The Truth of the Matter

Haggis McBagpipe

Walks on Forum Water
Jun 11, 2004
5,085
7
38
Victoria, B.C.
[/img]
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,362
60
48
Or in another area...the LIES of the matter

Here is how I know that the elections were rigged, the support for the Bush administration has never been large and that the media portrays a false reality to the people of this nation. I have attended several huge demonstrations against the Bush administration in DC & NY. The first one I had attended in DC had several hundred thousand people there. The one in NY must have had a million people or so because there were 3 avenues filled with people for 50 block each. Yesterday’s rally in DC had several hundred thousand people. I know this because I have attended NFL football games where 60 or so thousand people have attended and the crowds at those events did not come close to the crowds I have witnessed. Yet each event was represented by our corporate media so inaccurately that you can taste the deception. Each time the major news organizations have understated the crowd numbers by as much as 90% and if they show pictures of the events they use pictures taken early during the crowd build up, not during the peak hours where you can not find a place to stand because of the huge numbers of attendees.

So I ask you, if the media time and time again lie about the opposition to this administration and understate the global and domestic opposition to them why would I trust them when they tell me that there is domestic support for anything this administration does? Why should I believe their polls? Why should I believe anything they say after I have witnessed their continued blatant lies about the level of opposition to this administration that I have witnessed with my own eyes! The answer is I should not trust them and neither should you. The media is the enemy of the American people and our Democracy. Think about it! – Jesse, Editor, TvNewsLIES.org
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,362
60
48
IS it possible???.......

It’s Happening Now

by Karen Kwiatkowski
by Karen Kwiatkowski


The realist foreign policy events in Washington, local political movements around the country opposing the ongoing American occupation of Iraq, and Jon Stewart’s immense popularity among the under-40 crowd America are all important.

They do their part to help us, as a people, come to grips with the lies repeatedly spoken by our dear leaders. They shed light on the American tax-and-debt–funded exploration of the farthest frontiers of greed. They articulate the national shame that we are beginning to feel about the tyrannous acts we have committed at home and abroad in the name of "freedom" and "democracy."

The power of popular domestic outrage at a behemoth state shouldn’t be underestimated. In this country, it provides fertile ground for what soldiers and Marines back from Iraq and Afghanistan are telling us – the ugly truth that our President and his supportive Congress and corrupted judiciary can never say and will never admit.

Domestic outrage and honesty from the battle lines are creating a binary weapon powerful enough to bring down whole governments. At a minimum, it isolates our political parasites and deprives them of political energy, mobility and security.

The explosion of the Abu Ghraib prison scandal of last year could not be contained by the elite-serving government regime, even as the Pentagon followed its established procedure to condemn publicly an isolated act of a few bad apples, punish the low ranking, and change the subject.

A sense of duty and ethics is still present in our all-volunteer military, despite crass anti-republican inducements of travel, adventure, education and cash. A real sense of human compassion and a practiced ability to distinguish between good and evil persists in the modern American military, at least at the soldier level. We may find solace in knowing that a soldier’s compassion and morality is neither dependent upon nor subordinate to the latest cheerleading chant from the presidential bullhorn.

Take for example, the New York Times’ Saturday report on the travails of the 82nd Airborne’s Captain Ian Fishbeck. Fishbeck and several NCOs in his unit tried for months to get honest and rock-solid guidance on the legal and correct treatment of Iraqis – prisoners, detainees, and in general. The DoD leadership chain, as it so often does when faced with a hard decision, a moral quandary, or the possibility of bucking the wishes and intents of its political masters, demurred. Fishbeck persisted for 17 months, and after 17 months of systemic stonewalling, called Human Rights Watch and the U.S. Congress directly with his questions and concerns.

Consider the writings and speeches of retired Lt Col Robert Bowman and Hart Viges, another former member of the 82nd Airborne. Recall the public trials and tribulations of active duty NCOs who have spoken the truth about the invasion and occupation of Iraq, and Afghanistan too.

We still won’t see this level of honesty in all the major national papers, but we no longer have to rely solely on the independent or international news for the truth. Talk to the reservists and guardsmen and active soldiers and marines who have returned home from Iraq and Afghanistan, on leave and between tours. Hear their words across your kitchen table and your local bar, listen to their pillow talk and their advice to their children, nieces and nephews.

The soldiers’ words advise us not to believe the senior spokesmen at the Pentagon because these spokesmen have been lying for a good long time. The soldiers’ words do not echo, and in fact contradict, the foot-stomping and fist-raising rhetoric of the neoconservative voices in the White House and Congress and at the American Enterprise Institute. The soldiers’ words warn their younger friends and relatives to stay far away from the deadly and immoral grip of federal service in uniform.

Most of these military men and women have no political agenda – although congressional campaigns by Paul Hackett in Ohio, Patrick Murphy in Pennsylvania, David Ashe in Virginian, and Tim Dunn in North Carolina have been launched on the wings of the truth about Iraq as seen by a soldier who was there. Three of these four campaigners are military lawyers, and only one has featured a truly antiwar message. But all four candidates have emerged as fiscally conservative, morally sound, Republic-cherishing Democrats.

Given the presumed political nature of the military today as traditionally conservative – and yet contradictorily historically very supportive of George W. Bush – perhaps we are seeing an early psychological breakthrough in the treatment of the two faces of the Republican Party.

As with Eve, recognition of the "other" personality must come first, and only then can conservatives choose which personality to accept, and which to destroy. A Chinese proverb says, "The beginning of wisdom lies in calling things by their right name." Perhaps it follows that the beginning of ethics is choosing to live consistently with revealed wisdom.

In any case, it’s happening. In my all-Republican county of Shenandoah, it is doubtful many of my neighbors drove the 90 minutes into DC this weekend to express antiwar sentiment. But at the local gas station, two local men were overheard this weekend discussing the most recent price hike. One said, shaking his head, "That damn George Bush." The other local man nodded with "He has to go."

A few weeks ago, I spoke at an event sponsored by the Libertarians at Virginia Tech. It wasn’t overly amusing to examine our ongoing Iraq policy, but the audience nodded and chuckled when I noted how successful the administration and congressional agenda had been in the Middle East so far. Washington has gained a dozen brand-new U.S. military bases in Southwest Asia, we got Iraq, the oil companies are reporting record-setting profits, and not a single neoconservative has been harmed.

The well-dressed and coiffed elite decision makers see Iraq as just one successful part of a larger international agenda – an agenda naturally paid for in taxes, inflation, home-grown fascism and the blood of less-than-elite Americans and desperate would-be citizens. Still thriving politically in Washington, these neo-Jacobin imperialists may not fully sense the sea change.

But just about everyone else does.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,362
60
48
Another interesting...truth..and part of the whole dynamic

September 27, 2005

With God on Our Side - George W. Bush and the Rise of the Religious Right in America (DVD)

If you want to know the history and the strategy by which the Evangelicals came to power in the George W. Bush administration, then you must see this insightful documentary. Beginning with the golden age of a young, charismatic Billy Graham in the '50s, the film follows the growth of the Evangelical/fundamentalist political movement up to and through the George W. Bush presidency.

What is even more remarkable -- and we have viewed the film twice -- is that the primary resources for the documentary are the "A" list of Evangelical/Fundamentalist television celebrities (including Falwell, Robison, LaHaye, Robertson, etc.) who speak openly about the political strategy that the religious extremists adopted to finally seize power in 2000 (remember that Bush lost the popular vote by 520,000, but these guys think that God willed his victory.) Except for the wimpy Howard Fineman of Newsweek (who actually manages to offer up some insightful thoughts for once), all the interviewees are Bush supporters. But what makes them fascinating is that they discuss the process by which the Evangelical vote became so strong.

Falwell and Ralph Reed are amazingly forthright about how they strategically went about merging Christian fundamentalism with the political process. And their success is due to their diligence in pursuing a disciplined and coordinated plan of action. What might seem surprising to many BuzzFlash readers is that the Evangelical/Fundamentalist movement grew disenchanted with Reagan rather quickly, because his staff was filled with political operatives who gave religion short shrift when it came to action -- and the Christian faithful practically loathed George Herbert Walker Bush.

It took the parallel growth of an Evangelical/Fundamentalist political infrastructure and the emergence of willing "faith" candidate partners like DeLay and George W. Bush to push the movement that started back in the '50s over the top. It is clear from the documentary that these people believe that the United States government is one anointed by a Christian God who speaks through a literal interpretation of the Bible, and that the world is divided into good and evil. It took a simpleton like George W. Bush to hoodwink a nation into thinking life and international affairs were that simple, although the television preachers, obviously, see it differently.

Another remarkable observation about this film is that supporters of Bush and Fundamentalism would not probably object to anything in the documentary. They say what they mean; and they mean what they say. The producers don't take sides. They let the story be told by the self-anointed men of faith who took over the American government in the name of a Christian God as they see him. And they are quite open about how they did it (except for the major point that Bush was selected by the Supreme Court in 2000, not the American people.)

Perhaps the most important message for Democrats and Independents in this documentary is that the conventional wisdom that America is a nation of people who reflect a "right center" political outlook is disproved by the fact that in 1964, Goldwater ran pretty much on the same platform Bush ran on in 2000 and was trounced. It's just that the Evangelicals never gave up and were so tenacious that they pushed media coverage -- as well as legislation and politicians -- through think tanks and voting drives to accept their way of thinking as conventional wisdom. Oddly enough, they do prove that the power of "faith" can change reality, whereas Democratic leaders accept the outlook of the fundamentalists as unalterable public opinion. What the Democratic leaders lack is what the Evangelical/Fundamentalists have: passion, conviction and tenacity --- even it is entirely misdirected and destructive to our Constitutional democracy.

The Evangelical/Christians have the conviction of their faith. You can hand them that. It may bring America to its knees and precipitate their beloved Armageddon, but they are fighting for something they believe in. The Democratic leaders lack the passion of conviction to save democracy from them.

This documentary first appeared on PBS and is just being released on DVD in the United States.
 

mrmom2

Senate Member
Mar 8, 2005
5,380
6
38
Kamloops BC
There can be little pretense anymore that the Democrats and Republicans are anything more than faithful factions of a single party, dedicated to the interests of the fossil fuel and arms contractor lobbies and to the establishment of the U.S. as a global empire.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,362
60
48
this new and expanded edition of Michel Chossudovsky's 2002 best seller, the author blows away the smokescreen put up by the mainstream media, that 9/11 was an attack on America by "Islamic terrorists". Through meticulous research, the author uncovers a military-intelligence ploy behind the September 11 attacks, and the cover-up and complicity of key members of the Bush Administration.

The expanded edition, which includes twelve new chapters focuses on the use of 9/11 as a pretext for the invasion and illegal occupation of Iraq, the militarisation of justice and law enforcement and the repeal of democracy.

According to Chossudovsky, the "war on terrorism" is a complete fabrication based on the illusion that one man, Osama bin Laden, outwitted the $40 billion-a-year American intelligence apparatus. The "war on terrorism" is a war of conquest. Globalisation is the final march to the "New World Order", dominated by Wall Street and the U.S. military-industrial complex.

September 11, 2001 provides a justification for waging a war without borders. Washington's agenda consists in extending the frontiers of the American Empire to facilitate complete U.S. corporate control, while installing within America the institutions of the Homeland Security State.





Chossudovsky peels back layers of rhetoric to reveal a complex web of deceit aimed at luring the American people and the rest of the world into accepting a military solution which threatens the future of humanity.

"Millions of people have been misled regarding the causes and consequences of September 11.

When people across the US and around the World find out that Al Qaeda is not an outside enemy but a creation of US foreign policy and the CIA, the legitimacy of the bipartisan war agenda will tumble like a deck of cards." (Michel Chossudovsky, first edition, 2002)

Across the land, the image of an "outside enemy" is instilled in the consciousness of Americans. Al Qaeda is threatening America and the world. The repeal of democracy under the Patriot legislation is portrayed as a means to providing "domestic security" and upholding civil liberties.

The 9/11 Commission Report destroys the historical record of US covert support to international terrorism, while creating the illusion that America and "Western Civilization" are threatened. In turn, the various terrorist warnings and code orange alerts have created, across America, an atmosphere of fear and intimidation.


not good. :evil: