Benghazi scandal tied to White House

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Benghazi scandal tied to White House

Benghazi scandal tied to White House

[The documents] include a newly declassified e-mail showing then-White House Deputy Strategic Communications Adviser Ben Rhodes and other Obama administration public relations officials attempting to orchestrate a campaign to “reinforce” President Obama and to portray the Benghazi consulate terrorist attack as being “rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.” Other documents show that State Department officials initially described the incident as an “attack” and possible kidnap attempt.

In addition a document showed Susan Rice was informed before her TV appearance: “Responding to a question about whether it was an organized terror attack, Toria said that she couldn’t speak to the identity of the perpetrators but that it was clearly a complex attack.” Toria refers to Victoria Nuland, then State Department spokeswoman and now assistant secretary for Europe and Eurasia. She had been unfairly maligned in some quarters and falsely accused of participating in the illicit editing of the talking points. These documents exonerate her entirely, pointing the finger directly at the White House and the CIA. (It is noteworthy that in the days between the attack and Rice’s TV outing, Nuland never tied the video to the attack; Carney did, most clearly on Sept. 14.) With regard to the CIA:

The Judicial Watch documents confirm that CIA talking points, that were prepared for Congress and may have been used by Rice on “Face the Nation” and four additional Sunday talk shows on September 16, had been heavily edited by then-CIA deputy director Mike Morell. According to one email
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/1919_production-4-17-14.pdf#page=21

The first draft apparently seemed unsuitable….because they seemed to encourage the reader to infer incorrectly that the CIA had warned about a specific attack on our embassy. On the SVTS, Morell noted that these points were not good and he had taken a heavy hand to editing them. He noted that he would be happy to work with [then deputy chief of staff to Hillary Clinton]] Jake Sullivan and Rhodes to develop appropriate talking points.

The e-mails were exchanged at a time when the State Department and CIA already knew that the video was not at issue and that this was a staged attack of some type. Former United Nations spokesman Richard Grenell who was briefly part of the Mitt Romney presidential team told Right Turn, “The e-mail from Ben Rhodes to a bunch of political appointees at the White House proves that there was a scramble inside Obama’s inner circle to protect him from the fallout of a U.S. Ambassador being killed on the anniversary of 9/11 and a few short weeks from his reelection.” He pointedly added: “ It’s time for real journalists to confront the President. It’s clear now that he and his team have not been truthful with the American people.”


Updated

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...s-that-actually-ended-up-in-terrorists-hands/

At the start of the Libyan civil war, which began as part of the Arab Spring movement, the U.S. and Europe had difficulties telling friend from foe. Al Qaeda sympathizers and extremists were directly woven into the fabric of the rebel fighters, and weapons shipments coming from the Persian Gulf into Libya landed in the hands of terrorists and other non-state actors, according to a United Nations report and several U.S. officials who spoke to TheBlaze. The 2014 U.N. report revealed that “most arsenals continue to be controlled by non-state armed groups and governing institutions have very limited capacity to control Libya’s borders, ports and airports, which contribute to the overall insecurity in the surrounding region and within Libya.”

“Information started to surface in other media about the terrorist element that was within the rebels and about how we had to be very, very careful about who we were supporting,” said Kubic, who has spent a significant time in Libya before and after the overthrow of Gadhafi. ”Even [former NATO top commander] Adm. [James] Stavridis went before the Congress and alluded to an intelligence summary that he had received that had indications … of rebels who were actually terrorists.”

It was shortly after the 2011 NATO military campaign started against then-Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi, however, that rumors began to surface that members of the rebel forces were actually linked to Al Qaeda, retired Rear Adm. Chuck Kubic told TheBlaze. Kubic is a member of the Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi, a group comprised mainly of retired military officials and former intelligence officers aimed at discovering the truth of what happened the night of the attacks.


A U.S. businesswoman who had access to senior Libyan officials and provided information as a paid informant for the CIA and FBI, said she was asked to provide intelligence on various rebel leaders and their actions while she was conducting business in Libya. Speaking to TheBlaze TV’s For the Record and going only by the pseudonym Annie to protect her identity, she said the Obama administration was aware that $500 million of the $1 billion in weapons delivered in shipments from weapons dealers in the Persian Gulf were being taken by members of Al Qaeda.

Current and former U.S. officials intimately familiar with operations in Libya at the time confirmed Annie’s statement to TheBlaze.
 
Last edited:

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
We all know that this event was the result of some kook in Cali that posted an anti-Islamist youtube video... The rest was spontaneous, including the RPGs, papamilitary style advances, etc... That's all pretty much par for the course in Benghazi
 

BaalsTears

Senate Member
Jan 25, 2011
5,732
0
36
Santa Cruz, California
Obama got away with screwing up on Libyan policy. If he hadn't switched sides in Libya the four Americans would still be alive. However, while Obama got away with it...Hillary won't. That stupid bitch will be held to account.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
We all know that this event was the result of some kook in Cali that posted an anti-Islamist youtube video... The rest was spontaneous, including the RPGs, papamilitary style advances, etc... That's all pretty much par for the course in Benghazi


Oddly enough the only person who did any jail time was that kook in Cali!
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
those 'folks' as barry would say. we'll get those 'folks' responsible.

folks
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65

Kathryn Tyler ‏@ensignbay



@MarkSteynOnline saw clearly what happened at #Benghazi. His Oct 26, 2012 article:


http://tinyurl.com/8kf8wke



pic.twitter.com/rwEKwO4c88


 

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
Where was all this right wing outrage over the 4500 people who died in Iraq?

It is incredibly disrespectful to use people's lives as pawns in a political game. It makes me really sick watching all of these idiots go on and on about this pretending that they give two ****s about the people who died when really they are just trying to stick it to Obama. If Romney or McCain were in the white house when this happened Fox news wouldn't be giving 5 minutes of airtime to it.
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
The direct warnings to Mr. Bush about the possibility of a Qaeda attack began in the spring of 2001. By May 1, the Central Intelligence Agency told the White House of a report that “a group presently in the United States” was planning a terrorist operation. Weeks later, on June 22, the daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be “imminent,” although intelligence suggested the time frame was flexible.

But some in the administration considered the warning to be just bluster. An intelligence official and a member of the Bush administration both told me in interviews that the neoconservative leaders who had recently assumed power at the Pentagon were warning the White House that the C.I.A. had been fooled; according to this theory, Bin Laden was merely pretending to be planning an attack to distract the administration from Saddam Hussein, whom the neoconservatives saw as a greater threat.Intelligence officials, these sources said, protested that the idea of Bin Laden, an Islamic fundamentalist, conspiring with Mr. Hussein, an Iraqi secularist, was ridiculous, but the neoconservatives’ suspicions were nevertheless carrying the day.

In response, the C.I.A. prepared an analysis that all but pleaded with the White House to accept that the danger from Bin Laden was real.

“The U.S. is not the target of a disinformation campaign by Usama Bin Laden,” the daily brief of June 29 read, using the government’s transliteration of Bin Laden’s first name. Going on for more than a page, the document recited much of the evidence, including an interview that month with a Middle Eastern journalist in which Bin Laden aides warned of a coming attack, as well as competitive pressures that the terrorist leader was feeling, given the number of Islamists being recruited for the separatist Russian region of Chechnya.


Could the 9/11 attack have been stopped, had the Bush team reacted with urgency to the warnings contained in all of those daily briefs? We can’t ever know. And that may be the most agonizing reality of all.




Throughout that summer, there were events that might have exposed the plans, had the government been on high alert. Indeed, even as the Aug. 6 brief was being prepared, Mohamed al-Kahtani, a Saudi believed to have been assigned a role in the 9/11 attacks, was stopped at an airport in Orlando, Fla., by a suspicious customs agent and sent back overseas on Aug. 4.

Two weeks later, another co-conspirator, Zacarias Moussaoui, was arrested on immigration charges in Minnesota after arousing suspicions at a flight school. But the dots were not connected, and Washington did not react.



http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,843
92
48
I see lots of deflection by the leftards who are defending BHO's regime.
 

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
I see lots of deflection by the leftards who are defending BHO's regime.

Maybe you guys need a bit of self reflection. Why are you more mad over 4 deaths caused by a lack of preparedness many levels down from the white house than you are over 4500 deaths cased by lies that came directly from the white house?
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,843
92
48
Maybe you guys need a bit of self reflection. Why are you more mad over 4 deaths caused by a lack of preparedness many levels down from the white house than you are over 4500 deaths cased by lies that came directly from the white house?
More deflection for the half-black prez.
 

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
They not mad about the 4 deaths.....but the lies that came after....get it?

That is exactly what I am talking about. They are playing this up as if they care about the people who died, when really they just want to catch the administration in a "gotcha" moment.

The lies that the Bush administration told came before the 4500 deaths and lead directly to those deaths. But these same commentators defended that for some reason.

More deflection for the half-black prez.

Lol, not helping your case.
 

BaalsTears

Senate Member
Jan 25, 2011
5,732
0
36
Santa Cruz, California
Maybe you guys need a bit of self reflection. Why are you more mad over 4 deaths caused by a lack of preparedness many levels down from the white house than you are over 4500 deaths cased by lies that came directly from the white house?

There have been major consequences on the right from the Second Iraq War. The base of the conservative/libertarian movement has become isolationist. This is a profound change.

I do agree that Obama should receive the same treatment as GWB. He should be held accountable.