Brexit: Government 'to stand up' for Gibraltar's interests

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,426
1,668
113
Vote overwhelmingly to stay in the EU - and then get slapped in the face by the EU.

The UK has said it will stand up for Gibraltar's interests after the territory accused Spain of using Brexit to forward its territorial aims.

After reported lobbying from Spain, the EU's Brexit negotiation strategy is that decisions affecting Gibraltar will be run past the Spanish government.

Gibraltar's Chief Minister Fabian Picardo said this was "unacceptable".

Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson has held talks with Mr Picardo in an effort to reassure him of the UK's support.

Brexit: Government 'to stand up' for Gibraltar's interests


BBC News
1 April 2017


Gibraltarians voted 96% to 4% in favour of remaining in the EU in the referendum


The UK has said it will stand up for Gibraltar's interests after the territory accused Spain of using Brexit to forward its territorial aims.

After reported lobbying from Spain, the EU's Brexit negotiation strategy is that decisions affecting Gibraltar will be run past the Spanish government.

Gibraltar's Chief Minister Fabian Picardo said this was "unacceptable".

Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson has held talks with Mr Picardo in an effort to reassure him of the UK's support.

Mr Johnson said: "As ever, the UK remains implacable and rock-like in our support for Gibraltar."

An EU source told the BBC the inclusion of the Gibraltar issue in the document had come after lobbying from Spain.

However, Theresa May had not mentioned Gibraltar once in her 2,200-word letter triggering Article 50, starting the Brexit process.

Lord Boswell, chairman of the House of Lords EU Committee, said the government must not give the impression that Gibraltar is an "afterthought".

'Stand firm'


Gibraltar's Chief Minister Fabian Picardo said the British Overseas Territory will not be used as a political pawn by the EU


Clare Moody, Labour MEP for Gibraltar and South West England, told BBC Radio Four's Today programme it was the government's job to "represent the people of Gibraltar".

She said: "I was amazed that they failed to do that in the letter they sent on Wednesday.

"It worries me that we are about to enter into the most detailed negotiations that we have known for decades, and if the government has overlooked the interests of Gibraltar, which is a crucial part of the kind of constitutional arrangements of our membership of the European Union, then what else are they going to overlook as well?"

Christian Hernandez, president of the Gibraltar Chamber of Commerce, told the programme that the British government needed to "stand firm in the face of Spanish bullying".

"We don't want to be independent from the UK.

"We've made it very clear in the last 100 years, in the last 20 years, in the last 15 years, we want a constitutional relationship with the UK where we continue to be part of the UK, and independence is not something we aspire to," he added.

Spain has long contested Britain's 300 year-rule of Gibraltar.

Gibraltarians, who number about 30,000, rejected by 99% to 1% the idea of the UK sharing sovereignty with Spain, in a vote in 2002.

However, Spain has continued to press its territorial claim.

Following last June's EU referendum - in which Gibraltar voted by 96% to 4% to remain in the EU - Spain's then foreign minister suggested shared sovereignty could allow Gibraltarians to maintain some of the benefits of EU membership and enable Spain to "plant its flag" there.

But Alfonso Dastis, his successor, said in January that Spain would not put Gibraltar at the centre of the negotiations and it would be free to leave the EU if it wished.

In its draft Brexit negotiating guidelines, the European Council identified future arrangements for Gibraltar as one of its 26 core principles.

It wrote: "After the UK leaves the union, no agreement between the EU and the UK may apply to the territory of Gibraltar without agreement between Spain and the UK."

Brussels officials were quoted by The Guardian as saying the EU was standing up for its members' interests.

"That means Spain now," a senior EU official told the newspaper.

"Any extension of the deal [after withdrawal] to Gibraltar... will require the support of Spain. [The text] recognises that there are two parties to this dispute."

'Shameful'

But Mr Picardo said: "This draft suggests that Spain is trying to get away with mortgaging the future relationship between the EU and Gibraltar to its usual obsession with our homeland.

"This is a disgraceful attempt by Spain to manipulate the European Council for its own, narrow, political interests.

"Brexit is already complicated enough without Spain trying to complicate it further."

Mr Lopresti, chairman of the UK's All-Party Parliamentary Group on Gibraltar, said there was no question of any negotiation over Gibraltar's future.

He will raise the matter with the secretary general of Nato, of which the UK and Spain are both members.

He said: "It is shameful that the EU have attempted to allow Spain an effective veto over the future of British sovereign territory, flying in the face of the will of the people of Gibraltar."

Labour MP Mary Creagh, a supporter of the Open Britain campaign group, said Gibraltarians risked being treated as "pawns" in the Brexit process.

Commuting issue

Despite Gibraltar voting overwhelmingly to stay in the EU, Gibraltar's government has ruled out any dilution of sovereignty in return for continued access to the European single market or other benefits attached to EU membership.

Key issues in post-Brexit negotiations relating to Gibraltar are likely to be border controls - thousands of workers commute in and out of the territory from the Spanish mainland every day - and airport landing rights.

Gibraltar: key facts



Gibraltarians are British citizens but they run their own affairs under a chief minister

The territory is self-governing in all matters - including taxation - except foreign policy and defence, which are dealt with by the UK government

Despite its small size, Gibraltar is strategically important, standing only 12 miles from the north coast of Africa. It has a UK military base, including a port and airstrip



Brexit: Government 'to stand up' for Gibraltar's interests - BBC News
 
Last edited:

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,426
1,668
113
Coffee House

The EU’s Gibraltar mistake

Fraser Nelson





Photo by Pablo Blazquez Dominguez/Getty Images

Fraser Nelson
2 April 2017
The Spectator

It was quite right for Theresa May to not mention Gibraltar in her Article 50 letter – why should the future of its people be in question in our negotiations? To do so would be to introduce a dangerous notion: that Gibraltar and its people were somehow a bargaining chip. Of course, the press will have fun with the idea that the Prime Minister forgot Gibraltar but far more plausible is Tim Shipman’s story in the Sunday Times today that the idea of mentioning it in the Brexit letter was raised several times – and rejected.

That the EU has brought Gibraltar up as part of the Brexit deals right now is strange and shows a worrying naivety on its part. Some 99pc of Gibraltar citizens have rejected Spain’s demands for joint sovereignty, so why put this question back on the table? An EU diplomat is quoted in the Guardian giving an answer: ”
“Spain are taking this very, very seriously. I think there is support across the board among the member states. Why not? It is not a problem that was born yesterday. It has been with us a long time and we have always listened to both sides. Now we are going to support the member state. That is the philosophy behind it. I wouldn’t think any of the 26 other states will somehow try to undermine this clause.”
Worse still if the EU doing this as a negotiating ploy, a gambit intended to scare the Brits only to be dropped later in return for some concession. It’s simply the wrong button to press with Brits, who are rather sensitive about the protection of fellow citizens.

Tories, in particular, don’t need much provocation to issue reminders of the lengths we once went to to defend the Falkland Islands which have less than a tenth of Gibraltar’s population.

Already, the former Tory leader Michael Howard has been on television drawing parallels with the Falklands War (‘another small group of British people against another Spanish-speaking country’). An unwise and inflammatory comparison, that reminds us why he’s out of frontline politics. He meant, no doubt, to underline the strong British commitment to Gibraltar but war analogies are unhelpful in this context. That said, if Howard hadn’t mentioned the F word, someone else would: on Saturday I spoke to ministers who talking about the Falklands. And listing the other (non-military) retaliation we could make against Spain if it were to mess about with Gibraltar.

Of course, post-Brexit, Spain will have to consider refinements to the already-sealed border with Gibraltar, given that will soon be a non-EU territory. But that involves just one road (the wonderfully-named Winston Churchill Avenue) so it’s hardly Sweden/Norway. So why bring it up as a major issue now? The aim may have been to put the frighteners on the Brits, but the result has been to get a lot of British backs up. And make more in the UK wonder if this negotiation is worth it, and whether Mrs May should walk away sooner rather than later.

The EU is pretty bad at negotiations. Its diplomatic corps is one of the worst in the continent – look at its mishandling of Ukraine, and its stunning inability to cut a free trade deal with any of its major trading partners, ever. If it does manage to come up with a deal that Britain feels able to sign, it will be its first-ever major trade deal success. I’m afraid I’m not optimistic.

Theresa May does not need a deal with the EU. As I argue in my latest Daily Telegraph column, the WTO protections are in place and guarantee small tariffs (averaging about 4.5 per cent) that would anyway be offset by the fall in the pound . The ‘no deal’ scenario really isn’t that bad. But the EU is behaving as if Theresa May is as desperate for a deal as Cameron was. It messed up the Cameron negotiation, overplaying its hand and losing the UK as a result. Its mentioning Gibraltar, a needlessly antagonistic act, suggests it is not learning very fast.

https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/04/theresa-may-right-not-bring-gibraltar/
 
Last edited: