Quote: Originally Posted by Dixie Cup
Unless I'm missing something, she may well have a case.
I think you are in error
Her public displays will be front and center
Her letting her husband use her offices, communications equipment - Owned by the Govt of Canada - so he could conduct business.
Her writing a letter in support of her Husbands company - Misuse of office
He was convicted of drunk driving - cocaine charge was dropped.
The Ethic Commissioner found her and him in conflict with Govt Policies.
But she can always stand on her reputation.
Back home we would call that standing in a shzt pile.
Just my humble but well informed opinion.