You were lied to - are you going to do something about it?


moghrabi
Avatar
#1
....

When Bush has the corporate controlled media aka the LIARS FOR HIRE in his pocket that NEVER hold him accountable, why bother? They have simply repeated white house lies for years and even now refuse to call Bush on his lies. A large section of misinformed Americans still believe that Saddam had these weapons, due to the constant barrage of lies that the masses have been force fed for years by the corporate media, and some are still gullible enough to believe that Iraq had something to do with 911.

.....

--
 
moghrabi
Avatar
#2
....

When Bush has the corporate controlled media aka the LIARS FOR HIRE in his pocket that NEVER hold him accountable, why bother? They have simply repeated white house lies for years and even now refuse to call Bush on his lies. A large section of misinformed Americans still believe that Saddam had these weapons, due to the constant barrage of lies that the masses have been force fed for years by the corporate media, and some are still gullible enough to believe that Iraq had something to do with 911.

.....

--
 
moghrabi
Avatar
#3
....

When Bush has the corporate controlled media aka the LIARS FOR HIRE in his pocket that NEVER hold him accountable, why bother? They have simply repeated white house lies for years and even now refuse to call Bush on his lies. A large section of misinformed Americans still believe that Saddam had these weapons, due to the constant barrage of lies that the masses have been force fed for years by the corporate media, and some are still gullible enough to believe that Iraq had something to do with 911.

.....

--
 
Mooseskin Johnny
#4
Somewhere I was reading that big media corporations have reduced the number of investigative reporters. They cost too much. So, what you hear, see, or read has a high component of repetition. These guys are too busy to do the necessary work.
 
Mooseskin Johnny
#5
Somewhere I was reading that big media corporations have reduced the number of investigative reporters. They cost too much. So, what you hear, see, or read has a high component of repetition. These guys are too busy to do the necessary work.
 
Mooseskin Johnny
#6
Somewhere I was reading that big media corporations have reduced the number of investigative reporters. They cost too much. So, what you hear, see, or read has a high component of repetition. These guys are too busy to do the necessary work.
 
no1important
#7
At least here I belive anyways we get a more balanced view from the media.

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 but people follow "W" blindly no matter what he says.

If it was up to me I would arrest him once he left American soil provided he not on an official state visit and send him to the Hague to be tried as a War Criminal.

Luckily for him the World Court does not practice "Texas Style of justice" so Bush could rot in a cell until he dies.
 
no1important
#8
At least here I belive anyways we get a more balanced view from the media.

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 but people follow "W" blindly no matter what he says.

If it was up to me I would arrest him once he left American soil provided he not on an official state visit and send him to the Hague to be tried as a War Criminal.

Luckily for him the World Court does not practice "Texas Style of justice" so Bush could rot in a cell until he dies.
 
no1important
#9
At least here I belive anyways we get a more balanced view from the media.

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 but people follow "W" blindly no matter what he says.

If it was up to me I would arrest him once he left American soil provided he not on an official state visit and send him to the Hague to be tried as a War Criminal.

Luckily for him the World Court does not practice "Texas Style of justice" so Bush could rot in a cell until he dies.
 
Twila
Avatar
#10
If we could prove he was a danger to the Canadian People, we would be able to implement a "pre-emptive" strike against him. Get us some "smart bombs" and some "guided missiles" and take him out. After all, he did lay the ground work for this sort of activity.

j/k...... sort of.
 
Twila
Avatar
#11
If we could prove he was a danger to the Canadian People, we would be able to implement a "pre-emptive" strike against him. Get us some "smart bombs" and some "guided missiles" and take him out. After all, he did lay the ground work for this sort of activity.

j/k...... sort of.
 
Twila
Avatar
#12
If we could prove he was a danger to the Canadian People, we would be able to implement a "pre-emptive" strike against him. Get us some "smart bombs" and some "guided missiles" and take him out. After all, he did lay the ground work for this sort of activity.

j/k...... sort of.
 
moghrabi
Avatar
#13
Well, he does have WMD, he is a bully, he is a danger to his neighbors, he is not abiding by the UN, he tortures people, he killed innocent people and so on. These are the same reasons he gave to invade Iraq. Now we have the same reasons to invade his country, arrest him and get rid of this pest once and for all.
 
moghrabi
Avatar
#14
Well, he does have WMD, he is a bully, he is a danger to his neighbors, he is not abiding by the UN, he tortures people, he killed innocent people and so on. These are the same reasons he gave to invade Iraq. Now we have the same reasons to invade his country, arrest him and get rid of this pest once and for all.
 
moghrabi
Avatar
#15
Well, he does have WMD, he is a bully, he is a danger to his neighbors, he is not abiding by the UN, he tortures people, he killed innocent people and so on. These are the same reasons he gave to invade Iraq. Now we have the same reasons to invade his country, arrest him and get rid of this pest once and for all.
 
Paco
#16
Quote: Originally Posted by moghrabi

Well, he does have WMD, he is a bully, he is a danger to his neighbors, he is not abiding by the UN, he tortures people, he killed innocent people and so on. These are the same reasons he gave to invade Iraq. Now we have the same reasons to invade his country, arrest him and get rid of this pest once and for all.

You are promoting an act of aggression. You have spoke out against Bush’s war on terror, yet now you endorse the same tactics that you have previously condemned.

Welcome to the human race, hypocrite.

By the way… bring it.
 
Paco
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by moghrabi

Well, he does have WMD, he is a bully, he is a danger to his neighbors, he is not abiding by the UN, he tortures people, he killed innocent people and so on. These are the same reasons he gave to invade Iraq. Now we have the same reasons to invade his country, arrest him and get rid of this pest once and for all.

You are promoting an act of aggression. You have spoke out against Bush’s war on terror, yet now you endorse the same tactics that you have previously condemned.

Welcome to the human race, hypocrite.

By the way… bring it.
 
Paco
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by moghrabi

Well, he does have WMD, he is a bully, he is a danger to his neighbors, he is not abiding by the UN, he tortures people, he killed innocent people and so on. These are the same reasons he gave to invade Iraq. Now we have the same reasons to invade his country, arrest him and get rid of this pest once and for all.

You are promoting an act of aggression. You have spoke out against Bush’s war on terror, yet now you endorse the same tactics that you have previously condemned.

Welcome to the human race, hypocrite.

By the way… bring it.
 
moghrabi
#19
My point exactly. So you agree it is a act of agression?
 
moghrabi
#20
My point exactly. So you agree it is a act of agression?
 
moghrabi
#21
My point exactly. So you agree it is a act of agression?
 
Paco
#22
Quote: Originally Posted by moghrabi

My point exactly. So you agree it is a act of agression?

Any war is. America's response to Pearl Harbor was aggression. Take a swing at me and I'll respond aggressively.
 
Paco
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by moghrabi

My point exactly. So you agree it is a act of agression?

Any war is. America's response to Pearl Harbor was aggression. Take a swing at me and I'll respond aggressively.
 
Paco
#24
Quote: Originally Posted by moghrabi

My point exactly. So you agree it is a act of agression?

Any war is. America's response to Pearl Harbor was aggression. Take a swing at me and I'll respond aggressively.
 
moghrabi
Avatar
#25
That's what is happening in Iraq. You took a swing at them (an act of agression) and they are responding.
 
moghrabi
Avatar
#26
That's what is happening in Iraq. You took a swing at them (an act of agression) and they are responding.
 
moghrabi
Avatar
#27
That's what is happening in Iraq. You took a swing at them (an act of agression) and they are responding.
 
PatrickB1978
#28
Lets all be realistic about this...the USA ultimately invaded Iraq because it could. But what country in the world could successfully invade the USA? Maybe bugs from the planet Klendathu. Sorry, I just watched Starship Troopers this weekend.
 
PatrickB1978
#29
Lets all be realistic about this...the USA ultimately invaded Iraq because it could. But what country in the world could successfully invade the USA? Maybe bugs from the planet Klendathu. Sorry, I just watched Starship Troopers this weekend.
 
PatrickB1978
#30
Lets all be realistic about this...the USA ultimately invaded Iraq because it could. But what country in the world could successfully invade the USA? Maybe bugs from the planet Klendathu. Sorry, I just watched Starship Troopers this weekend.
 

Similar Threads

13
CIA: We Lied to Congress
by catman | Jul 12th, 2009
6
You Are Being Lied to About Pirates
by Said1 | Jan 6th, 2009
5
Fido lied/deceived me on multiple occasions.
by simoncp22 | Oct 27th, 2006
49
Colin Powell Lied: 100 000 Died
by FiveParadox | Mar 20th, 2006
12
They lied to us
by moghrabi | May 11th, 2005
no new posts