On November 4, 2008, Israel sent commandos into Gaza and killed six members of Hamas in violation of a ceasefire agreement with Hamas. Israel justified their actions with unsubstantiated claims that Hamas was building a tunnel into Israel for the purpose of abducting Israel soldiers.
But Israel never offered any proof to support their claims about the tunnel.
Also Israel carried out the raid the same day Americans elected Obama. A predictable big news day for the US and the world.
UN observers:
Sounds like a deliberate Israeli ceasefire violation to me. But was it justified?
According to a recent Jimmy Carter interview, the tunnel existed but it was completely within Gaza's borders and was defensive in nature, not offensive:
Also from Jimmy Carter:
If Carter is correct, then Israel never held up its side of the truce, they continued to use food as a weapon in violation of international law and their truce agreement with Hamas. Then Israel deliberately and violently broke their truce with Hamas on US election day.
When negotiators tried to get Hamas and Israel to return to the truce, Israel offered to stop attacking Hamas, but refused to stop using food and medicine as a weapon.
Carter's testimony means Israel's recent slaughter in Gaza was deliberate and planned. In other words a premeditated war crime.
I'm open to other explanations... Any Israel apologists care to respond to Carter's version of events?
But Israel never offered any proof to support their claims about the tunnel.
Also Israel carried out the raid the same day Americans elected Obama. A predictable big news day for the US and the world.
UN observers:
...IDF operation in the Gaza Strip and rocket firing at Israel: In the night of 4-5 November, six Palestinians were killed and seven others injured, including two civilians, in the first large-scale Israeli military operation in Gaza since the 19 June ceasefire. According to the IDF, during the Israeli military incursion into Gaza, the IDF destroyed a tunnel leading to the border between Gaza and Israel, which could have been utilized for military attacks on Israel.
On the eve of 4 November, an IDF reconnaissance unit entered Deir el-Balah in central Gaza Strip. Armed clashes broke out between Palestinian militants and Israeli forces. During the first clash, one Palestinian militant was killed and five others injured; four IDF soldiers were also injured. In addition, a Palestinian house was destroyed, and seven of its 23 inhabitants were detained, including several women, one of whom was injured. During the clashes, the IDF demolished green houses, a poultry farm, and water well. Another house was occupied and used as a military post. In retaliation, Palestinian militants fired rockets and mortars towards Israel—some of which landed inside Gaza; no Israeli casualties were reported. Israel fired a missile east of Khan Younis at a group of militants manning a rocket launcher, killing five Palestinians. The clashes continued until the Israeli forces withdrew from Gaza in the early morning hours of 5 November. Qassam fire from Gaza towards Israel continued on 5 November (beyond the reporting period).
OPT: Protection of civilians - OCHA Weekly report (29 Oct-4 Nov 2008) (6 November 2008)
Sounds like a deliberate Israeli ceasefire violation to me. But was it justified?
According to a recent Jimmy Carter interview, the tunnel existed but it was completely within Gaza's borders and was defensive in nature, not offensive:
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=+1]An Interview with Jimmy Carter [/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=+2]The Future of Gaza [/SIZE][/FONT]
....Well, I know what happened in this last ceasefire. I was the one that helped to orchestrate it...
...the agreement was that they would stop all attacks on each other, that Hamas would stop all the rockets and that Israel would open up the supply line going in to supply food and water and medicines and fuel to the one and a half million Palestinians. That was the agreement. Hamas kept their promise I would say 99 percent. Three months there was just one mortar round or rocket fire – no damage done. But Israel did not keep their promise on opening up their supply lines; they only increased to about twenty percent.
But still Hamas kept their promise until the fourth day of November, at which time Israel attacked Gaza militarily because they claimed that there was a tunnel being built. It turned out that the tunnel was completely within the walls of Gaza and there are probably a thousand other tunnels between Gaza and Egypt. But that was what precipitated the breakdown in the ceasefire....
Riz Khan: An Interview with Jimmy Carter
Also from Jimmy Carter:
An Unnecessary War
By Jimmy Carter
hursday, January 8, 2009
....We were unable to confirm this in Jerusalem because of Israel's unwillingness to admit to any negotiations with Hamas, but rocket firing was soon stopped and there was an increase in supplies of food, water, medicine and fuel. Yet the increase was to an average of about 20 percent of normal levels. And this fragile truce was partially broken on Nov. 4, when Israel launched an attack in Gaza to destroy a defensive tunnel being dug by Hamas inside the wall that encloses Gaza.
On another visit to Syria in mid-December, I made an effort for the impending six-month deadline to be extended. It was clear that the preeminent issue was opening the crossings into Gaza. Representatives from the Carter Center visited Jerusalem, met with Israeli officials and asked if this was possible in exchange for a cessation of rocket fire. The Israeli government informally proposed that 15 percent of normal supplies might be possible if Hamas first stopped all rocket fire for 48 hours. This was unacceptable to Hamas, and hostilities erupted....
Jimmy Carter - An Unnecessary War - washingtonpost.com
If Carter is correct, then Israel never held up its side of the truce, they continued to use food as a weapon in violation of international law and their truce agreement with Hamas. Then Israel deliberately and violently broke their truce with Hamas on US election day.
When negotiators tried to get Hamas and Israel to return to the truce, Israel offered to stop attacking Hamas, but refused to stop using food and medicine as a weapon.
Carter's testimony means Israel's recent slaughter in Gaza was deliberate and planned. In other words a premeditated war crime.
I'm open to other explanations... Any Israel apologists care to respond to Carter's version of events?