Calgary boy died from flesh-eating strep infection, grandpa says - Calgary - CBC News
How incredibly stupid (and cruel) can some idiots be?
How incredibly stupid (and cruel) can some idiots be?
Nor gubmints.Life and death decisions are for trained professionals not doctor wannabes.
Nor gubmints.
Agreed, but where will you draw the line? Say a parent only lets their child listen to gangsta rap and the kid becomes a misogynist, do we then charge the parents after the kid beats up his GF?They do it all the time whether it be with the armed forces, the judicial system or enacting laws on the subject. Thats part of what they are there for.
If the parents of this kid get off the laws need to be changed. This kids death was pointless and easily could have been prevented.
Agreed, but where will you draw the line? Say a parent only lets their child listen to gangsta rap and the kid becomes a misogynist, do we then charge the parents after the kid beats up his GF?
A racist black parent teaches their son to hate whites and he goes around doing the "knock-out game", do we charge the parents?
depends on what you read...it's call necrotizing faciitis... for the most part I would say nois flesh eating disease contagious? :shock:
So Walter what does the government have to do with that child dying? Only you would find something political about a boys death.Nor gubmints.
You're right.Only you would find something political about a boys death.
So Walter what does the government have to do with that child dying? Only you would find something political about a boys death.
they shouldn't, but a child shouldn't die because of some bizarre held belief by their parentLots. There are a lot of similarities between this unfortunate death and JWs refusing transfusions. Many people insist that is wrong as well. Why should the government be permitted to decide what is best for everyone?
Lots. There are a lot of similarities between this unfortunate death and JWs refusing transfusions. Many people insist that is wrong as well. Why should the government be permitted to decide what is best for everyone?
The government isn't deciding. Society is deciding.
How does that make it right?
In society we need to have standards of acceptable behaviour. For example, it's contrary to standards of acceptable behaviour to take the life of another. Is that right? Does that not 'interfere' with our choices?
Granted it becomes more complicated when a child is involved.
Agreed, but where will you draw the line? Say a parent only lets their child listen to gangsta rap and the kid becomes a misogynist, do we then charge the parents after the kid beats up his GF?
A racist black parent teaches their son to hate whites and he goes around doing the "knock-out game", do we charge the parents?