What Kind Of Ally Is Canada To The USA In Regard To Security?

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
Not very good. When it comes to security we let in a transnational jihadist, we're weak on terrorist groups, the Indian govt considers Canada not India as a font of Internationa Sikh extremism, MPs shy away from questions how our politcoburacurcy may be infiltratted.
A 2007 Environics poll found 12 per cent of Canadian Muslims - up to 119,000 people - could sympathize with a Toronto 18-type mass-casualty plot.

Time for the political system to be less PC, more willing to offend for the good of the country. Too much caution distorts our political process. It's far less a matter of throwing people in jail, and far more restricting them access to the country in the first place and throwing them out when they commit illegal acts. And developing some backbone and challenge those who discredit democracy.



Ten years later, what kind of ally is Canada?


Business




Ten years later, what kind of ally is Canada?







By David Harris, Calgary Herald September 7, 2011








Twin towers burn




The approaching tenth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks marks a critical point in Canada-United States relations. This milestone should remind us that allies' support and confidence are decisive to a country's survival and prosperity. In Canada's case, prosperity and public safety require access to U.S. borders and to American diplomatic, military and intelligence channels. This access depends on U.S. confidence in Canada as a security partner.

Well before 9/11, I testified before a congressional subcommittee concerned about the Canadian Security Intelligence Service's 1998 warning that more terror groups were in Canada than in any other country, except perhaps the U.S. Imagine American officials' discomfort with today's Canadian security problems.

Canadian-based Sikh extremists caused the world's biggest pre-9/11 aviation-terror disaster, the 1985 Air India bombing. Today, India's security officials privately regard Canada - not India - as a font of international Sikh extremism.

CSIS director Richard Fadden warned of illicit foreign-influence operations in Canada. One or two provincial cabinets could be penetrated, he said, as might local governments. Yet MPs shy away from asking whether Canada's politicobureaucratic system is infiltrated.

American congressional leaders recently stopped Chinese telecom giant Huawei's plan to buy into the U.S. market. Huawei denies links with Beijing, but the company partnered with sensitive Canadian telecom systems and got a $6.5 million Ontario grant without debate. Now Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird dubs America's strategic Chinese foe an "ally" and declares unreconstructed Beijing the political equal of democratic post-war Germany and post-Soviet Russia.

Canada's growing Islamist threat is becoming an export, and American security sources say they know it.
Convicted in Chicago, Pakistani-born Canadian Tahawwur Hussain Rana plotted against Danish publishers of Muhammad cartoons.
Canadians reportedly kill for al-Shabab in Somalia.

Federal computer software consultant, Momin Khawaja, was a transnational jihadi.

Fateh Kamel's Canadian group ran international operations. Meanwhile, a 2007 Environics poll found 12 per cent of Canadian Muslims - up to 119,000 people - could sympathize with a Toronto 18-type mass-casualty plot.

Some Canadian Muslim moderates say radicals dominate many Canadian mosques. Radical influence seeps into Canadian educational institutions, shaping Canadian minds in ways hostile to North American security. Ethnocultural community members warn about infiltration threats in Canadian public administration and the private sector.

Many moderate Muslims want the RCMP's inept Community Outreach program shuttered for legitimizing radical elements through outreach "engagement."

In 2010, an Ottawa outreach committee RCMP officer encouraged attendance at an RCMP diversity committee member's "peace conference," sponsored by four Green party members.

The conference agenda featured senior Tehran University faculty, and an Iranian "peace" activist whose website had a cartoon of a hook-nosed Jew. Imam Zijad Delic, then the Canadian Islamic Congress's executive director, was originally scheduled; on his watch, the C.I.C. brought Yvonne Ridley - Taliban apologist and Iran Press TV reporter - to speak in Canada. All this while our soldiers were fighting and dying at the hands of the Taliban to help liberate Afghan women and citizens.


Canadian author Tarek Fatah suggested the defence department was infiltrated, its own National Capital Region Defence Visible Minority Advisory Group facilitating an invitation - later cancelled - to have Delic appear at a departmental Islamic celebration. Fatah spoke of the group's Canadian "military officers who are Muslim, of Pakistani and Egyptian descent, who used their position in the visible minority caucus at DND to stage this invitation."

This reinforces suspicions that Islamists in government launder controversial Muslims by facilitating speaking invitations for them.
Canada's intellectuals have disappointed, too. Despite Tehran's crimes, the Canadian International Council joined the University of Ottawa in an Iran conference, inviting National Iranian American Council's Titra Parsi, commonly considered a Tehran fellow-traveller.
(He eventually withdrew.) The Council's Hamid Jorjani refused an event media pass to a journalist who had been critical of Iran. Conference sponsors included DND and the federally funded Canadian Association for Security and Intelligence Studies.
Canada's immigration and refugee malaise accounts for much of the deteriorating security situation. Immigration Minister Jason Kenney has turned Canada into the biggest per capita immigration receiver on the planet: 281,000 annually for a population of less than 34 million - closer to 600,000, counting visa-holders. Essentially vote-importing, this costs Canada about $23 billion a year net and many come from antagonistic countries.

"Public safety and social cohesion," says leading Pakistani-Canadian Muslim commentator, Raheel Raza, "demand an immediate moratorium on immigration to Canada from Pakistan, Somalia and other radical-Islamist and terrorist-producing countries." Pakistan is among Canada's top 10 immigrant source countries. This idea should at least be discussed.

My pre-9/11 Congressional testimony warned of Canada's increasing vulnerability to terrorism, radical infiltration and illicit influence.
Today, many American authorities ponder Canada's reliability as an ally and guarantor of their northern front.

They - and Canadians - must ask whether Canada is doing enough to behave like a reliable ally with a secure future.
David Harris, director of the International Intelligence Program of INSIGNIS Strategic Research Inc., is a lawyer with 30 years in intelligence affairs. This is based on a longer article appearing in the Summer 2011 edition of Diplomat and International Canada magazine.

© Copyright (c) The Calgary Herald








 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,389
11,448
113
Low Earth Orbit
If you ndon't like Jihadists and al Qaeda phone your MP and say "stop ****ing hiring them to do your dirty work".
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
File the above under shameless fear mongering

Number of people allegedly responsible for the events of 9/11, who entered the US from Canada: 0

Number of people who entered the US from Canada and committed terrorist attacks: 0

Canada takes these threats seriously. Which is why our record has been exemplary. One notable failure was the Air India bombing, but a lot has changed since then.

Also one of the problems with the Air India bombing investigation was the RCMP's lack of ability to infiltrate the Sikh extremist community, which is why the RCMP (and CSIS) recruits from all ethnic groups.

http://www.csis-scrs.gc.ca/bts/rlfcss-eng.asp

Job Summary

The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) is looking for dedicated individuals to fill the position of Foreign Language Communications Analyst. The Service is looking for individuals with the following language proficiency: Mandarin, Russian, Punjabi/Urdu, Arabic, Tamil and Somali. This position will interest individuals who are able to translate into one or more foreign languages and who are able to work effectively as part of a team.They must have research, analysis, and report writing skills and be keenly interested in intelligence and politics. These Communications Analysts will work at various regional offices of the Service. Applicants must be fluent in a foreign language, must be motivated and discreet, and be comfortable working with computer systems.
http://www.intelligencematters.ca/en/jobs/foreign-language-communications-analyst

So far the RCMP and CSIS have protected Canada much better than their American counterparts. All Canadians should be grateful and proud of the people who protect us,
 
Last edited:

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
The problem is that for many Canadian companies that want to do business in the USA, especially if they are in the technology sector, lax security checks hinder business as the USA will just say there are too many questions here and go elsewhere. Aloowing in 600,000 people per year, most of whom are not security checked, is a problem. Our system of everything is fine until something goes wrong doesn't go down well with the USA.

It's okay below, it was said by an Asian, that immigration from Pakistan, Somalia should be stopped. But no, in Canada, protecting the country is racism itself if you even mention non-whites in any manner. Immigration from these and other countries need to be stopped and reduced.

"Public safety and social cohesion," says leading Pakistani-Canadian Muslim commentator, Raheel Raza, "demand an immediate moratorium on immigration to Canada from Pakistan, Somalia and other radical-Islamist and terrorist-producing countries." Pakistan is among Canada's top 10 immigrant source countries. This idea should at least be discussed.

MPs are in terror asking questions how our politicobureacuracy has been infiltrated by foreign elements. No truth here required.
 

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
I still have a problem wrapping my mind around how Canada's "security" or "lack of security" has anything to do with the u.s.'s "security". The u.s.'s border security is their responsibility not ours. Who does or does not get into their country is their responsibility and not ours.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
I still have a problem wrapping my mind around how Canada's "security" or "lack of security" has anything to do with the u.s.'s "security". The u.s.'s border security is their responsibility not ours. Who does or does not get into their country is their responsibility and not ours.

I think it is a mutual thing but if someone gets in here through Canada and we don't catch him it's our fault. Our borders are so darn pourous to begin with; North, South, and coastal.
 

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
I still have a problem wrapping my mind around how Canada's "security" or "lack of security" has anything to do with the u.s.'s "security". The u.s.'s border security is their responsibility not ours. Who does or does not get into their country is their responsibility and not ours.

According to thousands of Canadian businesses, they all disagree with you as they have to fill our form after form and wait longer and longer at the border to ship product south. That means, the place that takes 75% of our exports, about 40% of GDP, means a lot of jobs. Why should we give safe passage to people who wish to do others harm? A country is supposed to use international law for its own benefit and if that means screening out undesireables, some who may not even have a criminal record, then it can do it.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
There's a 2 billion dollar construction site we are working on here in Ottawa for our new department of homeland security.

Can't remember how its called, but its on its way.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
According to thousands of Canadian businesses, they all disagree with you as they have to fill our form after form and wait longer and longer at the border to ship product south. That means, the place that takes 75% of our exports, about 40% of GDP, means a lot of jobs. Why should we give safe passage to people who wish to do others harm? A country is supposed to use international law for its own benefit and if that means screening out undesireables, some who may not even have a criminal record, then it can do it.


Again, Canada is NOT responsible for american border security anymore than Canada is responsible for British, French, or Russian border security. Canada does not and can not allow ANYONE into the u.s.
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,617
2,365
113
Toronto, ON
Again, Canada is NOT responsible for american border security anymore than Canada is responsible for British, French, or Russian border security. Canada does not and can not allow ANYONE into the u.s.

I believe the idea floating around is a stronger border around North America and a weaker one between the USA & Canada. This would allow commerce, goods and citizens of both Canada & USA to cross across each others borders easier. The only way this works is if the each country knows that the other country has the same security as they do.

Personally, I would rather leave Canadian security to Canada and USA security to the USA and pay the price of a bit of hassle crossing the 49th parallel.