A vote kind of like Russia where only the chosen get to run?
What does that mean exactly? In our system each party has a leader that 'is chosen' and independents don't stand a chance to be the majority. Nor are the 'winners' ever shackled to keeping any campaign promise. I don't follow their politics all that much but it seem they were doing about the same as the rest of the world, if the leaders saw a population as being an obstacle they were killed off. Same method that was used throughout the world at that time. Marginal existence for the population and the output. Long story short, the elect/slave government became the rule and the plan might have worked if the main industry was making real war equipment for an imaginary war. It went until it crashed heavily. On a rebound things changed, defensive equipment is many times cheaper and simpler, the old hardware got new software, very cheap and advances are fast compared to designing a better shell.
That brings us to today, seems the arrest the West downplayed was by the one where the head of an US led NGO was the one being arrested on charges of 'vote tampering'.
Exactly. And opposition gets arrested... media gets shut down, etc.
Yet when Hugo takes charge the opposition (international corporations staff) runs away leaving a few patsies behind. The media actually starts reporting things that are important to the people before the entertainment shows. (once the media actually gets to all the people, another broken )All you are doing is showing you support a stupid warn out system that never worked properly in the first place for the majority as (if given a vote) that is the system they would vote for, after all being unemployed would make one a corporation (in name only).
Isn't this the same as being 'chosen' as leader of the 'humane' free world? Even the most ruthless terrorist or assassination network knows the public (that he depends on) will not support a person who is 'already dieing of cancer' being killed in a public and messy way.. In the spy industry, is that that called a back-fire?