How is it that sexual assault became the center for a political agenda I thought
such activities were criminal not political If we are going to follow that rule we
must therefore mention and expect it be mentioned the political background of
every Priest and Evangelical Minister, and every other faith leader of any religion
because of course we have entered into the nonsense of dragging politics into
an alleged criminal offense.
Is it relevant what party he was from? I would say no not really anymore than its
relevant what political stripe a businessman or preacher is from/
All I need to know is that a forty seven year old creep was with a fourteen year old
girl, traveling to a function and he supposedly physically assaulted her.
I have a few relevant questions though.
1 Why were they traveling together and was there third person as a chaperone?
2 What was the relationship to the girl or was there one?
3 What function were they attending?
4 What was in effect as far as parental supervision?
5 Were they sharing a hotel room?
6 How could the parents allow such behavior and what was his position of trust?
These are the real questions that are valid and they are scarcely eluded to in the
If however this was an NDP sanctioned event and they knew they were traveling
together without a family relationship that would call into question the decision of
the party. If not it lacks relevance. I guess for some half a story without detail is
better than no story