U.S. builders hoard mineral rights under new homes

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
3
36
London, Ontario
U.S. builders hoard mineral rights under new homes



Michelle Conlin and Brian Grow, Reuters

Oct 11, 2013 , Last Updated: 10:43 AM ET

NAPLES, FLA. - Robert and Julie Davidson fell hard for the gleaming new house at the Valencia Golf and Country Club in Naples, Florida. They loved the way the palm-fringed, Spanish-style home backed up to the fifth-hole fairway. And they were taken with the three-bedroom's high ceilings and open plan. Plus the neighborhood - with its power-washed driveways, blooming hibiscus and guarded gatehouse - seemed all "dressed up."
But when the Davidsons paid $255,385 in 2011 for the house on Birdie Drive, they didn't know that they had, in essence, bought only from the ground up, and that their homebuilder, D.R. Horton, had kept everything underneath.
"Wait a second, wait a second," Robert Davidson said after a reporter told him that a search of county records showed that D.R. Horton still owned the oil, natural gas, water and other natural resources beneath his and his neighbors' homes. "Let me sit down a minute here. They have the mineral rights to the land I'm on?"
In golf clubs, gated communities and other housing developments across the United States, tens of thousands of families like the Davidsons have in recent years moved into new homes where their developers or homebuilders, with little or no prior disclosure, kept all the underlying mineral rights for themselves, a Reuters review of county property records in 25 states shows. In dozens of cases, the buyers were in the dark.


More here:

U.S. builders hoard mineral rights under new homes


It is a pretty long article, I was reading it at lunchtime. Is this something new? Seems very sneaky to me. I know caveat emptor and all that but I can completely understand why someone would not think to check for the mineral rights to their home.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Big deal. Almost no one in Canada owns the mineral rights under their home. I would have to look see who owns it under mine right now. At one time Weldwood did then Texico. I believe CPRail owned them at one time.
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,617
2,365
113
Toronto, ON
But they can't come and drill for said minerals even if they have the rights. So it's not a big deal and they probably saved some money by not having them included.
 

Sons of Liberty

Walks on Water
Aug 24, 2010
1,284
0
36
Evil Empire
U.S. builders hoard mineral rights under new homes



Michelle Conlin and Brian Grow, Reuters

Oct 11, 2013 , Last Updated: 10:43 AM ET

NAPLES, FLA. - Robert and Julie Davidson fell hard for the gleaming new house at the Valencia Golf and Country Club in Naples, Florida. They loved the way the palm-fringed, Spanish-style home backed up to the fifth-hole fairway. And they were taken with the three-bedroom's high ceilings and open plan. Plus the neighborhood - with its power-washed driveways, blooming hibiscus and guarded gatehouse - seemed all "dressed up."
But when the Davidsons paid $255,385 in 2011 for the house on Birdie Drive, they didn't know that they had, in essence, bought only from the ground up, and that their homebuilder, D.R. Horton, had kept everything underneath.
"Wait a second, wait a second," Robert Davidson said after a reporter told him that a search of county records showed that D.R. Horton still owned the oil, natural gas, water and other natural resources beneath his and his neighbors' homes. "Let me sit down a minute here. They have the mineral rights to the land I'm on?"
In golf clubs, gated communities and other housing developments across the United States, tens of thousands of families like the Davidsons have in recent years moved into new homes where their developers or homebuilders, with little or no prior disclosure, kept all the underlying mineral rights for themselves, a Reuters review of county property records in 25 states shows. In dozens of cases, the buyers were in the dark.


More here:

U.S. builders hoard mineral rights under new homes


It is a pretty long article, I was reading it at lunchtime. Is this something new? Seems very sneaky to me. I know caveat emptor and all that but I can completely understand why someone would not think to check for the mineral rights to their home.

Soooo all these lawyers representing their clients' interests are in on it??? 8O
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
3
36
London, Ontario
Soooo all these lawyers representing their clients' interests are in on it??? 8O

Well they make some mention in the article that, apparently, a lot of people buy houses without using a lawyer. That, to me, seems rather stupid. It's a contract and often times it can be a lengthy and complex one. So that's on the buyers, absolutely.

It just seems sneaky and kind of underhanded to me. Unless I'm really off the mark on how I understand property ownership in the U.S., but isn't it 'your home is your castle' kind of thing?
 

Sons of Liberty

Walks on Water
Aug 24, 2010
1,284
0
36
Evil Empire
Well they make some mention in the article that, apparently, a lot of people buy houses without using a lawyer. That, to me, seems rather stupid. It's a contract and often times it can be a lengthy and complex one. So that's on the buyers, absolutely.

If people are stupid enough not to be represented, then screw them.

It just seems sneaky and kind of underhanded to me. Unless I'm really off the mark on how I understand property ownership in the U.S., but isn't it 'your home is your castle' kind of thing?

If I were any of them I would hand over the case to the ACLU and see if there is a Constitutional basis for reversal.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,665
113
Northern Ontario,
Big deal. Almost no one in Canada owns the mineral rights under their home. I would have to look see who owns it under mine right now. At one time Weldwood did then Texico. I believe CPRail owned them at one time.
I don't know about everywhere else in Canada, but in my neck of the woods in Northern Ontario, in order to attract settlers before and after ww2, farmers' lots included mineral rights.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
I don't know about everywhere else in Canada, but in my neck of the woods in Northern Ontario, in order to attract settlers before and after ww2, farmers' lots included mineral rights.

Question is who owns the mineral rights now. That happened in BC as well but mineral rights like water rights do not transfer automatically.
 

skookumchuck

Council Member
Jan 19, 2012
2,467
0
36
Van Isle
I don't know about everywhere else in Canada, but in my neck of the woods in Northern Ontario, in order to attract settlers before and after ww2, farmers' lots included mineral rights.

Generally not in the rest of the country. Railroads owned nearly all of it originally.
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
3
36
London, Ontario
If people are stupid enough not to be represented, then screw them.

Fair enough, I'm not defending them, lol. I was just questioning if the practice itself, what the developer/builder was/is doing, was exactly legal.

If I were any of them I would hand over the case to the ACLU and see if there is a Constitutional basis for reversal.
I think one of the developers in the article had ceased the practice while the matter was before the courts which make me wonder if the developer may have thought it might be a questionable practice in the first place. I'm not trying to lay it all on them, the buyer takes his/her share, but it does take two to tango.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Fair enough, I'm not defending them, lol. I was just questioning if the practice itself, what the developer/builder was/is doing, was exactly legal.

I think one of the developers in the article had ceased the practice while the matter was before the courts which make me wonder if the developer may have thought it might be a questionable practice in the first place. I'm not trying to lay it all on them, the buyer takes his/her share, but it does take two to tango.

It should show up on a title search. Any easements, encroachments etc do. Since mineral rights are registered it would be pretty difficult to hide ownership.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,665
113
Northern Ontario,
Question is who owns the mineral rights now. That happened in BC as well but mineral rights like water rights do not transfer automatically.
My father wasn't the original owner when he bought our farm in 1945, but I remember when he sold it in 1963, reading the deed and it had a patent # which meant that it included mineral rights.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
My father wasn't the original owner when he bought our farm in 1945, but I remember when he sold it in 1963, reading the deed and it had a patent # which meant that it included mineral rights.

Be interesting to know if the current owner still has mineral rights or if the property has been subdevided who owns the mineral rights to each lot.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
In Canada the allodial rights as it is called all belong to the crown and have been, through the constitution, been handed to the provinces. In the US most allodial rights are held under 'eminent domain' which is once again the govt. Basically since about the 60's no person has had any mineral rights and really only has the surface rights. Further to all that in Canada even the surface rights aren't truly held by the homeowner, they are granted 'right of use' while actual ownership remains with the crown.

Most property ownership in the common law world is fee simple. Land is "held of the Crown" in England and Wales and the Commonwealth realms. In the United States, land is subject to eminent domain by federal, state and local government, and subject to the imposition of taxes by state and/or local governments, and there is thus no true allodial land.