Decriminalizing drugs

Will Mexico's decision hurt the war on drugs?

  • No, it will help police focus on stopping larger-scale drug trafficking operations.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes, it may even make Mexico a tourist destination for people seeking drugs.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
U.S. cautious on Mexico plan to legalize drugs
Ambassador says measure could make law enforcement more effective

MEXICO CITY - The United States reacted cautiously on Saturday to a Mexican measure that would make it legal to carry small amounts of cocaine, heroin and other drugs for personal use.

News of the decriminalization did not make the front pages of any major Mexico City newspaper, nor was it discussed in editorials. It was slightly better publicized in the north of the country, where turf wars between rival drugs gangs have caused hundreds of killings along the Mexico-U.S. border, but was still overshadowed by news about immigration.

President Vicente Fox has yet to sign the bill, which would eliminate penalties for those caught with small amounts of some drugs, but his office has applauded it.

Mexican lawmakers have said the bill will let authorities focus on major drug traffickers and not clutter prisons with small-time offenders.

Easier to prosecute violators?
U.S. Embassy spokeswoman Judith Bryan said Saturday the measure could actually make it easier to prosecute drug crimes because it attempts to “precisely specify the amount of narcotics in possession of a suspect to allow a criminal prosecution.”

“Preliminary information from Mexican legislative sources indicates that the intent of the draft legislation is to clarify the ‘small amounts’ of drugs for personal use as stated in current Mexican law,” she said.

Mexican law already left open the possibility of dropping charges against people caught with drugs if they are considered addicts and if “the amount is the quantity necessary for personal use.” The new bill drops the “addict” requirement — automatically letting any “consumers” have drugs — and sets out specific allowable quantities.

In Mexico City’s stylish Zona Rosa neighborhood, Mexicans and tourists alike were surprised to hear it could soon be legal to carry small amounts of drugs.

Mexicans at odds over law’s impact
Drug violence “will drop because there will be less pressure on the people who consume drugs,” said Francisco Garrido, who was selling orange juice at a sidewalk stall.

But Berta Perez, an antique store owner, worried that drug sales would bring young budget travelers and spook away well-heeled tourists.

If signed by Fox, purchasing drugs “would be like buying a cigarette on the street,” she said.

Washington has long praised the Fox administration for its anti-drug efforts.

Since the president took office in December 2000, several key drug lords have been captured, including Benjamin Arellano Felix, the suspected operations chief of a Tijuana-based drug gang bearing his family’s name, and Osiel Cardenas, the accused head of the Gulf cartel, thought mainly to operate along Mexico’s border with Texas.

Yet drug addiction is growing in Mexico, especially in border cities like Tijuana.

John Morgan, a retired school psychologist visiting Mexico City from Grand Junction, Colo., said it makes sense for the country to decriminalize marijuana — but that harder drugs maybe should not be included.

“We have put people in jails for years for marijuana, something that is probably less harmful than alcohol,” he said. “But the list here is a little too global, there are several classes of drugs which are quite harmful.”
 

sanch

Electoral Member
Apr 8, 2005
647
0
16
Easier to prosecute violators?
U.S. Embassy spokeswoman Judith Bryan said Saturday the measure could actually make it easier to prosecute drug crimes because it attempts to “precisely specify the amount of narcotics in possession of a suspect to allow a criminal prosecution.”

“Preliminary information from Mexican legislative sources indicates that the intent of the draft legislation is to clarify the ‘small amounts’ of drugs for personal use as stated in current Mexican law,” she said.

Is this just an attempt by Bryan to say the US has to find some way to put a good face on this. I wonder if this "preliminary information" is going to fly in Washington.

This would be a good time for Canada to legalize small amounts for the same reason.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
The war on drugs has been an expensive failure, this is a common sence move by Mexico, it's to bad Canada will go the other way and intensify the waste of tax dollars jailing soft drug users.
 

Canucklehead

Moderator
Apr 6, 2005
797
11
18
I would be very interested to hear the reasoning for the soft touch approach from the U.S. on this one when the last time this was an issue here in Canada, we got all sorts of threatening talk from the ambassador.

Somehow I am less worried about a pothead causing trouble between fits of laughter and stuffing his/her face with munchies than I am of a cokehead coming down and getting all paranoid and schizo.

I guess we need to drop our wages, send millions of people across the border illegally and toss the environment out the window before we are treated as equals to Mexico. 8O
 

Alberta'sfinest

Electoral Member
Dec 9, 2005
217
0
16
I'd like to mention that they aren't legalizing, they're decriminalizing drugs. Instead of a criminal charge and prison, you get a fine. To put it simply, it's a cash cow. This new system has only a purpose of removing the need for a judge and allowing cops to be judge and jury, like a traffic fine. What we need here in Canada is full legalization of marijuana, and turn it into a taxable industry. The only realistic way of completely removing drugs from our society is to remove all privacy. This is dangerous to our freedoms, and would never work. The only option left is to work on harm reduction, since the harm of drugs is what we want to reduce anyways.