Ottawa’s insistence on high immigration levels during downturns questioned in report

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
Finally a think tank that says the glaringly obvious. It was conventional wisdom the second generation does better, but will this be the case when first generation is sacrificed years of soul destroying underemployment and crap wages? That's not very nice. but it is hard assed corporate meanness. And the Tories have lots of that.

The govt thinks it can beat the system during a recession because it will "target" immigrants. Won't work if the jobs aren't there. Fantastic for capital, more cheap labour. Hurrahs in boardrooms across the nation.

This is Kenney and Tories making sure they get an ample supply of curry votes in the future. Taxpayers can just make up the financial shortfall, no problem. Just build more subsidised housing. This great leadership at work.


Canada News: Ottawa



Ottawa’s insistence on high immigration levels during downturns questioned in report

Published On Tue Apr 3 2012



A new report on immigration outcomes questions Ottawa’s insistence on maintaining Canada’s high immigration levels despite a recession.

Bringing in a huge number of immigrants during an economic downturn could create an underclass of new Canadians caught up in adversity, said the study by the Institute for Research on Public Policy.

“During recessions, economic outcomes deteriorate more among recent immigrants than among the Canadian-born,” said the report, “Making it in Canada: Immigration Outcomes and Policies,” to be released Wednesday.

“It also helps prevent longer-run economic ‘scarring’ that can occur when new labour market entrants are unable to obtain jobs or are unable to practice their skills over a long period.”

In 2010, Canada accepted 280,636 permanent residents, the highest level in over 50 years.

The paper also raised concerns over Ottawa’s drastic shift to gear immigrant selection more toward short-term, narrowly defined labour market needs, because demand for specific occupations can change quickly with the business cycle.

For instance, during the IT boom in 1990s, Canada launched a special program to target newcomers with backgrounds in computer science and engineering. The group was the hardest hit in the 2000 IT bust.

While Ottawa’s recent policy changes — tightening requirements, prioritizing applications with arranged employments and expanding the temporary foreign workers program — can address skills shortages in the short term, it runs the risk of swinging too far off the balance, the report said.

“We are going in the right direction, but we may be moving a bit too far,” said McMaster University economics professor Arthur Sweetman, who co-wrote the report with Garnett Picot, former director-general of research at Statistics Canada.
“It’s not bad to be a bit short-term, but how short-term do you want it to be?” asked Sweetman.

It is too early to assess the impact of the recent changes, but Sweetman said Canada needs to balance immigrants’ short-term economic outcomes with their long-term success, reflected partially in the second-generation’s performance.

The report said children of immigrants are doing as well as, or better than, those of Canadian-born parents. However, second-generation members of a visible-minority group, on average, have higher unemployment rates and lower earnings than their white third-plus-generation counterparts.

University graduation rates among children of immigrants from:
Africa: 50.1%
Caribbean: 27.8%
Latin America: 23.3%
China: 62.4%
Philippines: 33%
India: 50.1%
West Asia, Middle East: 41.1%
Other Asia: 44.8%
United States: 35.1%
United Kingdom: 33.3%
Germany: 33%
Italy: 31.4%
Portugal: 17.4%
Netherlands: 30%
Other northern and Western Europe: 36.8%
Eastern Europe: 41.1%
Other Europe: 34.5%

Children of Canadian-born parents: 23.8%
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
That is because we don't invest in our Canadian born children instead we rent out
spaces to foreign students. We should be treating education as an investment
rather than an expense.
 

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
A good example of how our govts are becoming govts of the elite and have forgotten about those making less than $40,000/yr. But then, those who make less money, vote less. So we get the govt we deserve. We don't need more immigrants, but big biz does.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,295
11,385
113
Low Earth Orbit
It's your responsibility to see your child is educated, don't expect everyboody else to do your job for you.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Although being very active in the eduction of my sons, the wife, and our community of friends are firm believers in "It takes a village to raise a child".
 

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
You can't use Tory and leadership in the same sentence,not with a straight face anyway.

Totally.


I read that in the old days, janitors working at universities often got a deal in that their children could attend university at a discount. Now, the hardass business types have contracted out all this work so these lowly paid employees are no longer university employees and thus have less chance to send their kids to university. A little bit of evidence that the second generation of immigrants won't be doing as well as in decades past. University is now more expensive and their parents are making less. We may be getting the underclass the hardass business types crave. Go Harper.