http://www.wanttoknow.info/050908insidejob911
Each of these prominent leaders now claims that there are serious problems with the official government story of 9/11.
The mainstream media has sadly failed to give significant coverage to the serious questions being raised these public figures.
"If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling," said Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D, a former member of the Bush team.
http://www.wanttoknow.info/050620officialstory911bogus
- Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is "bogus" and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7." Morgan Reynolds is the former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term (6/13/05)
http://www.wanttoknow.info/911pakistanconnection
- Britain's Former Minister of Environment With Key Information on 9/11 - a witness who translated some messages about 9-11 events before the WTC towers were hit.
Witness Sibel Edmonds, a 33-year-old former FBI translator of intelligence is now under two gagging orders that forbid her from testifying in court or mentioning the names of the people or the countries involved.
She has been quoted as saying: "My translations of the 9/11 intercepts included [terrorist] money laundering, detailed and date-specific information ... if they were to do real investigations, we would see several significant high-level criminal prosecutions in this country [the US] ... and believe me, they will do everything to cover this up".
http://www.wanttoknow.info/911kevinrryanfired
Lab Director Fired for Questioning Official 9/11 Story
He tells about the actual collapse of the WTC towers, lab analysis shows the steel didn't "melt", collapse was from an explosion...that went off separately from the jetliner's explosion when they hit the WTC.
http://www.wanttoknow.info/9-11cover-up10pg
and finally, the collection of cover ups over 9-11 from this same source. There will probably be some overlap with the evidence here.
So, what does it all mean? The offical story was not true, so what?
It means 9-11 might have been all about getting support for America going to war.
Create an incident, say it was "them"...
... also BushCo used the false Iraqi WMD threat for support, so "digging up support for going to war" is not beyond his ways and means. Not the desperately urgent and dangerous situation that calls for war, that calls for us to let our sons die there, that allows the USA to justify killing over 100,000 innocent civilians in Iraq... No, that stuff needs real reasons, no something dug up or created.
This is the highest form of crime ever, due to the sheer numbers of horrible deaths.
Your blood should be boiling - please check to see if you are alive ok? If you are alive and your eyes are open, you will be boiling mad if 9-11 was a farce... and yet you are not - what don't you believe?
Pearl Harbour the same tactic? The history taught to us in school was propaganda? - Are you still not angry? What, are you so dim as to not care when they f*ck you over like that?
Each of these prominent leaders now claims that there are serious problems with the official government story of 9/11.
The mainstream media has sadly failed to give significant coverage to the serious questions being raised these public figures.
"If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling," said Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D, a former member of the Bush team.
http://www.wanttoknow.info/050620officialstory911bogus
- Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is "bogus" and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7." Morgan Reynolds is the former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term (6/13/05)
http://www.wanttoknow.info/911pakistanconnection
- Britain's Former Minister of Environment With Key Information on 9/11 - a witness who translated some messages about 9-11 events before the WTC towers were hit.
Witness Sibel Edmonds, a 33-year-old former FBI translator of intelligence is now under two gagging orders that forbid her from testifying in court or mentioning the names of the people or the countries involved.
She has been quoted as saying: "My translations of the 9/11 intercepts included [terrorist] money laundering, detailed and date-specific information ... if they were to do real investigations, we would see several significant high-level criminal prosecutions in this country [the US] ... and believe me, they will do everything to cover this up".
http://www.wanttoknow.info/911kevinrryanfired
Lab Director Fired for Questioning Official 9/11 Story
He tells about the actual collapse of the WTC towers, lab analysis shows the steel didn't "melt", collapse was from an explosion...that went off separately from the jetliner's explosion when they hit the WTC.
http://www.wanttoknow.info/9-11cover-up10pg
and finally, the collection of cover ups over 9-11 from this same source. There will probably be some overlap with the evidence here.
So, what does it all mean? The offical story was not true, so what?
It means 9-11 might have been all about getting support for America going to war.
Create an incident, say it was "them"...
... also BushCo used the false Iraqi WMD threat for support, so "digging up support for going to war" is not beyond his ways and means. Not the desperately urgent and dangerous situation that calls for war, that calls for us to let our sons die there, that allows the USA to justify killing over 100,000 innocent civilians in Iraq... No, that stuff needs real reasons, no something dug up or created.
This is the highest form of crime ever, due to the sheer numbers of horrible deaths.
Your blood should be boiling - please check to see if you are alive ok? If you are alive and your eyes are open, you will be boiling mad if 9-11 was a farce... and yet you are not - what don't you believe?
Pearl Harbour the same tactic? The history taught to us in school was propaganda? - Are you still not angry? What, are you so dim as to not care when they f*ck you over like that?