Winnipeg police warn of pedophile’s release

T

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
Police are warning the public about the release of a convicted pedophile considered to be a high risk to re-offend.



Ryan James Gabourie, 32, will be released from Headingley Correctional Institution Thursday after serving sentences for breaching the conditions of his release from a federal prison after serving seven years for offences including molesting five boys between the ages of 5 and 11.


Gabourie has also been convicted of possession of child pornography.


His latest conviction came in November 2012 when he was found using a computer and the Internet, contrary to his recognizance order, one day after his release. Gabourie's previous convictions stem from the sexual molestation of five young boys ages five to 11 after entering their homes through unlocked windows or doors and assaulting them in their beds while their families were sleeping nearby.




more






Sex offender deemed high risk to reoffend released from jail - Winnipeg Free Press
 
taxslave

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
IF he is a high risk to reoffend why on earth would they release him? Shouldn't kids right to safety trump some kiddiddler's right to run loose?
 
EagleSmack

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
taxslave said:
IF he is a high risk to reoffend why on earth would they release him? Shouldn't kids right to safety trump some kiddiddler's right to run loose?
Click to expand...

Because having a low prison population is a good statistic to have?
 
B00Mer

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com


Might as well paint a bulls eye on the guys back, because if he were 500 feet from my kids (if I had kids) I'd kills his ***..

 
B

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
taxslave said:
IF he is a high risk to reoffend why on earth would they release him? Shouldn't kids right to safety trump some kiddiddler's right to run loose?
Click to expand...

One of those "downsides of a free society" things. Without a dangerous offender designation, they can't keep anyone locked up longer than the time they were sentenced to.

It might make more sense to treat these guys more like someone who is mentally ill. At least in that case you could keep them separated from society indefinitely until they are deemed safe.
 
Retired_Can_Soldier

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,366
577
113
59
Alberta
BornRuff said:
It might make more sense to treat these guys more like someone who is mentally ill. At least in that case you could keep them separated from society indefinitely until they are deemed safe.
Click to expand...

Really, how would you suppose that we would keep them separated from society with a mental illness designation? There are tons of people with mental illness out on the street, some violent.

I wonder how many children you have to rape to be considered a dangerous offender. Obviously five is too low of a number.
 
karrie

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
Retired_Can_Soldier said:
I guess when he kills a kid they will lock him up for good.
Click to expand...


No, when he reoffends he will be locked up for good. He'll have proven he can't be rehabilitated.

On a sidenote, what the hell is with chinless guys and pedophilia? He's a dead ringer for my pedo ex-brother-inlaw.
 
B

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
Retired_Can_Soldier said:
Really, how would you suppose that we would keep them separated from society with a mental illness designation? There are tons of people with mental illness out on the street, some violent.

I wonder how many children you have to rape to be considered a dangerous offender. Obviously five is too low of a number.
Click to expand...

The current NCR protocol wouldn't necessarily fit, but it could be similar to that.

In cases where someone commits a crime, but it is determined that the individual did not understand what they were doing or did not know it was wrong because of mental illness, they are ordered into a secure mental health facility. There, they receive treatment and are not discharged until they are found to not pose a significant risk to society.

The current system wouldn't fit because I imagine that most of these sexual offenders do know that what they are doing is wrong. I feel that these sexually motivated crimes are very different from other violent crimes or things like theft or drug dealing though. You are not going to punish someone's sexual desires out of them.

We need some sort of system that can make sure that people work out whatever it is that made them do what they did, and ensures that their release is linked to some type of determination that they are safe to be out in society again.
 
S

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
Not "only" is he a pedophile, he targets, hunts, breaks and enters to get at his prey.

He is not even an opportunistic pedophile, he is a hunter; a successfully proven hunter. So, is there anything more dangerous than this type of offender? No.
 
IdRatherBeSkiing

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,617
2,365
113
Toronto, ON
BornRuff said:
One of those "downsides of a free society" things. Without a dangerous offender designation, they can't keep anyone locked up longer than the time they were sentenced to.

It might make more sense to treat these guys more like someone who is mentally ill. At least in that case you could keep them separated from society indefinitely until they are deemed safe.
Click to expand...

Like the crazy guy who was released on his own recognizance, stopped taking his pills and chopped up the guy on the greyhound in Manitoba? I think he is also now getting day passes again. We don't do a better job with the crazies as we do with the criminals.
 
S

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
IdRatherBeSkiing said:
Like the crazy guy who was released on his own recognizance, stopped taking his pills and chopped up the guy on the greyhound in Manitoba? I think he is also now getting day passes again. We don't do a better job with the crazies as we do with the criminals.
Click to expand...
8O s'cuse me?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom