
Actually it is more black-hearted than that, the Canadian Govt stonewalls every legal action the First Nations have taken in regards to treaties. The First Nations didn't break them the Canadian Govt did (at every opportunity). The cases cannot be allowed to run their course, the Fist Nations would win every single one of them, that would cost the Govt big money. The taxpayer would be on the hook for that cash, so when it comes to the rights of others being upheld it depends if it is going to cost some personal cash. Every taxpaying Canadian will say the First Nations should be more or less equal. Ask them if they should be compensated for broken treaties at the personal cost of $100,000 for each taxpayer and the support for rights goes up in smoke. If those same (not so lovely) people would be in court in a heartbeat if some lawyer approached them with an offer to sue somebody that would net them $100,000 free and clear.
Quote has been trimmed, See full post:
Stealing land, resources, and decimating a local population is the hallmark of western civilization and paint themselves as being the victim.
How naive to think otherwise, to not see through the smoke and mirrors is willfull stupidity, a commodity that will never be in short supply.
The Truth About the Gaza Massacre « P U L S E

Of course there is another " final solution" to the Palestinian "problem"... I'm sure Israel could pass a law and make it legal.

Z:
I believe your problem is that you are having a hard time understanding that peace will only come to this region with a morally correct and just solution. That means these people must have freedom and justice.
But since the concept of morality and justice eludes you Z, maybe this legal information will help answer your question:
All UNRWA is responsible for is making sure these people's basic needs are met. They have no authority to resolve this problem. But they do identify the Palestinian refugee problem as unique and why.
A host country has to agree to accept their refugees. They have not.
Refugees have to agree to live in their host countries. They have not.
In such cases when the country of origin refuses to recognize the right of refugees to return home, they would face international sanctions and pressure until the problem is resolved. In this case, Israel is the exception.
Since Israel, the host nations and the UN has created this unique situation, the UN has been force to pass resolutions specific to the Palestinian refugee problem.
In these UN resolutions regarding the Palestinian refugee problem, the UN has recognized Palestinians as a "people" with "inalienable rights". One of which is their right to return to their homes and property.
For example:
A/RES/3236 (XXIX)
22 November 1974
A "people" is a different classification than a "person". A person can be a refugee, but a "people" is like a "nation" and includes descendants. Also if you notice the wording in section 5, these "people" have a right to regain their rights by "all means".
The Palestinian "people" probably have a legal UN charter right to use military force to regain rights illegally denied them by Israel.
The rights of the Palestinian "people" could be voided by a new UN or UNSC resolution. Until then previous resolutions remain legally binding.

As for natives, I think the native peoples should get to decide if they want to live up to the exact nature of those treaties or re-negotiate by a referendum.

Maybe I'd like to choose that Im still a refugee from Holland? Too bad, so sad. Thats the nature of human suffering and the terror of colonialism. Deal. Like the majority of the planet has.

The Belfour Declaration did not come with a time limit, if you had an ancestor living in that area that got moved you have a claim.
Try being a little bit realistic, what kept your parents (I assume they were the head of the household) from returning. And just what made them refugees in the first place, the Dutch were never an intentionally targeted people.

Well Loon, here is the hypocrisy in that statement.
You stand as a European on Native Land. This land was taken from Native North Americans by Europeans through the unlawful use of force.
And while you yourself did nothing, nor did the Israeli citizens. In your case, the fighting was done even by the ancestors of others, you just immigrated here. So too is the case with more Israelis.
So If a native told you to abandon your house right now and leave , and all your children and their children had to leave Canada too? Would you? And if you didn't would they be right to shoot rockets at your house and try and kill your family?

Nice trap! But sure, I would swim back to Germany. Problem is, would they take me back? I'm no longer a citizen = no rights; would have to beg for asylum!

As for the Natives having the right to shoot and kill me... hm... in a way, yes, if we hadn't made peace and signed certain agreements. I would try to negotiate with them and propose to take one of their many cottages on Lake Huron, and they can have my house here in town.

Zzarkov, aren't you comparing apples with onions? It is not the Palestinians (Natives) who drive the Jews (Europeans) off the land, it's the other way around.

The Jews are in the process of taking the Land away from the Natives to this day! All agreements worked out over the years always failed, because of Israelis not wanting to give back the land unlawfully taken from the Natives.

You and MHz have discussed these issues in the meantime, and eao, and ein Mensch are much more knowledgeable than I could ever be on these topics.
(I've been stuck for the last 2 hours on a site about the Russian Oligarchs - am tired now.)In case anyone is interested, here is the link:
--
2nd page under this heading:
--
Sorry, I see it is in German. Ein Mensch might be interested?

Anyway, Zzarchov, all I wanted to find out was, when did the first Europeans come over here and started to drive the Natives off their land? Was it 1600 something?
Long time ago. We were then like the Israelis are now.


Uh huh. You're logic seems to be that Minorities feel excluded therefore the society is aparatheid. Up until a few days ago, America was much the same. Canada still is, let alone France, Britain or any European country.
No matter how you shake it the facts dispute you.