Book Review: Avoid Eating All Grains

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
I was wondering why some people are getting allegic to so many foods. People can't drink milk in growing numbers too. Our food is being manipulated by agrobusiness in the name of greater production and profits. Good for the 3rd world, but not so good for the rest of us necessarily. Food quality is going downhill, no surprise here.

I won't stop eating grain/bread any time soon. They should go back to make safer seeds like in the old days.


Doctor's advice? Cut out all wheat products


Doctor's advice? Cut out all wheat products



U.S. cardiologist says destructive dietary ingredient causes rashes, diabetes, colitis and more



By Tracey Tufnail, Vancouver Sun November 14, 2011


Wheat Belly: Lose the Wheat, Lose the Weight, and Find Your Path Back to Health
By William Davis M.D.
(Rodale books, $29.99)

Like many cardiologists, Wisconsin-based Dr. William Davis has restored good health to thousands of his patients with his advice on dietary changes to improve the wellbeing of their hearts. Unlike most cardiologists, the diet Davis recommends doesn't comply with any official stamp of nutritional approval.

Yet he seems to get some startling results, not only with the heart and circulatory conditions his patients see him for but also a wide variety of other health complaints, including skin rashes, diabetes, colitis, joint pain and insomnia.

His dietary advice is simple: avoid wheat. All wheat, even that wholegrain or organic stuff everyone tells you is superior and heart healthy. Davis says the world's most popular grain is also the world's most destructive dietary ingredient.
The reasons why are not so simple, however, and rooted in the development of wheat since the middle of last century, and the commendable desire to find a solution for world hunger.

Davis's theory begins with the development of hybridized dwarf and semidwarf strains to increase yield (shorter stalks eliminated the buckling found when fertilizer increased head size). More than 99 per cent of wheat grown worldwide is now from these strains, and the hybridization of two wheat strains was never seen by agricultural scientists as a problem.

After all, you cross a tomato with another tomato and you still get a tomato, right?

Davis says 'wrong;' analysis of hybrid wheat compared to its parent strains shows 95 per cent of the proteins in the offspring are the same, while five per cent are unique and not found in either parent.

It is these unique characteristics that Davis links to what he says is endemic wheat sensitivity (Davis says 70 per cent of those who suffer from wheat sensitivity have no digestive symptoms, scarily enough).

Modern wheat is highly addictive and worse for diabetics than pure sugar, Davis says, but the most startling of his conclusions is that the destructive immune response caused by gluten sensitivity also affects your brain.

Davis links wheat to seizures, dementia and even brain damage.

He tells us that wheat consumption is a major cause of the belly fat that triggers inflammation, an underlying indicator of problems like diabetes, hypertension and heart disease. Other health conditions linked to this visceral fat include dementia, rheumatoid arthritis and colon cancer. Cutting out wheat can also improve the symptoms of acid reflux and irritable bowel syndrome.

Davis has an amusingly dramatic and colloquial writing style that most readers will appreciate as making science entertaining, and cites 16 pages of studies to back up his theories.

He provides advice on how to go about removing wheat from your diet - the actual diet he recommends goes further afield than wheat, recommending all grain carbohydrates be treated with caution - and where to look for hidden wheat (if you find you are really sensitive to wheat, girls, check the ingredients of your lipstick).

He also includes some recipes, including for bread alternatives, such as wraps. The recipes are not too exciting, but Davis is a cardiologist, remember, not a chef.

So what if you eat a couple of slices of whole wheat toast every morning? Will you get sick?
The good doctor says 'yes' in answer to that question, recently asked on his blog. "Not sick in terms of vomiting and diarrhea. Sick in terms of knee and hip arthritis, acid reflux, diabetic and pre-diabetic sugars, small LDL particles leading to heart attack and stroke, the phenomena of glycationlike cataracts, neurologic impairment like ataxia, peripheral neuropathies, and dementia.

You will likely not even suspect wheat had a role in your deteriorating health. You will, more than likely, just wither away and spend eternity in the great wheat field in the sky."

"But I couldn't give up wheat," I hear you cry.

In our processed, time-crunched world, it isn't easy, I'll give you that. It takes a mind-shift.

I know. I gave up eating it in July, coincidentally several weeks before I even heard about this book. I have lost 23 pounds and had a marked improvement in my arthritis pain. Wheat-free feels so good I doubt I will ever go back.
Davis isn't a lone voice in the nutritional wilderness; he is just the loudest and latest to question the food pyramid paradigm's relevance to modern health, particularly in relation to the obesity and diabetes epidemics.
It's pretty obvious to me that the ways we have been combating these problems until now are not working, just as I know first-hand that following a low-fat, high-grain weight loss diet doesn't work for me, no matter how meagre the calorie allowance or how many miles I walk.

And I doubt I am unique in that.

Davis doesn't claim all obesity stems from the consumption of wheat, but he provides a compelling explanation of why some people can't lose weight by following official nutrition guidelines.

If you are overweight, feel unhealthy, or simply want to pursue good health, it is worth giving it a whirl.
Davis suggests after five days wheatfree any withdrawal symptoms should disappear and you should start feeling better (for me it only took three).

After all, what do you have to lose except your wheat belly, bagel butt or biscuit face?


 

Corduroy

Senate Member
Feb 9, 2011
6,670
2
36
Vancouver, BC
No grain
No dairy
No red meat
No cured meats
No fish (mercury)
No eggs

Looks like I'm stuck with chicken salad, coffee and cigarettes.
 

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
Four of your items attack the family farm and farms as we know them. The countryside is getting bad PR these days, maybe because it's not run by farmers anymore, but faceless, greedy corporations.

I've seen non-wheat beer. There's wine, water, Kool-ade, pop too.
 

VanIsle

Always thinking
Nov 12, 2008
7,046
43
48
After all, what do you have to lose except your wheat belly, bagel butt or biscuit face?
Oddly enough - try cutting out all sugars (that includes carbs because they turn to sugar when you eat them). I am losing weight. I'm on a diet of bacon and eggs every morning and the eggs can be fried in butter (if I could handle eating them like that). Or my other breakfast option is non-diet cottage cheese with some almonds or pecans. For lunch and/or dinner - I can have pork chops/steak/roast/fried chicken, stir fry etc. etc. I can have carbs but they are only things like - broccoli, cauliflower, squash, some onion, but no carrots, no corn, no peas, no pasta, potatoes and no bread. The only salad dressing is oil & vinegar. I can't handle that so - I eat it without any. For a treat at night - I can have up to one oz. of 85 - 100% dark chocolate and/or a glass of red wine. I don't drink wine. I don't like it.
I read this diet that stated - eat butter - no margarine, no diet foods. I had only one thought - Either I'll lose weight like it says or - I'll be a beach ball with arms. My usual breakfast is 1/2 cup raisin bran with 1% milk. I cannot have it. This is a 14 day diet you can use as often as you like. Milk is a no no. Half and half cream or whipping cream, you can have because they don't have sugar. The powers that be years ago said don't eat fat so people dropped milk and turned to juice and pop. Tons of sugar. But for the 14 days, even milk has sugar. Fruit is limited. A palm full of grapes, half a small orange and 1/3 of a banana. You get snacks in the day - deli meat or nuts. Things that don't have sugar. This is for controlling belly fat. It works. The sugar cravings just go. I don't eat bread but - I do miss having a slice of bread at lunch.
I did this diet for the 14 days and in the first 6 days - lost 6 pounds and my waist dropped by 2.5 inches. Over the next 8 days, I only lost a half pound and nothing off my waist. I thought it was a failure. I stuck to the diet so I don't know why I didn't lose more. I went back to semi regular eating. I could feel myself shedding weight but I didn't let myself believe it. I don't know if I gained the weight back. I went by the way things fit. I'm on the diet again but - in the middle of it, I took a day off. I'll see now how that goes. It all seems backwards.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Was joke comrade.

My wife deals with people with food sensitivities and just published a cook book for cooking without sugar, wheat and yeast. Of the three yeast is probably the worst.
Called The Free Cookbook-available at amazon.com
I am now limited to beer made under German purity laws. No yeast or chemicals. Much better than Canadian swill.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
I'm allergic to cyanide and hard work----Kidding....I don't know of any food I'm allergic to.:smile:
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
I was wondering why some people are getting allegic to so many foods. People can't drink milk in growing numbers too. Our food is being manipulated by agrobusiness in the name of greater production and profits. Good for the 3rd world, but not so good for the rest of us necessarily. Food quality is going downhill, no surprise here.

I won't stop eating grain/bread any time soon.




In the old days (60 years ago) we used to eat what was put in front of us, or we waited until the next meal when it would still be there waiting for us so we learned to tolerate all foods very well. Maybe the younger generation should get back to that custom.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
My wife deals with people with food sensitivities and just published a cook book for cooking without sugar, wheat and yeast. Of the three yeast is probably the worst.
Called The Free Cookbook-available at amazon.com
I am now limited to beer made under German purity laws. No yeast or chemicals. Much better than Canadian swill.
Is it called: Fresh from Elizabeth's Kitchen: Gluten-free & Allergy-Free Recipes? or the free cookbook?
 

VanIsle

Always thinking
Nov 12, 2008
7,046
43
48
In the old days (60 years ago) we used to eat what was put in front of us, or we waited until the next meal when it would still be there waiting for us so we learned to tolerate all foods very well. Maybe the younger generation should get back to that custom.
In the old days JLM, if you were not home when dinner was served - you didn't get any because someone would have eaten your share! The other thing is - to be fair - there are numerous food allergies, the most common being fish. There are lots of people with peanut allergies and that is a deadly allergy. There are lots of people with shell fish allergies. When a doctor tells me that one teaspoon of prawns is all it will take to kill me, I listen and I don't eat prawns. It's not a matter of getting back to any custom of eating what is put in front of me but I do agree with you in that kids today are super fussy. I have grandkids who will eat almost everything and one who is so fussy you just can't please him with anything.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
In the old days JLM, if you were not home when dinner was served - you didn't get any because someone would have eaten your share! The other thing is - to be fair - there are numerous food allergies, the most common being fish. There are lots of people with peanut allergies and that is a deadly allergy. There are lots of people with shell fish allergies. When a doctor tells me that one teaspoon of prawns is all it will take to kill me, I listen and I don't eat prawns. It's not a matter of getting back to any custom of eating what is put in front of me but I do agree with you in that kids today are super fussy. I have grandkids who will eat almost everything and one who is so fussy you just can't please him with anything.

True but most allergies come on during life but there are some people who are born with allergies, I have a cousin who was always allergic to eggs among other things, but I think most of the allergies wouldn't show up if people started eating the foods in childhood hence building up an immunity.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
My wife deals with people with food sensitivities and just published a cook book for cooking without sugar, wheat and yeast. Of the three yeast is probably the worst.
Called The Free Cookbook-available at amazon.com
I am now limited to beer made under German purity laws. No yeast or chemicals. Much better than Canadian swill.

How in hell do you make beer without yeast?.....:roll:
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
The only part of your diet you absolutely do not require is meat.

I doubt if there is any single food that is an absolute necessity but the more foods included in your diet the better. Every food contributes something positive although I admit certain ones like sugar, salt, animal fat need only be eaten occasionally.