The Myth of the World Community

Sparrow

Council Member
Nov 12, 2006
1,202
23
38
Quebec
Well paid lackeys of tyrants, dictators, sheiks and assorted Third World leaders, along with their First World enablers

By Daniel Greenfield Wednesday, October 21, 2009 From the fluttering blue flag of the U.N. with its stylized symbol of the map of the world enclosed by olive tree branches, to the whole collection of global organizations and imagery right down to posters featuring children from every country holding hands, and the rest of the globalist propaganda—Americans have been imprinted as never before from a very early age with the idea that they are part of a global community, rather than merely one nation. But behind the olive branches and the posters of smiling children, lies a very different truth entirely.
The entire notion that there is a world community is itself mostly a myth. The United Nations does represent most of the nations of the world, except for the really unpopular ones. But it does not represent the peoples of the world, only the heads of their regimes. And since most of the UN consists of nations that are not democracies and that do not have truly free and open elections—the UN’s much ballyhooed global community is nothing more than the well paid lackeys of tyrants, dictators, sheiks and assorted Third World leaders, along with their First World enablers.
Paradoxically the more the UN’s membership expanded, the less democratic it became—because most of the nations who joined were not democracies with open elections. As a result the expanding UN became a tool of tyrants, beginning with the USSR which successfully turned the UN into an Anti-Western body to serve its own agenda, with only the Security Council retaining some shards of decency.

The Myth of the World Community

This farce should be dismantled for the good of the world.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
I fully agree with the notion that the world is not integrated as people profess. Just look at all those international aeronautical organizations pretending that they need to coordinate air traffic on a global scale so that planes don't crash into each other and all those pilots and ATCs the world over pretending that they need to communicate with each other.

As far as I'm concerned, we need to put an end to this charade pronto. Let us deal with the air traffic when it enters our borders or, better yet, don't let them in in the firs place.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
I fully agree with the notion that the world is not integrated as people profess. Just look at all those international aeronautical organizations pretending that they need to coordinate air traffic on a global scale so that planes don't crash into each other and all those pilots and ATCs the world over pretending that they need to communicate with each other.

As far as I'm concerned, we need to put an end to this charade pronto. Let us deal with the air traffic when it enters our borders or, better yet, don't let them in in the first place.
That's right, and if two aircraft are heading for the same runway, there is enough room for them to land side by side. Hell, it's bad enough that all international pilots have to speak English...;-):smile:
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
That's right, and if two aircraft are heading for the same runway, there is enough room for them to land side by side. Hell, it's bad enough that all international pilots have to speak English...;-):smile:

Exactly:lol:

And then they have the nerve to pretend we need international organization of air traffic. What about our sovereignty? We must ground all aircraft right away.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Exactly:lol:

And then they have the nerve to pretend we need international organization of air traffic. What about our sovereignty? We must ground all aircraft right away.

Yes, and all aircraft in the air must be ordered to set a course for the shortest way to the ground without damaging private property...;-):-?
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
Agreed.

But seriously, this great globalist conspiracy is trying to make us believe that we need global safety standards, etc. I mean, come on. Just look at the maritime navigation. It would do just fine without it. Just look at the video below. This is the kind of trype the globalist propagandists try to through our way. But anyone with half a brain knows that if that British ship just stayed within its own waters all would be just fine:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noUyaoGlvBg
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
If your car could travel at the speed of light, would your headlights work? question asked by Boswell D. Rabbitsmith
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
You cannot travel at the speed of light. As you travel faster, time slows and the relative speed of light appears unchanged. Your question is sort of like if you drive fast enough, will the back of your car catch up to the front of your car?
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
First I must say, I have no idea what the real answer to the question is. "If your car could travel at the speed of light would your headlights work?"
But do sort of like this answer.
First, what is the speed of light. It is a constant at which a photon travels from one point to another. This rate of travel is universally known as 299,792,458 meters per second. A photon travels at this rate through the vacuum of space without any impedance. Since a photon has no weight it can also be thought to maintain this speed even within dense atmospheres.
Now the summarization of special relativity and how it answers the above question. Remember first that movement is relative. If we are in a moving vehicle and jump we do not, all of a sudden, fly backwards. We are moving relative to the speed of the vehicle we are in. Therefore, comes the first possible way to explain the question. Since the car is moving at the speed of light the photons projected from the head lights would be moving at this same relative speed before being projected out into space. Therefore, of course the lights would work, because there actual speed would be the speed of light plus the speed of light that they throw off. Another explanation could be no they do not work. The speed of light is a constant. If something reaches this speed a photon could not individually exceed that speed and so would not exit the lamp. Relativity basically means that we see things relative to our position. Movement in these terms is a concept based on position. We could say that we do not move, but the universe moves around us and be totally justified, despite the scientific evidence. Relativity would then have us believe that the car could move at the speed of light and have its head lights shine, or not. It depends on your perspective. If you are in the car moving quickly along, you possibly perceive no movement. Therefore, because there is no relative movement the photons would exit the head lights.
It can be stated in several different ways, and intelligently argued, but the fact is that no one knows because we haven’t gone that fast yet.

A few facts.
  • A car can reach a rate exceeding the speed of sound (343 meter per second) but is still 874,030 times slower than a photon.
  • A photon is a particle with no apparent mass. It has the characteristics of both a particle and a wave.
  • There are two theories of relativity. Special relativity has to do with movement and general relativity speculates on gravity.