Should George Bush be charged for commiting war crimes?

[JonB2004]

Should George Bush be charged for commiting war crimes?

George Bush went to Iraq for no reason but oil. About 2300 U.S. soldiers and about 250,000 Iraqis have died in this war. George Bush invaded Iraq because he believed that they posessed weapons of mass destruction. The UN went to Iraq to investigate these claims and found nothing. The U.S defied the UN orders not to invade Iraq. For that George Bush should be charged for commiting war crimes.

 

[Jay]

Good luck with that.

 

[JonB2004]

RE: Should George Bush be

Why do you say that?

 

[Jay]

Because your going to need it.

 

[JonB2004]

RE: Should George Bush be

Say something meaningful or buzz off.

 

[Jay]

The U.S defied the UN orders not to invade Iraq. For that George Bush should be charged for commiting war crimes.

How many countries went in to Iraq?

 

[JonB2004]

RE: Should George Bush be

I know alot of countries went to Iraq. But you know how the U.S. is. If you don't do what they say, they get pissed off at you. And nobody wants to get on the bad side of the U.S.

 

[Jay]

Is this the strong argument to be used against them in some War Crimes Tribunal?

".... clearly all the other nations we coerced into taking out Saddam, I mean who wants to get on Americas bad side?"


I say good luck.

 

[Johnny Utah]

Funny how you didn't ask if Saddam should have been charged with War Crimes from the First Gulf War in 1991. :roll:

Another Anti-Bush Thread *Yawn*

 

[darkbeaver]

RE: Should George Bush be

Saddam is being charged with war crimes and others, right now JohnnyUtah, the problem is thats it not being done at the world court, but in a cocked up American puppet court.
There is no question that bush and the others who started this war on false reasons should be charged, however like Jay said, good luck trying to touch any of them, they run and own the world, but not for much longer, maybe the Chinese will bring them to justice.

 

[BitWhys]

The U.S defied the UN orders not to invade Iraq. For that George Bush should be charged for commiting war crimes.

How many countries went in to Iraq?

as many as they could buy. plus Britain but I'm starting to think that was a puppy love thing. oh yeah. and Japan, but they just wanted to take the jeep out for a test drive.

 

[BitWhys]

geez

you'd think Britain would be on that autolink thing.

I'd be happy, and surprised, if Bush got as much a ticket for being a moron.

 

[I think not]

Should George Bush be charged for commiting war crimes?

Of course he should, list the war crimes one by one and let's analyze each of them.

 

[Jo Canadian]

 

[Jay]

Should George Bush be charged for commiting war crimes?

Of course he should, list the war crimes one by one and let's analyze each of them.

The thread won't go that far.

 

[I think not]

Why? It's a question with common sense. I want to see the list of war crimes he will be charged with. Chop chop.

 

[JonB2004]

RE: Should George Bush be

The death of about 2300 U.S. soldiers and about 250,000 Iraqis. And refusing the UN's order not to invade Iraq.

 

[Johnny Utah]

Re: RE: Should George Bush be

The death of about 2300 U.S. soldiers and about 250,000 Iraqis. And refusing the UN's order not to invade Iraq.

While we are at it let's charge Clinton for starting the Kosovo War without the UN's permission. :roll:

 

[JonB2004]

RE: Should George Bush be

Sure, why not?

 

[Johnny Utah]

Re: RE: Should George Bush be

Sure, why not?

Thought you would say that, keep sucking that useless UN Tit. :roll: