombres and the so-called judges.
 
Danbones
#13
the last guy sure did
 

Similar Threads

10
Gas/Wage Theft Hotline Setup
by tay | Sep 19th, 2012
10
N.S. is ‘a low-wage ghetto’
by Praxius | Nov 14th, 2008
2
The rise and rise of London
by Blackleaf | Feb 19th, 2007
24
Making the minimum wage a living wage
by marygaspe | Feb 10th, 2007
21
Wage Gap - done by noon on day 1
by Karlin | Jan 4th, 2007
no new posts