French accused of complicity in genocide

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
that killed a million in Rwanda

An unprecedented public inquiry into France's role in the 1994 genocide in Rwanda held hearings in Kigali last week, where the French army was accused of complicity in massacres of Tutsi. The seven-person examining commission is hearing testimony from 20 survivors, some claiming serious human rights abuses, including rape and murder, by the French military.

The commission is also examining Operation Tur-quoise, the 1994French military intervention that was ostensibly aimed at saving Rwandan lives. Human rights groups in France claim French soldiers tricked thousands of Tutsi survivors out of hiding, and abandoned them to the Interahamwe militia. The three-month genocide claimed up to one million Tutsi victims.

Close links existed between France and Rwanda, the tiny African country ruled by a Hutu dictatorship for 20 years. France was its biggest supplier of heavy military equipment, and sent troops in 1990 to help repel a military offensive from Uganda by the largely Tutsi Rwandan Patriotic Front, (RPF), against the corrupt president, Juvenal Habyarimana.

During nearly three years of civil war, in some instances senior French officers took operational battlefield control. In 1993, an international peace agreement replaced the French with UN peacekeepers, to monitor creation of a power-sharing democracy. For years, the French government denied any part in the genocide. Its own parliamentary enquiry in 1997, calling the genocide one of the greatest tragedies of the century, admitted only that France had underestimated the threat. But the enquiry did reveal that the former French president, François Mitterrand, had largely been responsible for French policy in Rwanda.
By 1994, the Rwandan army had become a "military protégé" of France. Before the genocide, 47 high-ranking French army and gendarmerie officers were with the Rwanda military. French officers were attached to the élite battalions, the Presidential Guard, the para-commandos and the reconnaissance battalion.


In April, 1994, French-trained officers from the Presidential Guard eliminated the pro-democracy and political opposition and French-trained soldiers from the para-commando and the reconnaissance battalion began killing anyone with a Tutsi identity card. The Rwanda Commission has evidence that the French trained the Interahamwe, and French officers were in commando training centres, where torture was perpetrated, and where political opponents disappeared.Yet in meetings of the Security Council to decide UN policy on Rwanda, France had sat silent. Later, the then French ambassador to the UN, Jean-Bernard Mérimée, blamed the UK and US ambassadors for the international failure over Rwanda.

During the genocide, French diplomats told the UN many had died as civil war casualties, diverting attention from systematic massacres of civilians. France refused to allow the Council to invoke the 1948 Genocide Convention to try to stop the genocide. Then after five weeks of murders, France launched its own military intervention, with Council blessing, to secure humanitarian areas for survivors and protect displaced people.This was Operation Turquoise. The French did create a safe zone, but this allowed the political, military and administrative leadership of the genocide to flee. Although the RPF won the civil war, the national treasury, the killers and 37,000 troops moved to Zaire (now the DRC). This is why there are so many fugitive genocidaires; the ringleaders of the genocide took sanctuary in other countries, notably France and Belgium, where they enjoy protection today.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/africa/article1956572.ece
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
And the French have the audacity to complain about the War in Iraq.
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
In April, 1994, French-trained officers from the Presidential Guard eliminated the pro-democracy and political opposition and French-trained soldiers from the para-commando and the reconnaissance battalion began killing anyone with a Tutsi identity card. The Rwanda Commission has evidence that the French trained the Interahamwe, and French officers were in commando training centres, where torture was perpetrated, and where political opponents disappeared.Yet in meetings of the Security Council to decide UN policy on Rwanda, France had sat silent. Later, the then French ambassador to the UN, Jean-Bernard Mérimée, blamed the UK and US ambassadors for the international failure over Rwanda.

During the genocide, French diplomats told the UN many had died as civil war casualties, diverting attention from systematic massacres of civilians. France refused to allow the Council to invoke the 1948 Genocide Convention to try to stop the genocide. Then after five weeks of murders, France launched its own military intervention, with Council blessing, to secure humanitarian areas for survivors and protect displaced people.This was Operation Turquoise. The French did create a safe zone, but this allowed the political, military and administrative leadership of the genocide to flee. Although the RPF won the civil war, the national treasury, the killers and 37,000 troops moved to Zaire (now the DRC). This is why there are so many fugitive genocidaires; the ringleaders of the genocide took sanctuary in other countries, notably France and Belgium, where they enjoy protection today.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/africa/article1956572.ece


I wouldnt be very much surprised of this, after all,france is a country of white-human rights, other minority's rights are just a suggestions, i just think about the fact that some of their ancester made fortune with lumbing african-woods, it just make me pukes.
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
And the French have the audacity to complain about the War in Iraq.


Sorry i don't get it, what does it have to do with iraq?

according to your logic, if a nation did something bad, whatever the time is, then he must shut up reagarding any debates??

Then sorry to tell you this, i think the whole england, should shut up, for the rest of their existance, on any issues, according to your logic.
 

ottawabill

Electoral Member
May 27, 2005
909
8
18
Eastern Ontario
Sorry i don't get it, what does it have to do with iraq?

according to your logic, if a nation did something bad, whatever the time is, then he must shut up reagarding any debates??

Then sorry to tell you this, i think the whole england, should shut up, for the rest of their existance, on any issues, according to your logic.

Logic you don't "get it" because you wear rose colored glasses when it comes to French interests. The U.S. was in Iraq and helping their dictator Sadam years before the war with Iraq. The French government has been very critical of this...Now it seems their hands are just as red in other areas of the world. That doesn't make the UK or U.S. better, but it does make France not so inocent
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
Logic you don't "get it" because you wear rose colored glasses when it comes to French interests. The U.S. was in Iraq and helping their dictator Sadam years before the war with Iraq. The French government has been very critical of this...Now it seems their hands are just as red in other areas of the world. That doesn't make the UK or U.S. better, but it does make France not so inocent


Agree, at the same time, it shoudnt stop them to criticized anything though, same for everyone, but according to black leaf mentality , it is a different story.
 

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
Why should French actions surprise? It was the French, who of all occupied Europe, collaborated most closely with the Nazi regime. It was the French who worked tirelessly to inform on their Jewish neighbours and push them to empty cars at wartime railway depots. There's always been this moral hole in the French soul. Troubling but indisputable.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
65
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Interesting, if true. I wonder why this has not been disclosed if there is any truth to the allegation.

Stateside, Clinton intervened and he was criticized for doing so by Republicans. Yet it will be recalled that he walked the streets of Rwanda unescorted by police. While this should be a sign that his campaign was a success, right wing critics still called him a failure.

If that criticism is valid, then you have to wonder why Bush has not been criticized by those same right wingers for not walking the streets of Baghdad unescorted.


```France and Iraq ... Belgium and Congo ... France and Nazi regime```

England and India ... USA and Central America ... Yes, there is a moral lapse tie-in for all these historical cases.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
Interesting, if true. I wonder why this has not been disclosed if there is any truth to the allegation.

Stateside, Clinton intervened and he was criticized for doing so by Republicans. Yet it will be recalled that he walked the streets of Rwanda unescorted by police. While this should be a sign that his campaign was a success, right wing critics still called him a failure.

If that criticism is valid, then you have to wonder why Bush has not been criticized by those same right wingers for not walking the streets of Baghdad unescorted.


```France and Iraq ... Belgium and Congo ... France and Nazi regime```

England and India ... USA and Central America ... Yes, there is a moral lapse tie-in for all these historical cases.

Slick Willy, badly burned in Somalia, refused to do ANYTHING to help in Rwanda.

However, it was Kofi Annan and Canadian General Baril who completely undercut General D'Allaire's plans to pre-emptively remove the radio station and arms caches later used by Hutus...............

The Rwandans understand that......when Annan visited they lined the streets......and pointedly turned their backs as his car passed.

When did Clinton walk there unescorted?
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
65
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
March, 1998. He told the folks there he wanted something like $25 or perhaps it was $ 80 million per year for hospitals. Forgot offhand all the facts but he did go there and was loved by the people. To this day he is greatly admired in Africa.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
BTW, when did the Rwandans turn their backs on Annan's car?

In1998, shortly after Clinton's visit. I remember the newspaper article at the time, but could not find a piece again on the Rwandans literally turning their back on him.....

Figuratively, however..... http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/rwanda3.htm

For a shocking review of events in Rwanda, read Romeo D'Allaire's book Shake Hands with the Devil. Amazingly, IMHO, D'Allaire remains pro-UN.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
65
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Thanks for your article. I do not remember if this was reported by the USA media but it does appear to make some sense.

Strange isn't it how Annan is not held in high regard in Africa but how Clinton is. I honestly thought Annan had spoken out for intervention but that his words were disregarded to the peril of those Rwandans. But to be honest, much of the turbulence that has taken place in Africa has occured under his watch. And the cycle of violence has never stopped. Despite all his public words against internecine violence, it continues unabated. This, I believe, will be his sad legacy.