Judge bars 'jihad' evidence in Fort Hood trial

[Locutus]

(ASSOCIATED PRESS) A military judge blocked several key pieces of evidence Monday that prosecutors said would explain the mindset of the soldier accused in the 2009 shooting rampage at Fort Hood, including his belief that he had a “jihad duty” to carry out the attack.

Prosecutors had asked the judge to approve several witnesses and various evidence to support what they allege motivated Maj. Nidal Hasan to kill 13 people and wound more than 30 others at the Texas military base. But the judge, Col. Tara Osborn, blocked nearly all of it.

Osborn barred any reference Hasan Akbar, a Muslim soldier sentenced to death for attacking fellow soldiers in Kuwait during the 2003 Iraq invasion. Prosecutors wanted to prove Hasan’s attack was a “copycat,” but the judge said introducing such material would “only open the door to a mini-trial” of Akbar.


Judge bars ‘jihad’ evidence in Fort Hood trial


related


The Daily Smug: MSNBC: Boston bombers weren’t jihadists


h/t bcf

 

[Goober]

They cannot afford to have this classed as a terror attack.

 

[tober]

It sounds like the judge is preventing prosecutors from making the trial a political theatre. That is good. It is supposed to be a criminal trial, not a political show. From everything the media has said there should be no difficulty in proving what happened. Stopping it from becoming a political kangaroo court is a good thing. America has become a lawless zoo in too many ways.