The pro-EU lobby have struck a blow against Brexit. Here's how we fight back

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
There can now be no doubt about it. The powerful forces opposing Britain's departure from the European Union are organised, determined, and well on their way to frustrating the clearly-expressed will of the majority of British voters to leave the corrupt, undemocratic and clearly collapsing European Union.

The question for the Leave majority is: what are those of us who want to escape the shackles binding us to this rotten corpse going to do about the campaign to keep us in chains?

This is what we do...

The powerful forces of the pro-EU lobby have struck a blow against Brexit. Here's how we fight back


Nigel Jones
3 December 2016
The Telegraph
5 Comments


The Richmond by-election will embolden Remainers

There can now be no doubt about it. The powerful forces opposing Britain's departure from the European Union are organised, determined, and well on their way to frustrating the clearly-expressed will of the majority of British voters to leave the corrupt, undemocratic and clearly collapsing European Union.

The question for the Leave majority is: what are those of us who want to escape the shackles binding us to this rotten corpse going to do about the campaign to keep us in chains?

We should never underestimate the forces opposing Brexit. As they did during the Referendum campaign itself, the Remainers can count on the entire broadcast media – the BBC, Channel 4 and Sky; half of the national newspapers –the Guardian and Observer, the FT, the Times, the Mirror, the i and the online Independent; and the overwhelming majority of the Establishment and the great and the good. Most MPs in the current Parliament; the Judiciary, the Churches; the CBI, TUC, and the faceless corporations who make money move across markets around the world.



About the only thing they do not have on their side is the majority of the British people.

In the shock that followed the Leave vote on June 23, these forces were at first muted. They were stunned into silence by the realisation that ordinary people – those who felt less than thrilled to see jobs exported and the more unwelcome effects of mass migration, loss of sovereignty and cultural change – had dared to defy the universal advice of experts and their social betters to vote Leave.

But that brief period of blissful silence did not last. Those who had grown used to dictating the direction of travel on Britain's journey into the European superstate were never going to take their defeat lying down, and soon the murmuring began. The "not in my name" pro-EU mobs took to the streets; the bleating "Remoaner" articles started their daily appearance in the left-liberal press; and the legal moves aimed at thwarting the people's will began to crank into action.

At first, the Remainers hid their real aim behind clouds of obfuscation. They were, they claimed, not questioning the verdict delivered on June 23. Oh, no! They "respected" the decision taken by the British electorate. They merely – like umpires in a village cricket match – wanted to ensure that play was fair, the rules of the game properly observed, and that there would be no nasty, painful, "hard" Brexit.

In other words, they wanted to remain inside the single market; obey the edicts of the European Court of Justice, and carry on letting vast swathes of people cross open borders under the flag of "free movement". Basically the idea was to leave the EU in name only, and continue as before to submit to the vast array of deadening regulations dictated from Brussels.

But now, emboldened by the deafening silence of the Government, the Remainers are revealing their true intentions and coming out in their real colours: blue, emblazoned with gold stars. Articles are appearing in their house journal The Guardian on how to stop Brexit happening; the Supreme Court is almost certain next week to throw a huge spanner in the Government's works; and now wealthy, leafy Richmond – number 17 in the country's list of remain-voting hotspots – has overturned a 23,000 Tory majority and elected a Lib Dem MP who makes no secret of her intention to "override" Brexit.


The Supreme Court is almost certain next week to throw a huge spanner in the Government's works

If all this does not sound the tocsin of alarm in the sleepy Leave camp, then nothing will. It is more than high time for the Brexit majority to organise the fightback. Here is what needs to be done.

The myriad groups backing Brexit urgently need to do what they signally failed to do in their otherwise successful referendum campaign: unite.

The Leave majority in the Conservative party should set aside their differences with Ukip, the party which actually made the referendum happen and, working with Ukip's new leader Paul Nuttall, should mount a grassroots campaign to press the Government in the direction of the EU's exit door.

Taking a leaf from Labour's Momentum movement, the Tory wing of such a campaign should capture those constituencies they do not already control, and require all Conservative MPs to support the Government in its efforts to achieve a clean break with the EU.


The Conservatives, working with Ukip's new leader Paul Nuttall, should mount a grassroots campaign to press the Government in the direction of the EU's exit door.


Meanwhile Ukip, with Nuttall as the only working class leader of a major party for generations, should concentrate on winning the Labour seats in the North and Midlands which voted Leave in June, but whose MPs are stubbornly sticking to Remain. These boroughs are ripe for the plucking.

The Government, for its part, should stop its nervous Nellie shilly-shallying, abandon its Omerta vows of silence, and openly and proudly shout from the rooftops its intention to leave the EU, with or without the permission of those who lost the referendum.

If that is thwarted by the men in wigs, Mrs May should have the courage of her convictions and call a Brexit General Election in the New Year to produce a new Brexit Parliament committed to negotiating our early departure from the EU.

With the Tories leading Corbyn's floundering Labour party by a whopping 16 points in the polls, there can be little doubt as to the outcome of such a contest. It would be a bold judge, peer or Guardian feature writer who would, in the wake of such a triumph, attempt to delay or frustrate our future freedom any further.

As Churchill said in another context : "Let us go forward together and put these grave matters to the test". What on earth are we waiting for?

The powerful forces of the pro-EU lobby have struck a blow against Brexit. Here's how we fight back
 
Last edited:

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
The anti-Brexit Liberal Democrats unexpectedly gained a U.K. parliamentary seat in a by-election, a result that may further complicate Prime Minister Theresa May’s efforts to begin the process of leaving the European Union early next year.

Liberal Democrat candidate Sarah Olney won the seat of Richmond Park, a southwest London district that overwhelmingly backed staying in the EU in June’s referendum. Olney, who pledged to vote against the invoking of Article 50 that starts the process of quitting the EU, overturned a 23,000 vote majority won last year by pro-Brexit Zac Goldsmith, who was running as an independent with support from May’s Tories.

“The people of Richmond Park and North Kingston have sent a shockwave through this Conservative Brexit government, and our message is clear,” Olney said in a speech after the result was announced in the early hours of Friday. “We do not want a hard Brexit.

We do not want to be pulled out of the single market, and we will not let intolerance, division and fear win.”

The party, which held the district until 2010, put Brexit at the heart of the contest, calling for a second referendum on the exit terms achieved by May and threatening to vote in Parliament against her plan to trigger the two-year countdown to leaving by the end of March. Olney won 20,510 votes compared to 18,638 for Goldsmith and 1,515 for the Labour Party’s Christian Wolmar. The result cuts May’s majority in the 650-member House of Commons to just 12.

Brexit Blow for May as Pro-EU Party Wins London By-Election - Bloomberg Quint
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Endless months of hubris from Blackleaf and now, suddenly, we have a problem.

The bollocks detector is off the charts.
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
5,728
3,600
113
Edmonton
Unfortunately, I'm not surprised. Look at what's happening in the US. Riots in the streets, demonstrations etc., Why? Because the lefties HATE losing and refuse to accept the will of the people who are too stupid to know what's good for them. Honestly? This world is in a shambles and it doesn't look all that good for the future. The Left who always states how everyone else who doesn't agree with them as bigoted/ or racist or homophobic et al when, in fact, they are the ones who are all of those and more. They are the most intolerant of peoples.


JMHO
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
The anti-Brexit Liberal Democrats unexpectedly gained a U.K. parliamentary seat in a by-election, a result that may further complicate Prime Minister Theresa May’s efforts to begin the process of leaving the European Union early next year.

In a constituency which overwhelmingly voted Remain in the referendum. Yet the dopey Remoaners are trying to have us believe the people in that constituency are now rejecting Brexit - yet they never accepted it in the first place!

Having said that, I believe there should be a second by-election in Richmond Park as the people have voted the wrong way. They're obviously thick and uneducated and the people need to be given a chance to change their mind and vote the right way.

In fact, if I was a Remoaner I'd actually be WORRIED about the result of the Richmond Park by-election rather than celebrating it. As Ross Clark said in yesterday's Spectator:

If we interpret the result – as the LibDems have encouraged us to do – as a straight vote on Brexit, we should treat Sarah Olney’s vote as a proxy for Remain and Zac Goldsmith’s vote as a proxy for Leave. If you do that it came out as 49.7 per cent in favour of Remain and 45.1 per cent for Leave. Yet in the referendum in June the Richmond Park constituency voted 72.3 per cent to 27.7 per cent in favour of Remain. Yesterday’s by-election, in other words, could be interpreted as a huge swing to Leave.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
COFFEE HOUSE STEERPIKE

Listen: Lib Dems cut disastrous Sarah Olney interview short


Steerpike
2 December 2016
The Spectator



Sarah Olney’s honeymoon period as the newly elected MP for Richmond Park has come to an abrupt end. Hours after ousting Zac Goldsmith from the seat, the Liberal Democrat appeared on Talk Radio to give an interview to Julia Hartley-Brewer about her victory.

Alas things didn’t get off to the best start when Hartley-Brewer began by asking ‘when’s the second by-election’ — in a thinly-veiled dig at the Lib Dems’ call for a second referendum on the EU. In this vein, Hartley-Brewer suggested that the people of Richmond Park might not have known what they were really voting for:

JHB: When is the second by-election going to be held?

SO: What do you mean?

JHB: Well, we don’t really know if voters knew what they were voting for when they voted for you, so should we have a second ballot? You want a second EU referendum don’t you?

SO: I was very clear in my campaign what I was voting for and the voters have returned me to Parliament with a very clear mandate.

JHB: A clear mandate — but less than 50 pc of the people voted for you. Are you sure you have that mandate?

After an awkward couple of minutes, Olney fell silent and her press officer went on to end the call. Not the best first day in the job by all accounts.

Listen: Lib Dems cut disastrous Sarah Olney interview short | Coffee House
 

Remington1

Council Member
Jan 30, 2016
1,469
1
36
"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws" Rothschild.