Assad: All foreign troops in Syria without permission are ‘invaders’


Danbones
Free Thinker
#1
Assad: No one invited US to Manbij, all foreign troops in Syria without permission are ‘invaders’

“Any foreign troops coming to Syria without our invitation or consultation or permission, they are invaders, whether they are American, Turkish, or any other one,” Assad told Chinese PHOENIX TV, as cited by the Syrian state-run SANA news agency.

When a journalist asked the Syrian president if Damascus had “opened doors” for American troops in Aleppo province’s city of Manbij, Assad said “No, we didn’t.”

“What are they [foreign troops] going to do? To fight ISIS [Islamic State, formerly ISIL]? The Americans lost nearly every war. They lost in Iraq, they had to withdraw at the end. Even in Somalia, let alone Vietnam in the past and Afghanistan.”

According to Assad, the US “didn’t succeed anywhere they sent troops, they only create a mess; they are very good in creating problems and destroying, but they are very bad in finding solutions.”

The Pentagon confirmed earlier in March that US troops had been sent to Manbij to prevent conflict between US-backed Kurdish forces and rebels backed by Turkey.

Without foreign intervention, the Syrian war “will take a few months” to bring to an end, Assad noted.

“The complexity of this war is the foreign intervention. This is the problem,” he said.

https://www.rt.com/news/380256-assad...oops-invaders/ (external - login to view)
President al-Assad to Chinese Phoenix TV: any foreign troops coming to Syria without permission are invaders-video – Syrian Arab News Agency (external - login to view)

Why are the US REALLY in Syria?
 
Danbones
Free Thinker
#2
Al-Qaeda Agrees to Temporary Ceasefire in Syria. Guess Who Vouches For Them?
An Al-Qaeda offshoot has agreed to a temporary ceasefire to allow for humanitarian evacuations. You'll never guess the bulwark of democracy who is acting as a guarantor...

...STOP TERROR @S_T_O_P_TERROR
Joe Biden - #ISIS terrorists armed by Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE.
TURKEY IS SUPPORTING ISIS, AL NUSRA #HAMAS #HEZBOLLAH#MASA @POTUS

Can we stop pretending that Washington and its client states aren't up to their necks in blood? Thanks. Much appreciated.
russia-insider.com/en/al-qaed...s-them/ri19375 (external - login to view)

just sayin
 
darkbeaver
Republican
+1
#3
Quote: Originally Posted by DanbonesView Post

Al-Qaeda Agrees to Temporary Ceasefire in Syria. Guess Who Vouches For Them?
An Al-Qaeda offshoot has agreed to a temporary ceasefire to allow for humanitarian evacuations. You'll never guess the bulwark of democracy who is acting as a guarantor...

...STOP TERROR @S_T_O_P_TERROR
Joe Biden - #ISIS terrorists armed by Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE.
TURKEY IS SUPPORTING ISIS, AL NUSRA #HAMAS #HEZBOLLAH#MASA @POTUS

Can we stop pretending that Washington and its client states aren't up to their necks in blood? Thanks. Much appreciated.
Al-Qaeda Agrees to Temporary Ceasefire in Syria. Guess Who Vouches For Them? (external - login to view)

just sayin

You're asking a very religious bunch to agree that thier God is a very bad God, the worlds prime mass murderer and agent of chaos and evil, They will never accept those facts even while being crushed by the consequences of thier miseducations.

None of that exonerates the Canadian allie.
 
Jinentonix
No Party Affiliation
+3
#4  Top Rated Post
These are my simple rules for going to war.

A) There better be a goddam good reason to go. Nationalism, imperialism or hegemony are not valid reasons.
B) If there is a goddam good reason, then go big or stay home. If you're not willing to fully commit to victory, you might as well stay home and avoid a lot of misery all the way 'round.
C) Stay the hell out of another nation's civil war.
D) Even if you are invited.
E) If it's a neighbouring country, secure your border and stay put!
 
darkbeaver
Republican
+1
#5
The US remains this earths greatest threat to democracy and free institutions, it is blatantly in violation of the rights of humanity and deserves the full attention of THE LAW. Of course it already has the attention of that law and is in the mid stages of choking on the vomit of it's own monstrous hypocrisy.

One can only hope its innocent will be spared even as its millions of innocent victims have not. Nothing but justice can come from its final and complete destruction. Tasteing the fate of Sodom will be thier lot when justice be done. Thier debt will be cancelled the hard way and thier leaders know this as fact.
 
Tecumsehsbones
#6
We don't have Assad's permission? Oh, dear. This is terrible. He might have security escort us off the premises.

Quote: Originally Posted by JinentonixView Post

These are my simple rules for going to war.

A) There better be a goddam good reason to go. Nationalism, imperialism or hegemony are not valid reasons.
B) If there is a goddam good reason, then go big or stay home. If you're not willing to fully commit to victory, you might as well stay home and avoid a lot of misery all the way 'round.
C) Stay the hell out of another nation's civil war.
D) Even if you are invited.
E) If it's a neighbouring country, secure your border and stay put!

"Any war for any reason other than to defend our shores or protect the Bill of Rights is a racket."

-- USMC Gen. Smedley Butler, two-time Medal of Honor winner
 
darkbeaver
Republican
+1
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

We don't have Assad's permission? Oh, dear. This is terrible. He might have security escort us off the premises.
"Any war for any reason other than to defend our shores or protect the Bill of Rights is a racket."
-- USMC Gen. Smedley Butler, two-time Medal of Honor winner

There's a sort of conflict in your mind between those two sentences of your's, is there or not? How can you hold both? Which one will prevail?
 
Tecumsehsbones
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaverView Post

There's a sort of conflict in your mind between those two sentences of your's, is there or not?

I don't see one.

Quote:

How can you hold both?

Easy.

Quote:

Which one will prevail?

I don't see why one or the other needs to prevail. They can coexist without difficulty.
 
darkbeaver
Republican
+1
#9
As long as you're comfortable with the inevitable escort off the Syrian lawn I suppose I'll just have to accept your position as reasonable given your educational history.
 
Tecumsehsbones
#10
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaverView Post

As long as you're comfortable with the inevitable escort off the Syrian lawn I suppose I'll just have to accept your position as reasonable given your educational history.

Eventually we'll get bored and wander off, as we've done with every war since '45. And Assad will undoubtedly crow that his inspired leadership and the purity of his manly essences drove us out.
 
Danbones
Free Thinker
#11
You guys haven't won a war in what, a century???

it sure ain't your gear that's fikked up

McCain Furious At Rex Tillerson For Saying Assad Can Stay

"In other words, the entire proxy conflict, with thousands of lives lost, and millions of Syrian immigrants flooding Europe, has been for nothing.
www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-0...assad-can-stay (external - login to view)

lol
john "the song bird" McCain the "traitor of Hanoi" thinks the US should stay too
Last edited by Danbones; 4 weeks ago at 03:18 PM..
 
no new posts