Fear is once again being used to win elections and support for
"pre-emptive" military strikes , this time in Israel.
The Likuc party is warning voters that Iran might just blow them all up, since Iran now has an almost-working nuclear reactor. Its a tentative connection at best, its somewhere down the roa not soon, its likely never going to happen.
Not going to happen that is, unless Israel goes ahead and does a pre-emptive strike on non-existant weapons facilities.
Pre-emptive - before the threat materialises, before we know for sure, just in case.
Not "going to war regrettably", as the last option,, after damage has been done, after thousands killed and no end in sight, when the justification is real. No, just do it anyways, just in case.Start a nuclear war between whatever two sides materialise after it gets started....
Its dumb, and its obviously the same group that got the USA "a;; the way to Baghdad" - BushCo, Israelis loyal to BushCo [or, the Israelis who tell Bush what to do?] , and all their Elite Corporatist types who benefit from any war, just like they did in WW2. And every war. Same group.
Actual threat, or just percieved threat, it is good enough as long as it gets civilians afraid enough that they support military intervention.
An excuse to go to war - does this sound familiar?
Links:
"Recent reports suggest that the U.S. may be preparing its allies for an imminent military strike against facilities of Iran's suspected clandestine nuclear weapons program." -
http://tinyurl.com/ddkc9
"Likud members: Bomb Iran"
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3193102,00.html
"pre-emptive" military strikes , this time in Israel.
The Likuc party is warning voters that Iran might just blow them all up, since Iran now has an almost-working nuclear reactor. Its a tentative connection at best, its somewhere down the roa not soon, its likely never going to happen.
Not going to happen that is, unless Israel goes ahead and does a pre-emptive strike on non-existant weapons facilities.
Pre-emptive - before the threat materialises, before we know for sure, just in case.
Not "going to war regrettably", as the last option,, after damage has been done, after thousands killed and no end in sight, when the justification is real. No, just do it anyways, just in case.Start a nuclear war between whatever two sides materialise after it gets started....
Its dumb, and its obviously the same group that got the USA "a;; the way to Baghdad" - BushCo, Israelis loyal to BushCo [or, the Israelis who tell Bush what to do?] , and all their Elite Corporatist types who benefit from any war, just like they did in WW2. And every war. Same group.
Actual threat, or just percieved threat, it is good enough as long as it gets civilians afraid enough that they support military intervention.
An excuse to go to war - does this sound familiar?
Links:
"Recent reports suggest that the U.S. may be preparing its allies for an imminent military strike against facilities of Iran's suspected clandestine nuclear weapons program." -
http://tinyurl.com/ddkc9
"Likud members: Bomb Iran"
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3193102,00.html