USA double standard on Terror

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
http://www.politicalaffairs.net/article/view/996/1/90/

Despite the Bush administration’s claim that Cuba supports terrorism, Cuba has been on the forefront of the struggle to end terrorism. The case of the Cuban Five anti-terrorist fighters is an example. The Cuban Five is a group of men who came to the United States in the early 1990s in response to the waves of terrorism directed at Cuban civilians by mercenary terrorist groups from the Cuban exile community in southern Florida. The names of the Cuban Five are Gerardo Hernández, Antonio Guerrero, Ramón Labañino, Fernando Gonzáles and René González.

This writer became more familiar with their plight through correspondences with one of these men, Antonio Guerrero. Through these letters a friendship has developed. The US government sent Guerrero to one of the harshest prisons in the country with the intention that he would be mistreated by the other prisoners. But like Nelson Mandela, he has managed to become admired by his fellow inmates and has inspired many, both within the confines of his walls and without. Antonio is a teacher within the prison and once when he was in solitary confinement, his students went on strike to protest his confinement.


(illustration by Victor Velez)

The Cuban government sent Guerrero and his comrades to the United States armed with neither malice toward the United States nor its people. Although they have not harmed anyone, they are in prison, while the anti-Cuban terrorists whom they tried to stop are free. Their sole purpose was to infiltrate the network of terrorist groups that had been attacking Cuba since the victory of the Cuban revolution. The Five were successful in infiltrating the Cuban-American groups and reporting the warnings to the Cuban government of the plans being developed to attack Cuban civilians.

The five Cubans were convicted in US federal court on June 8, 2001 in a politically charged trial. The government of the United States claimed they were engaged in espionage on US military bases and threatened “national security.” The espionage charges – and related charges – were completely without foundation. In 14,000 pages of transcript, there was no espionage evidence ever introduced. These five men are imprisoned in federal penitentiaries for simply defending their homeland from terrorist acts by Cuban-American groups within the United States. Three were sentenced to 15 years, and two received life sentences.

They were prosecuted on charges such as conspiracy to commit espionage as well as failure to register as foreign agents. This is interesting because this was the very same charges leveled at Communist Party members and was the reason why communists were imprisoned until about the mid-1980s. When the Soviet Union was still around, communists were also required to register as agents of a foreign power. Many comrades were jailed for conspiracy to commit espionage. Gus Hall, former chair of the Communist Party, USA and one-time presidential candidate, said that he was jailed for “thinking about teaching dangerous thoughts.”

Traditionally, prosecutors use a conspiracy charge in political cases. The legal definition of conspiracy is: “an agreement between people to commit a substantive crime.” Conspiracy is an undeveloped crime (such as “attempt” or “solicitation”), so making the agreement is enough to be held criminally responsible, even if the crime agreed to is not committed. By using the charge of conspiracy, the government, in essence, relieves itself of the burden of proof. Once the burden of proof is lifted, all the government has to prove to a jury is that there was an agreement to do the crime. Anyone charged with conspiracy would be convicted even if the crime were never actually committed.

In the case of the Five, the Miami jury was asked to find that there was an agreement to commit espionage. The government never had to prove that espionage actually happened. It could not have proven that espionage occurred. None of the Five sought nor possessed any top-secret information or US national defense secrets. Yet, three of the Five were convicted of entering into an agreement to commit espionage. And that is what the government sought to convince a jury drawn from Miami: “Although we can’t prove it, there certainly must have been an agreement to do it.”

The sentence for the conspiracy charge is the same as if espionage were actually committed and proven. The other defendants were convicted of conspiracy to commit espionage, despite the fact that the US government itself admitted during the trial that there was no proof whatsoever of espionage.

Ordinarily, if five people caught in the US were working for another country, they would simply be returned to their home country. This is especially true if, like the Five, they were not armed and did not inflict injury or property damage. However, in this instance three of the Five are doing life and two are doing very long prison terms. That kind of hostile treatment is reserved solely for the Cuban Revolution.

Daily we are bombarded on television with news report on the “war on terror.” We are led to believe that that this is a battle over our very souls, a battle of good versus evil. We are told: “our great nation is leading the way for the world to follow ‘democracy and freedom.’” How can we claim to laud freedom? These reports would allow ourselves to believe that we are freedom’s guardian. We need to understand that there is a double standard regarding terrorism here in the United States.

The Cuban people have been victims of terror attacks by Miami-based terrorist organizations, many of whom came from the wealthy class that left Cuba after the popular overthrow of dictator Fulgencio Batista, while others within the movement were former police thugs within the Batista regime.

Let us take a quick moment to review the history of terrorism against Cuba, which will help to put the case in perspective. In 1976 there was the bombing of a Cuban civilian plane that killed 73 innocent people, including Cuba’s entire Olympic fencing team. In 1977 there was the bombing campaign in Havana, which involved 10 bomb attacks aimed at civilians in places of international tourism. An Italian tourist was killed as were several others injured.
Do you subscribe to Political Affairs?
click image to find out how




Raul Cruz-Leon, a Salvadoran national was convicted and confessed the Cuban-American National Foundation paid him, the sum of $3,000 for each bomb he planted. Equally well known was the attempt to assassinate Cuban president Fidel Castro in an auditorium filled with university students in Panama on November 18, 2000.

These actions and hundreds of similar attacks by groups like Alpha 66, Brigada 2506, Brothers to the Rescue, Comandos F4, Cuban-American National Foundation and Omega 7, since 1959, have conducted bombings, assassinations and other sabotage and have caused the deaths and injuries to literally hundreds of innocent people. Clearly the Cuban government had no alternative but to try and stop these attacks, which was precisely the Cuban Five’s mission.

Months before the arrest of the Five, the Cuban government turned over to the FBI, a dossier summarizing evidence gathered on the Miami-based 40-year campaign of murder, bombings, arson and other attacks against Cubans. At an historic meeting in Havana, the Cubans pleaded with US law enforcement officials to act on that evidence to end the terrorism. The FBI promised it would help. Instead, in 1998, the FBI arrested the source of the information, the five Cubans, rather than going after the perpetrators or those funding terrorist activities.

Miami TV Channel 41 broadcast a show in which known paramilitaries, including Rodolfo Frometa, leader of the infamous Florida-based Comandos F4, openly spoke of their preparation for an attack on Cuba and their efforts to bring down Venezuela’s President Chávez by force. Oscar Asa, the nephew of former Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista, hosted the program. Batista was responsible for the murder of thousands of Cubans until revolutionary forces in 1959 forced him out.

This program re-aired in Cuba under the name Round Table and was hosted by Randy Alonso who requested viewers to form their own opinions after viewing the program. Alonso remarked that the message that Frometa gave was clear: “his paramilitary organization was ready and trained – it just needed the money.” Alonso continued, “The money is there – $36 million recently earmarked by the US government to support such groups.”

It is illegal in the US to defend terrorist actions on television or radio. The promotion of the assassination of another nation’s leader is also illegal under the US Neutrality Act. Nonetheless, commented round table participants, these men were able to flagrantly sit in a studio dressed in military fatigues and discuss the different armaments they were using to train paramilitaries to attack Cuba.

To make matters worse, family visits are complicated for the Five. To have to be separated from loved-ones is heart-wrenching; combine that with the isolation of being in incarcerated in a country that is not even your own. The United States government is prohibiting the wives of two of the Cuban Five entry into the United States to visit their husbands. Olga Salanueva, wife of René González, and Adriana Pérez, wife of Gerardo Hernández seek entry into the US only for family visits.

“The children are extremely anxious to see their father. They are growing up quickly without sharing enough time together. All summer long they waited to see him, and now school has started. I can’t tell you how sad they were not to visit him,” said Elisabeth Palmeiro wife of Ramón Labañino. Since Labañino’s imprisonment, the United States has granted the family permission to visit him only four times in six years. She and their children have waited almost a year to be granted a new entry visa.

René González’ six-year-old daughter Ivette has not seen her father in four years. Ivette is a US born citizen, but because her mother Olga Salanueva is denied entry, she is also unable to see her father.

The situation is continued with all four of the surviving mothers of the Cuban Five. It took one solid year before Irma Sehwerert, the mother of René González, received her visa to visit her son in September 2004. Mirta Rodríguez, mother of Antonio Guerrero, has been waiting for almost a year for the US Interests Section in Havana to grant her permission to see her son. One can only imagine the loneliness and sense of despair that can happen when one feels isolated.

For Christmas, this writer sent Antonio Guerrero an artist’s sketchpad. One of the guards obviously showed some mercy and allowed him to receive it, as they are not allowed to receive presents from the outside world. For me, that was the best Christmas present ever – it gave me more pleasure to give it and greater joy knowing how much my friend appreciated it. It taught me that the amount of money one spends on a gift does not determine its importance, for that gift only cost about five dollars. The lesson that this writer learnt from my friend is the value of giving, that it truly is more blessed to give than to receive, and for that lesson, this writer is truly grateful.

If you are wondering what you can do, you can write and show your solidarity. For the price of a 37¢ stamp you can enrich the lives of two people, yours and someone else’s. You can write to each prisoner at the addresses listed below.





People on the right here, ask themselves why people like me doesnt believe this stupid war on terror, damn you guys are naive....incredible...
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
New Plans Foresee Fighting Terrorism Beyond War Zones
By Ann Scott Tyson
The Washington Post

Sunday 23 April 2006

Pentagon to rely on special operations.

Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld has approved the military's most ambitious plan yet to fight terrorism around the world and retaliate more rapidly and decisively in the case of another major terrorist attack on the United States, according to defense officials.

The long-awaited campaign plan for the global war on terrorism, as well as two subordinate plans also approved within the past month by Rumsfeld, are considered the Pentagon's highest priority, according to officials familiar with the three documents who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak about them publicly.

Details of the plans are secret, but in general they envision a significantly expanded role for the military - and, in particular, a growing force of elite Special Operations troops - in continuous operations to combat terrorism outside of war zones such as Iraq and Afghanistan. Developed over about three years by the Special Operations Command (SOCOM) in Tampa, the plans reflect a beefing up of the Pentagon's involvement in domains traditionally handled by the Central Intelligence Agency and the State Department.

For example, SOCOM has dispatched small teams of Army Green Berets and other Special Operations troops to U.S. embassies in about 20 countries in the Middle East, Asia, Africa and Latin America, where they do operational planning and intelligence gathering to enhance the ability to conduct military operations where the United States is not at war.

And in a subtle but important shift contained in a classified order last year, the Pentagon gained the leeway to inform - rather than gain the approval of - the U.S. ambassador before conducting military operations in a foreign country, according to several administration officials. "We do not need ambassador-level approval," said one defense official familiar with the order.

Overall, the plans underscore Rumsfeld's conviction since the September 2001 terrorist attacks that the U.S. military must expand its mission beyond 20th-century conventional warfare by infantry, tanks, ships and fighter jets to fighting non-state groups that are, above all, difficult to find.

The plans each run more than 100 pages and cover a wide range of overt and clandestine military activities - such as man-hunting and intelligence gathering on terrorist networks; attacks on terrorist training camps and recruiting efforts; and partnering with foreign militaries to eliminate terrorist sanctuaries. Together, they amount to an assignment of responsibilities to different military commands to conduct what the Pentagon envisions as a "long war" against terrorism.

The main campaign plan sets priorities, allocates resources such as manpower and funding, and coordinates operations among regional military commands to implement the Pentagon's broader National Military Strategic Plan for the War on Terrorism, published in unclassified form in February. It lays out nine key goals, such as targeting terrorist leaders, safe havens, communications and other logistical support, and countering extremist ideology.

A second detailed plan is focused specifically on al-Qaeda and associated movements, including more than a dozen groups spread across the Middle East, Central Asia, Southeast Asia and Africa. Such groups include the Egyptian Islamic Jihad and Ansar al-Islam in the Middle East, Jemaah Islamiya in Indonesia, and the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat in Saharan Africa.

A third plan sets out how the military can both disrupt and respond to another major terrorist strike on the United States. It includes lengthy annexes that offer a menu of options for the military to retaliate quickly against specific terrorist groups, individuals or state sponsors depending on who is believed to be behind an attack. Another attack could create both a justification and an opportunity that is lacking today to retaliate against some known targets, according to current and former defense officials familiar with the plan.

This plan details "what terrorists or bad guys we would hit if the gloves came off. The gloves are not off," said one official, who asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the subject.

The Pentagon declined to comment on the counterterrorism plans or their approval, citing longstanding policy. "We do not discuss contingency plans or future operations," said Cmdr. Greg Hicks, a Defense Department spokesman. SOCOM's deputy commander, Vice Adm. Eric T. Olson, said earlier this month in Senate testimony that the plans had been approved.

Special Operations Command, led by Gen. Doug Brown, has been building up its headquarters and writing the plans since 2003, when Rumsfeld first designated it as the lead command for the war on terrorism. Its budget has grown 60 percent since 2003 to $8 billion in fiscal 2007. President Bush empowered the 53,000-strong command with coordinating the entire military's efforts in counterterrorism in 2004.

"SOCOM is, in fact, in charge of the global war on terror," Brown said in testimony before the House last month. In this role, SOCOM directs and coordinates actions by the military's regional combatant commands. SOCOM, if directed, can also command its own counterterrorist operations - such as when a threat spans regional boundaries or the mission is highly sensitive - but it has not done so yet, according to Olson, and other officials say that is likely to be the exception to the rule.

To extend its reach to more countries, SOCOM is increasing by 13,000 the number of Special Operations troops, including Special Forces soldiers skilled in language and working with indigenous militaries, and Delta Force operatives and Navy SEAL teams that form clandestine "special mission units" engaged in reconnaissance, intelligence gathering and man-hunting. Already, SOCOM is seeing its biggest deployments in history, with 7,000 troops overseas today, but the majority have been concentrated in Iraq and Afghanistan, with 85 percent last year in the Middle East, Central Asia or the Horn of Africa.

But SOCOM's more robust role - while adding manpower, specialized skills and organization to the fight against terrorism - has also led to some bureaucratic tensions, both inside the military with the joint staff and regional commands, as well as with the CIA and State Department. Such tensions are one reason SOCOM's plan took years.

When SOCOM first dispatched military liaison teams abroad starting in 2003, they were called "Operational Control Elements," a term changed last year because "it raised the hackles of regional commanders and ambassadors. It was a bad choice of language," said one defense official, adding: "Who can pick on Military Liaison Elements?"

State Department officials, meanwhile, said that although, for the most part, cooperation with the military teams has been good, they remain concerned over continued "gray areas" regarding their status. "Special Ops wants the flexibility and speed to go in there. . . . but there's understandably questions of how you do that and how you have clear lines of authority," one U.S. official said. There remains "continuing discussion, to put it politely, in terms of how this is going to work," the official said. SOCOM says the teams work for the regional commanders.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These personell are terrorist American Terrorists who conduct exactly the kind of dirty deadly operations against civilians the we have been told American would never do. Every American embassy harbours teams of professional murderers like these all over the world.
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
aeon said:
People on the right here, ask themselves why people like me doesnt believe this stupid war on terror, damn you guys are naive....incredible...

You by no means represent the left, if that's what you are alluding to, but rather paranoia.
 

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
I have to agree with Cuba.

How does America condem some forms of terrorism, but over the years have allowed terrorist attacks by mercenary forces that have killed innocent Cubans?

For example that guy who blew up that plane and they wanted him extradited to Venezuela, he was a terrorist and they supported him.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
I think not said:
aeon said:
People on the right here, ask themselves why people like me doesnt believe this stupid war on terror, damn you guys are naive....incredible...

You by no means represent the left, if that's what you are alluding to, but rather paranoia.

And you ITN represent, promote and embrace State Terrorism.
 

sanch

Electoral Member
Apr 8, 2005
647
0
16
The number one priority of the war on terror is to make the world secure for the US and its allies. As Cuba is not an ally the US probably does not see protecting Cuba from terrorists as a major priority. Further since Cuba is not an ally having its agents enter the US clandestinely would be seen as a threat to the US and so the agents were arrested. And as the article DB posted suggests if a plot is uncovered that threatens US security then the people responsible will be taken out in some fashion. Conversely if a passenger plane is hijacked and heading for New York or Washington it will be shot down. If you examine all the facts and actions since 9/11 you will see they are very consistent with the above priorities. That is the war on terror.

The two of you seem to believe the US is the bad guy and the guys plotting against it are the good guys. The article says that security personal will be stationed abroad at embassies to do research and track terrorists and stop actions against the US they discover. These kinds of individuals are also stationed at US and Canadian airports. In DB’s language the surveillance teams are transformed into murderers and those they are tracking are simply citizens.

In light of all of the above are the two of you not afraid that for exposing this massive ruse you will not be tracked? Your very enlightenment might make you a threat. Perhaps that is why the rest of us feign stupidity. I’m just interested in the sort of precautions you might have made to avoid detection. I'm being serious here for if I believed what the two of you believe about how the world operates I would be very frightened. That would only be normal.
 

Curiosity

Senate Member
Jul 30, 2005
7,326
138
63
California
Sanch

I can't resist and I should because you are being serious. But what the heck.

I thought "tinfoil helmets" were effective. Not so? :wink:
 

Johnny Utah

Council Member
Mar 11, 2006
1,434
1
38
Wednesday's Child said:
Sanch

I can't resist and I should because you are being serious. But what the heck.

I thought "tinfoil helmets" were effective. Not so? :wink:

A few members of this Forum are wearing their Tin Foil Hats right now. :wink:
 

Sassylassie

House Member
Jan 31, 2006
2,976
7
38
Sanch, I always enjoy reading level headed posts. Thanks for the above posting it mirrors my thoughts.

P.S. For those who believeTin Foil will protect you here are few hints: The true purpose of Tin Foil is to be used in food preparation, not on your head--unless you are having high-lights.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
RE: USA double standard o

Thee blind mice see how they run, from thread to thread sticking there little fingers into the imperial holes desperate to hide the truth from anyone who would examine the realitys of the world. Just dreamers they already live in the past and some don't even know it, see how frightened they are that the real world is destroying the illusion they live in. I love George Bush, a good worker for the left, friend of the working man, and the dummys picked him for us. hahahahaha
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Jersay said:
I have to agree with Cuba.

How does America condem some forms of terrorism, but over the years have allowed terrorist attacks by mercenary forces that have killed innocent Cubans?

For example that guy who blew up that plane and they wanted him extradited to Venezuela, he was a terrorist and they supported him.


That guy??

Luis Posada Carriles is a 77-year-old former CIA operative who was trained by the U.S. Army at Fort Benning in Georgia. He has been trying to violently overthrow Fidel Castro's government for four decades. Three weeks ago he entered the United States after years of hiding in Central America and the Caribbean.

Posada has been connected to the 1976 downing of a civilian airliner that killed 73 passengers - the first act of airline terrorism in the Western hemisphere. He has also been linked to a series of 1997 bombings of hotels, restaurants, and discotheques in Havana that killed an Italian tourist; as well as a plot to assassinate Castro five years ago. He has been jailed in Venezuela and Panama. He was last seen in Honduras. Earlier this month he was said to have slipped into Miami. His newly-retained attorney has now requested asylum for him. In response, Venezuela's Supreme Court ruled that the government should seek his extradition from the United States to face terrorism charges.


http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/09/148243



So much for the war on terror, incredible.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
I think not said:
Glad we could be of service.

JEB BUSH FOR PRESIDENT


Lol , jeb bush for president, bush 41, bush 43, and bush 44, did the united states, take their inspiration in saudi arabia dictators ship?