No Evidence Of Widespread hezbollah 'shielding

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
(Jerusalem, September 6, 2007) – Israel’s indiscriminate airstrikes, not Hezbollah’s shielding as claimed by Israeli officials, caused most of the approximately 900 civilian deaths in Lebanon during the July-August 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. Human Rights Watch investigated more than 500 of the deaths.

Israel wrongfully acted as if all civilians had heeded its warnings to evacuate southern Lebanon when it knew they had not, disregarding its continuing legal duty to distinguish between military targets and civilians. Issuing warnings doesn’t make indiscriminate attacks lawful.
Kenneth Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch.


“Israel wrongfully acted as if all civilians had heeded its warnings to evacuate southern Lebanon when it knew they had not, disregarding its continuing legal duty to distinguish between military targets and civilians,” said Kenneth Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch. “Issuing warnings doesn’t make indiscriminate attacks lawful.”

The 249-page report, “Why They Died: Civilian Casualties in Lebanon during the 2006 War,” represents the most extensive investigation to date of civilian deaths in Lebanon during the war. In five months of research, Human Rights Watch investigated 94 cases of air, artillery and ground attacks by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to discern the circumstances surrounding the deaths of 510 civilians and 51 combatants, nearly half the at least 1,109 Lebanese deaths during the conflict. Of the approximately 510 Lebanese civilian deaths investigated by Human Rights Watch, at least 300 were women or children. Human Rights Watch visited more than 50 Lebanese villages and interviewed 316 victims and eyewitnesses, as well as 39 military experts, journalists and Israeli, Lebanese government and Hezbollah officials.

Human Rights Watch found that a simple movement of vehicles or persons – such as attempting to buy bread or moving about private homes – could be enough to cause a deadly Israeli airstrike that would kill civilians. Israeli warplanes also targeted moving vehicles that turned out to be carrying only civilians trying to flee the conflict. In most such cases documented in the report, there is no evidence of a Hezbollah military presence that would have justified the attack.

the rest in here
Human right watch


Israel Governement will find another excuses for what they have done, just like any criminal organisation.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Have they figured out which secret weapon made the holes in the ambulances yet?

HRW is funnier than Monty Python.
And as far as I'm concerned, Monty Python has more cred!

It doesn't matter that the folks are terrified to testify against the actual criminals in their own backyards...

You damned if you do and damned if you don't :-|
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
Have they figured out which secret weapon made the holes in the ambulances yet?

HRW is funnier than Monty Python.

whatever.......the reason why israel went to lebanon, is because 2 soldier were kidnapped, and to justified their destruction in lebanon, is because hezb were using human shield, none of this was the truth.


By the way what happened to the 2 kidpnaped soldier?

Are they free?

are they alive?


why didnt we hear about it ?
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
The Israeli soldiers remain captive just like dozens of Lebanese soldiers held by Israel. That's why Hezbollah launched their raid. So they could bargain for the release of their soldiers.

By the way, Israel also holds tens of thousands of Palestinian men, women and children captive. I hope Hezbollah is more humane to their POWs than Israel. Its well documented that Israel routinely tortures their prisoners including women and children.

Before the Hebollah raid, its likely Israel was already planning to invade southern Lebanon. It was just a question of when. Hezbollah's raid caused Israel's leaders to move their invasion plans forward. In hindsight, that was a poor decision. Israel's military was not ready to take on an entrenched Hezbollah and as a result they got their butts kicked.

But the war did prove that Israel still has a much better capability to kill innocent civilians and commit war crimes than Hezbollah. It also showed that Hezbollah was far more effective at defending Lebanon than Israel was at invading. Hezbollah should have known that Israel would resort to killing innocent unarmed civilians to compensate for their inability to wage an effective campaign against armed soldiers. If Hezbollah plans to take on Israel again they must either improve their ability to kill innocent unarmed Israeli citizens or their ability to defend innocent unarmed Lebanese civilians.

Hezbollah's successful border raid showed cunning and daring. It was not a terrorist attack, but a legal battle between two nations in a state of war within the agreed terms of the April Understanding.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli-Lebanese_Ceasefire_Understanding

The same cannot be said of Israeli pilots bombing Beruit or other cvilian targets like the bomb shelter in Qana. Bombing cities at altitude because you can is an act of cowardice and a war crime. So is launching rockets at cities. But Hezbollah only declared total war after it became clear that Israel was targetting innocent civilians in violation of the April Understanding. When Hezbollah declared open season on Israeli civilians, Israel had been targetting innocent Lebanese civilians for over 24 hours.

Only soldiers who fought battles against other soldiers without involving civilians can claim to be courageous and fighting with honor. Many soldiers on both sides demonstrated these traits.

Its likely that if Israel hadn't targetted civilians first, then Hezbollah probably would have refrained from launching rockets at Israeli civilians. Any soldier which targets civilians is a war criminal. That even includes attacking civilians in retaliatation for the other sides attacks on your civilians. That makes Hezbollah just as guilty of war crimes as Israel.
 

wallyj

just special
May 7, 2006
1,230
21
38
not in Kansas anymore
You just have to love the slant in this title. No evidence of WIDESPREAD shielding. They just do it every so often when necessary. So the Israeli's should never,ever shoot back because they may hit civilians because the palestinians may have put thier rocket launchers,which are always aimed at civilians,in a schoolyard. Sounds like fair,unbiased reporting to me.Damn joos.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Read the HRW report.

http://hrw.org/reports/2006/lebanon0806/

Israel has every right to attack legitimate targets.

But its a war crime to deliberately target fleeing civilians, civilian homes and bomb shelters. Not to mention deliberately littering Lebanon with millions of unexploded cluster bomblets during the last hours of the conflict in a deliberate attempt to kill innocent Lebanese civilians for years to come. Try to rationalize that as Israel just defending itself. The war was over and that final war crime speaks volumes about the value Israel's leaders place on innocent civilians.

...Cluster munitions spread small bombs over a wide area, many of which do not explode on impact but remain live and lethal. So far the UN Mine Action Coordination Center (MACC) has identified some 770 sites contaminated with an estimated one million unexploded Israeli cluster bombs in South Lebanon. More sites continue to be identified.
Almost all the cluster bombs launched by Israeli forces were launched in the last 72 hours of the conflict – after the ceasefire had been agreed on 11 August....

http://web.amnesty.org/pages/lbn-010906-action-eng

And don't even try to lay the anti-Semitism crap on me. I can find many Jewish Israeli sources which also criticize Israel's leaders for their war crimes.

http://www.hagada.org.il/eng/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=189

Are Jewish Israeli's who dare point out their leader's war crimes also anti-Semitic?
 

Johnny Utah

Council Member
Mar 11, 2006
1,434
1
38
You just have to love the slant in this title. No evidence of WIDESPREAD shielding. They just do it every so often when necessary. So the Israeli's should never,ever shoot back because they may hit civilians because the palestinians may have put thier rocket launchers,which are always aimed at civilians,in a schoolyard. Sounds like fair,unbiased reporting to me.Damn joos.
You just have to look at who posted this thread, it's like all others posted before with a bias title. I think he could be Hezbollah's green helmet man..

Just a note, it's not the damn jooos, it's Da Joooos, Da Joooos..
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
The Israeli soldiers remain captive just like dozens of Lebanese soldiers held by Israel. That's why Hezbollah launched their raid. So they could bargain for the release of their soldiers.
You still haven't grasped the difference between a "Uniformed" Soldier and a "Non Uniformed" Soldier. The Uniformed Soldier is priviledged to the rights and treaties of the Geneva Convention and the International Rule of Law governing the treatment of Soldiers. The Hezbollah, a "Non Uniformed" Army, is not afforded the same rights. This isn't rocket science.

By the way, Israel also holds tens of thousands of Palestinian men, women and children captive. I hope Hezbollah is more humane to their POWs than Israel. Its well documented that Israel routinely tortures their prisoners including women and children.
Torture aside, the mjority of the Palestinian prisoners held by the IDF and Israel, are terrorists or have commited crimes against the state.
Before the Hebollah raid, its likely Israel was already planning to invade southern Lebanon. It was just a question of when. Hezbollah's raid caused Israel's leaders to move their invasion plans forward. In hindsight, that was a poor decision. Israel's military was not ready to take on an entrenched Hezbollah and as a result they got their butts kicked.
Ummm, ya...were you watching the same war?

The IDF didn't get their azzes kicked, they held back and didn't push, due to International pressure.

Lets take a history lesson here...

How many countries attacked Israel the day after she was born, a nation with no formal Army to speak of?

Who won?

They've come along way earth, they have the potential to wipe all their neighbours off the map, but choose not to.
 
Last edited:

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
You still haven't grasped the difference between a "Uniformed" Soldier and a "Non Uniformed" Soldier. The Uniformed Soldier is priviledged to the rights and treaties of the Geneva Convention and the International Rule of Law governing the treatment of Soldiers. The Hezbollah, a "Non Uniformed" Army, is not afforded the same rights. This isn't rocket science.

Torture aside, the mjority of the Palestinian prisoners held by the IDF and Israel, are terrorists or have commited crimes against the state.
Ummm, ya...were you watching the same war?

The IDF didn't get their azzes kicked, they held back and didn't push, due to International pressure.

Lets take a history lesson here...

How many countries attacked Israel the day after she was born, a nation with no formal Army to speak of?

Who won?

They've come along way earth, they have the potential to wipe all their neighbours off the map, but choose not to.


And on what biased source do you say all palestinians prisonners are terrorist? same one who says bill 101 is a theat to poor/victims english in quebec?

So what is your barbarian reason for israel to attack lebanon?
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
You just have to love the slant in this title. No evidence of WIDESPREAD shielding. They just do it every so often when necessary. So the Israeli's should never,ever shoot back because they may hit civilians because the palestinians may have put thier rocket launchers,which are always aimed at civilians,in a schoolyard. Sounds like fair,unbiased reporting to me.Damn joos.


They don,t only twisted-sheep people who hates muslim to their teeth says that, withouth even a single shread of evidence of what you are saying.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
And on what biased source do you say all palestinians prisonners are terrorist?
Please reread my post...it says "majority", not "all". I won't hold my breath, in hopes of you ever getting a grip of the reality of the situation here or there.

same one who says bill 101 is a theat to poor/victims english in quebec?
Nope, I got mine from a statictics site, Bill 101 was seen as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Canada and watered down until only barely acceptable under the law, which was still seen as wrong by the majority of Canadians. Again, I won't anticipate any bulbs going off with regards to you anytime soon.
So what is your barbarian reason for israel to attack lebanon?
huh?
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
You still haven't grasped the difference between a "Uniformed" Soldier and a "Non Uniformed" Soldier. The Uniformed Soldier is priviledged to the rights and treaties of the Geneva Convention and the International Rule of Law governing the treatment of Soldiers. The Hezbollah, a "Non Uniformed" Army, is not afforded the same rights. This isn't rocket science.

That's true, but just because your adversaries aren't all wearing uniforms, doesn't mean its legal to deliberately target civilians. HRW, Amnesty International and other human rights organizations have all documented Israel's war crimes against innocent civilians including a Canadian family.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2006/07/17/qc-family.html

If Hezbollah had killed as many Canadians as Israel did, it probably would have provoked condemnation rather than praise for Israel's "measured" response.

Also what do you make of this incident CB?

Annan: Israeli Commando Raid Violates CeasefireBy VOA News
20 August 2006

...Lebanese security officials say Israeli helicopters unloaded two vehicles carrying troops disguised as Lebanese soldiers. The officials say the Israeli soldiers then drove to the village of Boudai where they were confronted by Hezbollah fighters....

http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2006-08/2006-08-20-voa5.cfm?CFID=142681734&CFTOKEN=75900104

Torture aside, the mjority of the Palestinian prisoners held by the IDF and Israel, are terrorists or have commited crimes against the state.
Ummm, ya...were you watching the same war?

Curious but how do you know this? Were any of these people found to be terrorists and criminals by some sort of due process to determine their status or are you just blindly taking the Israeli government's word. Many of the people Israel's holds are likely guilty of being politicans or related to people of interest.

Yes I watched the war. Remember this headline?

IDF: It'll take week to reach Litani

According to timetable IDF presented to cabinet, it would take troops additional 4-6 weeks to defeat Hizbullah terrorists after reaching Litani...

...The IDF presented the cabinet with a timetable for its operations in the field, by which the operation would take a minimum of one week to reach the Litani River. Another four to six weeks would be required to defeat the Hizbullah operatives in the field....

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3289830,00.html

which was then followed by this headline:


The story claims it was due to diplomatic pressure, but that assertion defies common sense. Israel's soldiers were getting their butts kicked in Lebanon and bombing civilians was a means to blackmail Hezbollah into agreeing to a ceasefire. If it wasn't for all the innocent civilians Israel was killing, Hezbollah would have been willing to keep fighting.

Israel's verdict: We lost the war
By Donald Macintyre in Metulla, Israel

Published: 15 August 2006



Ehud Olmert, the Israeli Prime Minister, was obliged to admit "shortcomings" in the 34-day-old conflict in Lebanon yesterday as he launched what may prove a protracted fight for his own political survival.
Mr Olmert's admission in a stormy Knesset session came in the face of devastating poll figures showing a majority of the Israeli public believes none or only a very small part of the goals of the war had been achieved.
Adding insult to injury, the leader of Hizbollah, Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, crowed on television that his guerrillas had achieved a "strategic historic victory" over Israel....

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article1219280.ece





The IDF didn't get their azzes kicked, they held back and didn't push, due to International pressure.

From the moment Israel crossed the Lebanese border at the beginning of the conflict they started loosing soldiers. The longer they stayed, the more soldiers they lost. Most of the people killed by Hezbollah were soldiers during combat. Most of the people killed by the IDF were civilians killed by bombs dropped by aircraft on cities and villages.

Lets take a history lesson here...

How many countries attacked Israel the day after she was born, a nation with no formal Army to speak of?

Who won?

They've come along way earth, they have the potential to wipe all their neighbours off the map, but choose not to.

What the war proved is that cheap man portable munitions like RPGs and MANPADS can take out expensive tanks and helicopters. We have entered a new era of warfare. The technologies which have historically given Israel an edge are obsolete. Israel got out of the last war by bombing civilian targets until Hezbollah agreed to a ceasefire. I suppose that could be considered a win. Eventually Israel's adversaries will have the same ability and then Israel will be forced to fight a war without targeting civilians.
 

thomaska

Council Member
May 24, 2006
1,509
37
48
Great Satan
What the war proved is that cheap man portable munitions like RPGs and MANPADS can take out expensive tanks and helicopters. We have entered a new era of warfare. The technologies which have historically given Israel an edge are obsolete. Israel got out of the last war by bombing civilian targets until Hezbollah agreed to a ceasefire. I suppose that could be considered a win. Eventually Israel's adversaries will have the same ability and then Israel will be forced to fight a war without targeting civilians.


Well lets hope that happens soon so the Paleoswinians can stop blowing up buses full of civilians and can quit aiming katyusha rockets at elementary schools.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
I disagree with targetting civilians. Wars should be between soldiers. Soldiers/militants which target civilians are war criminals in my view. But your viewpoint that Palestinian militants are the only ones guilty of killing innocent civilians is completely wrong. Please visit this site and compare.

http://www.ifamericansknew.org/

Israeli soldiers kill innocent Palestinian civilians daily.

This Week In Palestine - Week 39 2007

September 28, 2007

...The Gaza strip this week saw the Israeli army intensify their campaign, with air strikes leaving at 13 dead, among them one child. IMEMC's Rami Al Mughari reports:

Two Palestinians were killed and four others injured in Israeli military air strikes on the Beit Hanoun area of the northern Gaza Strip in the early hours of Thursday morning.

Medical sources said that Israeli planes fired rockets at a crowd of civilians, killing the two men and causing serious injuries to four others. The two dead were later named as Raji Hamdan and Mohammad Abu Rukba. A further two Palestinians later died of wounds sustained in the attack.

Seven Palestinians were killed and at least 20 others wounded in two separate Israeli attacks on the Gaza Strip on Wednesday. In southern Gaza city, an Israeli drone fired a missile on a jeep, killing four Palestinians, said to members of the Army of Islam group. Medics and witnesses told IMEMC that at least three other bystanders were injured in the attack.

Meanwhile, Israeli army artillery shelled Palestinian areas in the northern Gaza Strip, killing three and injuring at least 12 others, medics confirmed.

A further 2 were killed on Tuesday when an Israeli air strike targeted two members of the Hamas movement.

Israeli army tanks and armored vehicles reportedly invaded several hundred meters deep into the Gaza Strip on Wednesday. The incursion took place near Beit Hanoun....

http://www.imemc.org/article/50680

Or how about this recent news?
Three Palestinians have been reportedly wounded in southern Gaza after an Israeli shell landed on a local house near the Sofa crossing in eastern Rafah city, media sources said.
Palestinian medics confirmed three people have been wounded including two lightly while the third's hand has been amputated. No further details have been reported.
Earlier in the day, eight Palestinians were injured in several attacks carried by the army in the Gaza Strip.

http://www.imemc.org/article/50770
 

thomaska

Council Member
May 24, 2006
1,509
37
48
Great Satan
I disagree with targetting civilians. Wars should be between soldiers. Soldiers/militants which target civilians are war criminals in my view. But your viewpoint that Palestinian militants are the only ones guilty of killing innocent civilians is completely wrong. Please visit this site and compare.

http://www.ifamericansknew.org/

Israeli soldiers kill innocent Palestinian civilians daily.



Or how about this recent news?

The difference being this...If the Palestinians..whoever they are, since there is no "Palestine" stopped killing first the Israelis would stop also. If Israel stopped shooting completely today, there would still be jihadis blowing up cafes and bustops.

I guess it will never end until they run out of human bomb volunteers.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Palestinians live under a brutal and illegal military occupation. They are subjected to curfews, expulsions, home demolitions, legalized torture, and a highly imaginative assortment of human rights violations by people who recently immigrated to the region. No justifiable comparison can be drawn between the level of official accountability to which Palestinans are held for the actions of a few individuals and the responsibility for the systematic and intense violence against the entire Palestinian population practiced with impunity by the state of Israel.

International law grants a people fighting an illegal occupation the right to use ‘all necessary means at their disposal’ to end their occupation. The Palestinian resistance is as legal and legitimate as the French resistance to Nazi occupation or Black South African resistance to Apartheid.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Israel's Palestinian victims are usually labelled militants by our media.



A militant implies they are associated with a military force and therefore legitimate targets. But when human rights organizations investigate Israel's claims about killing militants, the majority of people Israel kills turn out to be innocent civilians.


May 24, 2007 by
the Independent/UK
Most Palestinians Killed in Israeli Raids were Civilians, Amnesty Says

by Donald Macintyre
JERUSALEM -More than 320 civilians were among a threefold increase in the number of Palestinians killed by Israeli security forces last year, according to Amnesty International. The human rights group’s 2007 report says that over half of the more than 650 Palestinians killed in 2006 were civilians, 120 of them children and young people under 18. Amnesty defines civilians, “as people that are reasonably supposed never to have been involved in armed operations”.
While Amnesty said that dozens of Palestinians were killed in the West Bank it pointed out that most of the increase resulted from aerial and artillery bombardments in Gaza after the abduction of the Israeli corporal Gilad Shalit in late June and in response to increased Qassam rocket fire on Israel. These included, for example, the shelling of a house in the northern town of Beit Hanoun which killed 17 members of the Athamneh family.
The report said 21 Israeli civilians were killed by Palestinians militants in the same year, the lowest figure since the beginning of the second intifada in 2000.
Amnesty also accused soldiers and settlers of committing “serious human rights abuses, including unlawful killings against Palestinians mostly with impunity”. Although it said settler attacks on farmers in the West Bank had decreased, they were continuing.
It said that, at times, security forces were present at such incidents and did not intervene.

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/05/24/1434/

That proves most of what is reported in the news about this conflict is really pro-Israel manipulative propaganda.
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
It's way too late to haul the White Star Line naval architect and welding crews to court to settle who is responsible for sinking the Titanic, the iceberg the design flaws or the ships captain and crew. The same applies to the Israeli Palestinian conflict. The United States and Britain (see Afghanistan, Iraq, anywhere in the world where conflict and violence erupt after these morons have meddled in another nations affairs) becasue the decision was made to plant the Jews in Palestine. Now sure the argument about who "owns" the land can go on and on ad nauseum but the first move was made by "democracies" (Britain and the United States) mismanaging, misunderstanding and mishandling anything and everything they touch that comes into direct contact with foreign policy....

With any luck, America can look forward to spending more billions and shedding more of its children's lives (see Korea) in another stirling move like they're responsible for in Iraq and unless Turkey hands the U.S. its ass (or China or Russia) (the European Union is a toothless dawg) the American created black hole of Iraq will continue for years..... Just like Israel and other regions of "American influence" have entertained the world for decades....

With lovely messes created and left all over the planet, by Britain and the United States we can be assured that folk like Bear will have plenty of opportunity to level heart-warming jibes like ..."retard babies" when "discussing" Israel and Palestine....or how wonderful it is to be involved in Afghanistan......

The entire issue is well beyond reason and resolution when after the time passed and the atrocities commited by both sides are juxtaposed that the lofty intellects of bigots and testosterone junkies are provided the opportunity to vent their spleens in intentional and purposefully personal baiting and demonstrations of disdain for anyone's different opinion.

I wonder can you stick a yellow ribbon on a Star of David and symbolize support for terrorism?