Brexit was a revolt against snobs like Tony Blair

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,400
1,667
113
The brass neck of Tony Blair. The Brexit vote was 'based on imperfect knowledge', says the man who unleashed barbarism across the Middle East on the basis of a student dissertation he printed off the internet. Who marched thousands into unimaginable horror on the basis of myth and spin. That NHS claim on the side of the Leave bus is small fry, infinitesimally small fry, in comparison with the guff this bloke came out with. It didn’t cause anyone to die, for one. For Blair to lecture the British people about truth is an affront to memory and decency and reason. No self-respecting citizen should put up with it...

Coffee House

Brexit was a revolt against snobs like Tony Blair


Brendan O'Neill




Brendan O'Neill
17 February 2017
The Spectator



The brass neck of Tony Blair. The Brexit vote was ‘based on imperfect knowledge’, says the man who unleashed barbarism across the Middle East on the basis of a student dissertation he printed off the internet. Who marched thousands into unimaginable horror on the basis of myth and spin. That NHS claim on the side of the Leave bus is small fry, infinitesimally small fry, in comparison with the guff this bloke came out with. It didn’t cause anyone to die, for one. For Blair to lecture the British people about truth is an affront to memory and decency and reason. No self-respecting citizen should put up with it.

Blair made his comments about our ‘imperfect knowledge’ — dimwits that we are — in a speech for Open Britain, a cross-party pro-EU group, in London this morning. The speech sums up the elitism and arrogance and contempt for democracy of those Remainers who just cannot accept that they lost. ‘The people voted without knowledge of the true terms of Brexit’, Blair haughtily declared. Rubbish. We all knew what it meant to tick the box saying ‘Leave the European Union’ — it meant leaving the European Union. It meant what it said — and we meant what we said.

Blair and the connected, moneyed weepers for the EU who make up Open Britain can’t get their heads around this. They think we didn’t know what we were doing. And so they’ve come to enlighten us and make us think again. Remainers must ‘rise up’, says Blair, and turn the throng’s ‘imperfect knowledge’ into ‘informed knowledge’ by giving us ‘easy to understand’ information about how Brexit will ‘cause real damage to the country’. Risen, brave, ‘informed’ Remainers must hold back the ‘rush over the cliff’s edge’, he said.


Do voters have buyers’ remorse over Brexit? This YouGov poll suggests voters have consistently said the outcome of the referendum vote was correct


The whole thing stinks to the heavens of paternalism. Blair is positioning himself and his switched-on mates as the possessors of information that we the imperfect plebs lack. Like lemmings we’re leaping off the cliff, and this good man must save us. He must impart to us his wisdom — in ‘easy to understand’ ways, of course, because we can’t handle anything too complex — and in the process fulfil the duty of the political leader to ‘give answers’ rather than ‘ride the anger’ of the public. He depicts Open Britain as cool and knowledgable, and Leavers as uninformed and angry. It’s positively aristocratic, with Open Britain fancying itself as the small but beautiful font of wisdom in a land of madness.

And of course he thinks we’re prejudiced too. They all do. ‘Virtually the only practical arguments still advanced under the general rubric of “taking back control” are immigration and the European Court of Justice,’ he said. But really, it’s all about immigration. ‘Immigration is the issue’, he declared. Not true. Immigration is an issue for some Leavers, but it isn’t the only issue. As Lord Ashcroft’s poll found, 33 percent of Leave voters said the main reason they rejected the EU was to ‘regain control over immigration’, but 49 percent said their main reason was ‘the principle that decisions about the UK should be taken in the UK’. They were voting for democracy. It is ‘imperfect knowledge’ — scrap that, it’s just a poisonous slur — to say immigration is the only issue and that all Leavers are darkly obsessed with it.

Blair spoke in the language of revolution. Remainers must ‘rise up’. He talked about the need for a ‘revolt’, by ‘force of argument’, against the Leave vote. Excitable media outlets have gone even further, describing his speech as a call ‘for people to “rise up” against Brexit’, a plea that ‘Britain must rise up against Brexit’. This is embarrassing. No amount of radical-sounding lingo or blather about uprisings can disguise the entirely elitist nature of Blair’s campaign to defame the Leave vote and ultimately get it overturned. If this is a revolt, it’s a revolt of the elites against the public, against the majority, against the largest democratic cry in the history of this nation.

Where is this ‘Britain’ that’s expected to rise up against Brexit? A majority in Britain wants Brexit, still, even following months and months of ceaseless fearmongering and accusations of prejudice by a political and media class that thinks Brexit is insane and its supporters dumb. Polls show that buyers’ remorse is a myth: Leavers still want to leave. A recent poll found that 62 percent of those surveyed think Theresa May’s recently outlined policy to Brexit — that basically we’re leaving and that’s it — is the right and respectful way forward. Blair is raging against the May approach, the approach the public backs. Polls also show that significant numbers of Remain voters are ‘coming to terms with the result’. Blair talks of rising up but he’s leading a reactionary movement — an ugly, condescending, minority reaction against what huge numbers of people want.

Blair’s speech was packed with the politics of ‘we know better’, with that same elitist conviction that motored so many of his policies and pronouncements when he was PM. Back then his government vastly expanded the nanny state, invented the Orwellian ‘politics of behaviour’, droned on about Broken Britain and how Blair was the man to fix it, to fix us, to make us better parents, healthier, less fat, less stupid, less likely to get drunk or smoke. And now he’s back with the same moralistic zeal — the returned saviour of a people witlessly ‘rushing over the cliff’s edge’.

What he doesn’t realise is that Brexit was a vote against this politics of ‘we know better’. Against this new paternalism. Against the Third Way outlook of Brussels and Blairism with its elevation of technocracy over democracy. Against the new oligarchies that have insulated themselves and their decision-making from popular opinion. Against the notion that politics should be done by experts rather than by the masses, by clever people in Brussels or Open Britain rather than by Welsh factory workers or northern housewives or Essex Man. The people of Britain have already risen up, Mr Blair, and it was against everything you stand for.

Does Theresa May's Brexit plan respect the outcome of the referendum?

YES: 62%
NO: 13%
DON'T KNOW: 25%

Source:https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.n...mesResults_170118_VI_Trackers_MaySpeech_W.pdf

Brexit was a revolt against snobs like Tony Blair | Coffee House
 
Last edited:

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,400
1,667
113


The Cuprinol diva pulls out the old ham-theatrics one more time: QUENTIN LETTS sees a sun-tanned and messianic Tony Blair breathlessly exhort Remoaners to 'rise up against the Brexit vote'

By Quentin Letts for the Daily Mail
18 February 2017

The muzzle was more prominent, as happens with age, but this was still the ham-thespian Blair of old: Angular frown lines, two hooking eyebrows, a slightly crossed, begging-spaniel gaze to the cameras as he declared his ‘mission’ to overturn the EU referendum result.

Interesting word, ‘mission’. Did he mean it in the military or evangelising sense? Does Temperance League Tony intend, with hosannas and tambourine-bashing, to convert us to Brussels federalism?

Yesterday morning’s speech was delivered at the City offices of Bloomberg, where four years ago David Cameron promised to give voters the say on Europe.


Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair delivers a keynote speech at a pro-EU event

Yesterday’s event was arranged by the Remain campaign under its new badge, Open Britain. Privately-invited onlookers included Cherie Blair, Anji Hunter (wife of Sky News’s Adam Boulton), former Tory health secretary Stephen Dorrell and Blairite Labour MPs Pat McFadden, Heidi Alexander and Siobhain McDonagh.

Their exiled Dauphin delivered his text with the staccato riffs and cheesy pauses first sold to us in the early 1990s. He was as bronzed as a modern-day Cuprinol man, with a touch of Juan- les-Pins tennis coach round the leathery dewlaps.

There were furtive downward glances – deliciously bogus hesitation – before each sly little outrage slipped out its burrow.

He did not intend to be rude about Theresa May – but proceeded to slag her off at length. The voters had ‘no widespread appetite’ to revisit the Brexit debate – but he wanted a second referendum all the same. This was such a rounded speech that it contained its own naked contradictions.

He threw himself into the fray almost with a choking sob – ‘OK, gonna go straight into it’. There was not even time for an adoring Mandelson to grasp his slender ankle shrieking: ‘Don’t do it, Tony, they’re not worth it.’


He did not intend to be rude about Theresa May – but proceeded to slag her off at length

Mr Blair was a little breathless, as though keen to show us how brave he was – the only person left with principles! ‘I don’t know if we can succeed,’ he gasped. In a Tintin book this would have been accompanied by three droplets of sweat jumping off his brow.

Fading divas retain their theatricality. It’s the notes that go wrong. Hundreds of thousands of today’s voters were not even born when this man won his first general election. The Blair era was a different world. How odd to think that this man once understood the power of the new.

Soon we had the customary Blair moan about the Right-wing Press and its ‘cartel’.

Darn it. Who told him we Fleet Street political sketchwriters regularly have tea and sticky buns together to carve up the adjectives and metaphors?


Mr Blair was a little breathless, as though keen to show us how brave he was – the only person left with principles!

The clout of the Right-wing Press – which liberals always like to say is shrivelling – may be slight compared to the suggestive powers of the BBC. Its live coverage of Mr Blair’s speech was accompanied by a side-box with a swirling Union Flag. Trying to nudge us to see Blair as patriotic?

He patronised Mrs May, placing heavy emphasis on ‘I’ as he said ‘I know how demanding the job of leadership is’. She was offering ‘Government by one-off plebiscite’. And now, er, he wants another such plebiscite.

His biggest rehearsed gulp came before he attacked Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party, saying ‘the debilitation of Labour is the facilitator of Brexit’. Too many syllables in that soundbite.


His pronunciation of ‘ideologue’ was unusual, being more ‘idi’ at the start than ‘idea’

As he spoke of the need for a new ‘movement’ it almost felt as though he was launching a rival political party, as Roy Jenkins and David Owen and Shirley Williams and that bloke no one remembers did in Limehouse in 1981.

The May Government was ‘mono-purpose’, and ‘obsessed with Brexit’, he said, right eye not quite twitching.

His pronunciation of ‘ideologue’ was unusual, being more ‘idi’ at the start than ‘idea’. And more than once he said politics had become ‘surreal’.

When a multi-millionaire PR man for foreign dictators comes hectoring us about the result of the biggest election our country has held, and does so in the name of liberal democracy, surreal is certainly one description. Bonkers, self-delusional egomania is another.
 
Last edited:

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
Little Canadarers leaving a global union to become little and isolated.

"Little Canada" outperforms the UK by every measure. We have free trade agreements with both the EU and America. Britain is not politically capable of doing that. You are not a "trading nation" anymore, anyway (.. a "consumer nation" is what you have become) so perhaps it doesn't matter to you.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,400
1,667
113
"Little Canada" outperforms the UK by every measure.

Go on then. Shows us these areas you outperform us in.

I should remind you that Britain's economy is to be the fastest-growing in the G7 for the next 30 years, partially as a result of Brexit.

There is no doubt, however, amongst us more enlightened people that Canada's independence was instigated by low-information and racist voters who jumped before they thought and left Canada isolated and exposed.

We have free trade agreements with both the EU and America.

And because the cumbersome EU is so slow in creating trade deals with countries the deal with Canada took years to pull off.

Outside the EU Britain can now do her own free trade deals with whoever she wants and much more quickly.

The Chinese are happy about Brexit. Frustrated as they are with the EU's snail-like pace in agreeing to a free trade deal with them, they are now happy they can quickly secure a trade deal with Britain.

You are not a "trading nation" anymore

Why not?
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
"Little Canada" outperforms the UK by every measure. We have free trade agreements with both the EU and America. Britain is not politically capable of doing that. You are not a "trading nation" anymore, anyway (.. a "consumer nation" is what you have become) so perhaps it doesn't matter to you.
And we have toothpaste and brushes......


 

Remington1

Council Member
Jan 30, 2016
1,469
1
36
Blair probably truly believes he's speaking for the majority, but I don't think he is at all. Brexit is the same as Trump, the ones' who lost cannot accept it, shut up and move on.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
Go on then. Shows us these areas you outperform us in.

GDP per capita:

World GDP per capita Ranking 2016 - StatisticsTimes.com

Your "growth rate" is because the bottom totally fell out of your economy a decade ago and you've spent all of that "growth" time returning to where you used to be.

Education:

http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/dec/07/world-education-rankings-maths-science-reading

Quality of life:

Countries With the Best Quality of Life | US News Best Countries

Life Expectancy:

Geoba.se: Gazetteer - The World - Life Expectancy - Top 100+ By Country (2017)


What do you make and export, besides whiskey and tea cups, that anybody wants or cannot get somewhere else for a better price and quality?
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,400
1,667
113

Not a very reliable way of measuring wealth.

Your "growth rate" is because the bottom totally fell out of your economy a decade ago and you've spent all of that "growth" time returning to where you used to be.

The growth rate is because of the British people and the economic policies enacted by Thatcher and other PMs since.


World's best education systems:

1. South Korea; 2. Japan; 3. Singapore; 4. Hong Kong; 5. Finland; 6. UK; 7. Canada; 8. Netherlands

UK 'second best education in Europe' - BBC News


No wonder the local beavers bite off their wotsits: Why one man won't be joining the rush to move to Canada


By Philip Delves Broughton
30th June 2008
Daily Mail

The pitch is boringly familiar: Come to Canada! Voted best country to live in by the United Nations four years in a row! Tolerant! Cheap! Great free health care! Lots of space!

That final element should be the giveaway. Despite being larger than its southern neighbour, the United States, it has around one tenth of the population, 33million to America's 300million (its population is also around half that of Britain's, despite Britain being much much smaller).

Despite banging its own drum for decades, calling on the world to gather on its shores, Canada still looks like one of those poor young girls at a trade show, thrusting flyers at disinterested passers-by.

It is the big, earnest, empty restaurant which can't understand why the scrappier joint next door is hopping. People just do not want to go.


'The beaver, which has come to represent Canada as the eagle does the United States and the lion Britain, is a flat-tailed, slowwitted, toothy rodent known to bite off its own testicles or to stand under its own falling trees.'

The late newspaper columnist, June Callwood, summed up Canada's status compared to its great English-speaking rivals: 'The beaver, which has come to represent Canada as the eagle does the United States and the lion Britain, is a flat-tailed, slow-witted, toothy rodent known to bite off its own testicles or to stand under its own falling trees.'

And yet, for Britons considering the latest blandishments to move to the Land of the Maple Leaf, the argument tends to go like this: Why carry on hacking away in the UK, paying a monstrous mortgage on a house, battling through traffic and public transport while being taxed within an inch of my life when I could be making the same money, living in a much bigger house, getting lots of fresh air and at least getting good schools and health care for my high taxes?

On the surface, of course, this makes a lot of sense.

But as someone who, in the course of my reporting duties from North America, has visited Canada on more occasions than I care to remember, I should warn you that there are a number of other factors to consider before you wave goodbye to Blighty.

First, the climate makes Britain's look positively Mediterranean. The winters drag on for months, with temperatures well below freezing. The nights are interminable. And in summer you have a choice between extremely humid and dry and windless. You're either sitting in a steam room or a sauna.

In Toronto, an entire subterranean network of passages and shopping malls has been built for its inhabitants to scurry around all winter. London feels like Nassau by comparison. And don't think for one moment that there will be enough diversions indoors to distract from the climate.


The British Museum, which has 13 million objects in its collections. Culturally, Canada does not hold a candle to Britain

Culturally, Canada does not hold a candle to Britain. Its museums and orchestras are resoundingly second tier, though it may have an edge in country music festivals.

This is, after all, the home of Shania Twain, whose full-throated warblings make Dolly Parton sound sophisticated.

In the dramatic arts, Canada's greatest recent contribution - unless you include Jim Carrey and Pamela Anderson - is the incomprehensible, semi-nude contortion act of Cirque du Soleil. And as for its newspapers, they are lifeless and hobbled by the provincialism which divides the country.


Canadian celebrities: Pamela Anderson and Jim Carrey are proud Canadians... despite becoming U.S. citizens in recent years

Sure, Canada has been through a food revolution similar to Britain's, but still the way to a Canadian's heart is not through fancy Newfoundland oysters, but with ' poutine' - chips smothered with cheese curds and gravy. It makes a chip butty look like the healthy option.

Then there's its politics. However tawdry and disappointing the British politicians may sometimes seem, the Canadian version is no better. Canada now has a conservative prime minister, Stephen Harper, but for most of the 20th century it was run by the Left-of-centre Liberal Party which created a culture of big government and high taxes.

As the Canadian poet Irving Layton once said, the Canadian political and intellectual communities' have a tendency to regard ' cowardice as wisdom, philistinism as Olympian serenity and the spitefulness of the weak as moral indignation'.

As for the economy. Britain's prospects may stink at the moment, but the notion of Canada as some Shangri-La is false. Yesterday a report was published saying that Canada was suffering from endemic complacency.

'In almost every major category of socio-economic performance studied, Canada's performance is slipping, causing it to fall behind countries that are its peers, partners and competitors,' said the report issued by The Conference Board of Canada, an independent thinktank.

The economic problems, the report said, were only being concealed by the surging price of the commodities being dug out of Canada's rich soil. When prices fall back to earth, Canada will be in deep trouble.

Move there now to grab one of the jobs sitting vacant, and you may soon be sitting on a fast-deflating bubble.

Canada's hiring pirates are especially keen on carrying off British construction workers and mining specialists, technology experts and most depressingly of all, doctors and nurses.

They believe that the restructuring of the National Health Service will force many British doctors and nurses overseas where their services are actually valued and properly rewarded.

These doctors and nurses should be warned, however, that their work, to quote the America humourist P.J. O'Rourke will mainly involve 'treating hockey injuries and curing sinus infections that come from trying to pronounce French vowels'.

Ah yes, hockey. If you thought British sport was becoming crude and violent, try watching two teams of toothless brutes sliding around on ice and pausing every few minutes to beat the daylights out of each other. It makes the Premiership look like synchronised swimming.

However bad Britain may seem, trust me, moving to Canada is not the answer. Why not try somewhere more appealing. Siberia, for example.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...sits-Why-man-wont-joining-rush-to-Canada.html


Hardly any difference at all.

What do you make and export, besides whiskey and tea cups, that anybody wants or cannot get somewhere else for a better price and quality?

The United Kingdom is the 9th largest export economy in the world and the 11th most complex economy according to the Economic Complexity Index (ECI). In 2014, the United Kingdom exported $472B and imported $663B, resulting in a negative trade balance of $191B. In 2014 the GDP of the United Kingdom was $2.99T and its GDP per capita was $40.2k.

The top exports of the United Kingdom are Cars ($46B), Gold ($37.4B), Crude Petroleum ($23.1B), Refined Petroleum ($22.1B) and Packaged Medicaments ($19.6B), using the 1992 revision of the HS (Harmonized System) classification. Its top imports are Cars ($47.3B), Crude Petroleum ($34.1B), Refined Petroleum ($27.7B), Packaged Medicaments ($21.5B) and Computers ($16.9B).

The top export destinations of the United Kingdom are the United States ($51B), Germany ($46.5B), the Netherlands ($34.2B), Switzerland ($33.6B) and France ($27B). The top import origins are Germany ($100B), China ($62.7B), the Netherlands ($50.7B), the United States ($44.4B) and France ($41.5B).

The United Kingdom borders Ireland by land and Belgium, Germany, Denmark, France, the Netherlands and Norway by sea.

OEC - United Kingdom (GBR) Exports, Imports, and Trade Partners