Cuts coming to Environment Canada: reports

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83


Cuts coming to Environment Canada: reports


Reports are emerging that Environment Canada will soon announce a wave of job cuts that will eliminate hundreds of staff from the department. Environment Canada may be set to send nearly 800 employees out the door, including more than 200 scientists, meteorologists and engineers.

Green leader Elizabeth May says Ottawa is not providing enough details to allay concerns that Environment Canada may be harmed by the cutbacks. "There are too many questions and no good answers regarding this slashing of a critical government department," May said in a statement released Wednesday night.

The Toronto Star, meanwhile, is reporting that senior managers at Environment Canada have told union members that they do not have enough funding to pay for the employees on their payroll.

CTV Ottawa- Union confirms job cuts coming to Environment Canada - CTV News
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
75
Eagle Creek
Kelly McParland: Cut the budget, ruin the world as we know it | Full Comment | National Post

"The reason governments have so much trouble balancing their budgets is because no expenditure can ever be cut, for any reason, without disaster, impoverishment and social injustice ensuing."

"So you see? Governments can’t cut costs because we’d all go uneducated, uncared-for and unprotected. We’d freeze in the dark of our own homes and our children would wander the streets aimlessly. And we wouldn’t know whether it’s going to rain on Saturday. It’s a wonder we made it this far. How did the planet manage to get to the 21st century before we had governments that knew how to care for us?"
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Union confirms job cuts coming to Environment Canada

Environment Canada has sent notice to hundreds of employees that they will be affected by a wave of job cuts that will take place over the next 90 days.Gary Corbett, the president of the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada, says his union received notice about the pending cuts on Monday.

"These type of announcements cause a lot of havoc in the department and people are certainly wondering what is going to happen now," Corbett told CTVNews.ca in a telephone interview on Thursday morning.

Corbett said a total of 776 Environment Canada employees have since received notices that they will be affected by the job cuts, though not all of them will ultimately end up leaving the department. Some employees will be moved into new positions within the department, while others will be offered new jobs in other parts of the public service.

"The department has quite clearly said that they expect 300 (employees) to be surplused," said Corbett. But Corbett said it is not a simple process to uproot scientists and other professionals from Environment Canada into other jobs.

Dozens of physical scientists and engineers within the department have received notices, as have a smaller number of chemists and meteorologists.

The pending cuts have also raised concerns that Environment Canada will be hard-pressed to deliver the services it is required to provide with diminished staff capacity. "At the very least, the Harper government owes the public clear explanations of how the core activity of Environment Canada will not be harmed by these layoffs. What is the timeline and what areas of the department will be affected? How will we ensure that critical roles are not left vacant?" Green Leader Elizabeth May said in a statement released Wednesday night.

"There are too many questions and no good answers regarding this slashing of a critical government department."

The Environment Canada website says the department has more than 7,000 employees, which implies that about 1 in 10 workers will be affected by the pending job cuts.

CTV Edmonton - Union confirms job cuts coming to Environment Canada - CTV News

Kelly McParland: Cut the budget, ruin the world as we know it | Full Comment | National Post

"The reason governments have so much trouble balancing their budgets is because no expenditure can ever be cut, for any reason, without disaster, impoverishment and social injustice ensuing."

"So you see? Governments can’t cut costs because we’d all go uneducated, uncared-for and unprotected. We’d freeze in the dark of our own homes and our children would wander the streets aimlessly. And we wouldn’t know whether it’s going to rain on Saturday. It’s a wonder we made it this far. How did the planet manage to get to the 21st century before we had governments that knew how to care for us?"

Preachy fallacious crap.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,389
11,448
113
Low Earth Orbit
Who or what is axed next? There is a reason Mr set elections called an election early. If we waited until November post crash USA, Harper wouldn't have gotten his majority.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
We've lived for thousands of years on unjustified beliefs and we're still living today, so what's the problem?
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Did anyone catch the slight of hand in the budget defeated before the election, and what happened afterwards? The first budget had the government balancing the budget by 2015-16. They forecast a deficit of $0.3 billion for 2014-15...that's almost a tenth of a percent, a rounding error. After the election, they said they would balance the budget by 2014-15, and to do so they will be cutting billions of dollars in spending, about $4 billion a year.

That's fishy math. With stimulus spending winding down, and the economy growing, we could easilly make that target without laying off employees, and without impoverishing the quality of our science that contributes to Canadian quality of life.

Food for the conspiracy theorists, Ottawa has laid out plans this year for greater scrutiny of the impacts of the oil sands projects. So where are we going to lose value, if cuts are coming, and there is to be increased scrutiny of the oil sands? Hurricane forecasts? Drought monitoring? Aviation forecasts?

Fishy.
 

Said1

Hubba Hubba
Apr 18, 2005
5,336
66
48
51
Das Kapital
Who or what is axed next? There is a reason Mr set elections called an election early. If we waited until November post crash USA, Harper wouldn't have gotten his majority.
I work for Stats, you should see them running around like mad chickens, wondering if their going to have a job in October. Large pension pay outs this summer should have tipped them off, but DUH!
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,389
11,448
113
Low Earth Orbit
Food for the conspiracy theorists, Ottawa has laid out plans this year for greater scrutiny of the impacts of the oil sands projects. So where are we going to lose value, if cuts are coming, and there is to be increased scrutiny of the oil sands? Hurricane forecasts? Drought monitoring? Aviation forecasts?

Fishy.
Contracts. Didn't you get the email? Add your MP as a "friend" on fasictbook and you're in on contract science.

I work for Stats, you should see them running around like mad chickens, wondering if their going to have a job in October. Large pension pay outs this summer should have tipped them off, but DUH!
Smart move to call an early election huh?
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
210
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Maybe we should axe G20 parties and get cabinet ministers to ride commercial flights (where they rely on Environment Canada weather prognosticators for many happy landings)
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Depending on which departments get cuts most people will not notice the difference except in the tax savings. The provinces all have environment ministries and there is a huge overlap in interests that cause unnecessary delays in getting economic projects off the ground.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Did anyone catch the slight of hand in the budget defeated before the election, and what happened afterwards? The first budget had the government balancing the budget by 2015-16. They forecast a deficit of $0.3 billion for 2014-15...that's almost a tenth of a percent, a rounding error. After the election, they said they would balance the budget by 2014-15, and to do so they will be cutting billions of dollars in spending, about $4 billion a year.

That's fishy math. With stimulus spending winding down, and the economy growing, we could easilly make that target without laying off employees, and without impoverishing the quality of our science that contributes to Canadian quality of life.

Food for the conspiracy theorists, Ottawa has laid out plans this year for greater scrutiny of the impacts of the oil sands projects. So where are we going to lose value, if cuts are coming, and there is to be increased scrutiny of the oil sands? Hurricane forecasts? Drought monitoring? Aviation forecasts?

Fishy.

Cuts are coming to a Govt Agencies - Along with more spending than the Liberals - Not including the stimulus spending - Harper expanded the Public Service at the same or a faster rate than the Liberals did - Did anyone notice or just choose to blatantly ignore those very public stats
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Pojects all fall under provincial. Science at the Fed level is far more than simple business assesments.

No, anything to do with mines gets both. So do some highways projects. not only is this a duplication of effort and expense they can't do them simutainously, causing unreasonable delays and lost economic growth.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,389
11,448
113
Low Earth Orbit
Well Goobs. I asked a question earlier today which was "has Harper cut an of the international trade iniatives the Libs started?"

I never got an anwser.

No, anything to do with mines gets both. So do some highways projects. not only is this a duplication of effort and expense they can't do them simutainously, causing unreasonable delays and lost economic growth.
Mines only if there is a river involved and highways if a Fed highway like No1 or Yellowhead. There is no overlap.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Well Goobs. I asked a question earlier today which was "has Harper cut an of the international trade iniatives the Libs started?"

I never got an anwser.

Mines only if there is a river involved and highways if a Fed highway like No1 or Yellowhead. There is no overlap.

Are you referring to the Chretien road trips?