Brexit-bashers like Blair and Branson are the real enemies of the people

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,418
1,668
113
Here’s a tip for judges, businessmen, peers, politicians and former PMs who don’t like being called ‘enemies of the people’: stop behaving like enemies of the people...

Coffee House

Brexit-bashers like Blair and Branson are the real enemies of the people

Brendan O'Neill






Brendan O'Neill
23 November 2016
The Spectator

Here’s a tip for judges, businessmen, peers, politicians and former PMs who don’t like being called ‘enemies of the people’: stop behaving like enemies of the people. This week it is reported that Tony Blair is polishing his toothy grin to make a comeback into British politics, potentially as thwarter, or just tamer, of the ‘catastrophe’ of Brexit. It’s also reported that Richard Branson, the Brexit-bashing billionaire, has offered ‘tens of thousands’ of pounds to a gang of the great and good who want either to reverse the result of the referendum in which us dumb plebs made such a grave error, or at least insist that a second referendum be held so that we have a chance to redeem ourselves by giving the right, EU-worshipping answer this time round.

An email written by arch Blairite Alan Milburn, leaked to the Independent, suggests this new group is making ‘substantial progress’. It is winning ‘heavy financial, political and corporate backing’, the Indie says. Branson reportedly wants to give it office space and cash. Bob Geldof is in talks with it. Geldof, of course, thinks Brexit voters were an ‘army of stupidity’, part of a ‘distracted populace’ that is ‘loath to accept or acknowledge’ basic political truths. We’re ignoramuses, basically, and need clever people and celebs to put us straight.

The group has also reached out to Freuds, the public-relations firm founded by Matthew Freud, a buddy of Blair’s. And it’s been talking to Nick Clegg, Chuka Umunna and David Lammy, all loud-mouthed opponents of Brexit, and by extension of the silly little people who voted for it. Lammy has previously said he wants to ‘stop this madness’ — by which he means Brexit — because we ‘cannot usher in rule by plebiscite which unleashes the ‘wisdom’ of resentment and prejudice’. Those are his scare quotes around ‘wisdom’, because of course we aren’t wise at all: we’re resentful, prejudiced, awful, stupid — a whole army of stupidity.

What a motley crew. What a bunch of elitists. They have no shame. These are the kind of people who harp on about post-truth politics — Umunna has said the Vote Leave campaign ‘epitomised post-truth politics’ — yet they’re reportedly cosying up to Tony Blair, global overlord of post-truth, who destroyed an entire country on the basis of a pack of lies. Recent reports make it sound as if Blair, panicked by Brexit and unimpressed with both Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn, wants to save Britain; not like he saved Iraq, I hope.

Let’s speak plainly: what we have here is a pissed-off oligarchy keen to temper or ideally reject the will of the majority; a coming together of political cliques and corporate heavies who want to water down the people’s say or at least make us think again and vote again. They join other angry wings of the elite who are agitating to stymie or slow down Brexit: hedge-fund millionaires pursuing court cases against Brexit; shady figures in the House of Lords (when are we getting rid of this abomination?) who want to ‘bring more facts’ to the British people to make them ‘review their decision’, in the words of Baroness King of Bow; the celeb-backed protest movements that openly say, ‘[W]e can help delay Brexit further and ultimately defeat it altogether’.

These are the kind of people who flipped when the Daily Mail called those three Brexit judges ‘enemies of the people’. That was ‘apoplectic vilification’, said Clegg. And yet they spend their time wondering how the people’s idiocy might be tamed. How the ‘madness’ of Brexit, the ‘catastrophe’ of Brexit, the ‘stupidity’ of Brexit might be halted, or at least shaped more by their wise counsel than the public’s low prejudice. What should we call that? How should we refer to the elite disgust for the demos? What words is it acceptable to use to describe this alignment of corporate bosses, cultural players and unelected peers against ‘rule by plebiscite’? Their bristling at the term ‘enemies of the people’ is a case of protesting too much.

Brexit-bashers like Blair and Branson are the real enemies of the people | Coffee House
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
Richard Branson calls for second Brexit referendum based on 'real facts'


Billionaire Richard Branson called for a second referendum "based on real facts" on whether the U.K. should leave the European Union (EU) on Thursday, saying the first vote was done on a "complete false premise".

In an interview with CNBC, the Virgin owner said that Brexit is "one of the saddest things" to happen to Britain and to Europe.

"If a hard Brexit happens it would be pretty devastating and it would be the biggest sort of shot in the foot that the British people have ever done to themselves … (I) hope that sense will prevail and that when all the facts are known and are on the table, I would hope that a second referendum could take place based on real facts and not on the facts that people were given," Branson told CNBC.

"I just pray and hope that when all the facts are there … Then the British people can have the decision to decide because it was a complete false premise that a referendum was brought on in the first place."

video

Richard Branson calls for second Brexit referendum based on 'real facts'
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,418
1,668
113
Richard Branson calls for second Brexit referendum before the result of the first one didn't go the way he wanted it to go
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,418
1,668
113
Brexiters are idiots.

And that's the condescending Remoan attitude which helped to win the referendum for the Brexiteers and why, in the extremely unlikely event of there being another referendum (especially with May to trigger Article 50 on Wednesday), the Brexiteers will just win it again but by an even wider margin.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
I'll have to agree with you for multiple reasons on this one BL
the liebbies here will hate you for that

Certainly for Blair's million death lies about Iraq, he should burn and burn and burn...
then straight to hell without passing GO

As to being like Canada...AWESOME!
just don't go and elect any globalist trudeaus

jeez
so MF supports planetary sized lying murderers eh?
THAT IS WHAT THE LEFT IDOLIZES
interesting

my, how convenient:
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/us-american-politics/134629-935-iraq-war-false-statements.html
very MF like there
 
Last edited:

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,418
1,668
113
I'll have to agree with you for multiple reasons on this one BL
the liebbies here will hate you for that

Certainly for Blair's million death lies about Iraq, he should burn and burn and burn...
then straight to hell without passing GO

As to being like Canada...AWESOME!
just don't go and elect any globalist trudeaus

jeez
so MF supports planetary sized lying murderers eh?
THAT IS WHAT THE LEFT IDOLIZES
interesting

my, how convenient:
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/us-american-politics/134629-935-iraq-war-false-statements.html
very MF like there

You have to laugh at Blair. He says that "only" 52% of people voted for Brexit, as though that makes the result somehow invalid. Yet, even when he was swept to power in 1997 in a massive landslide, ending 18 years of Tory rule, his party only got 43% of the vote, yet I don't recall him saying the election result was invalid and that the election needs to be run again.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,418
1,668
113
I had no idea your were against democratic debate. Did that go out with Brexit as well?

We had a democratic debate on whether or not to leave the EU for several weeks last year - and the people of the United Kingdom and Gibraltar eventually decided by 17,410,742 votes to 16,141,241 votes to leave the European Union. The matter has been decided democratically and, in fact, more British people voted to leave the European Union than have ever voted for anything in history. The government is - as is right and proper in a democracy - now acting out the people's democratic wishes.

Remainers can 'march for Europe' all they like, but they can't trample on the will of the people




Asa Bennett
25 March 2017
The Telegraph
91 Comments


People hold banners during a demonstration against Britain's decision to leave the European Union, in central London, at a protest last July Credit: PAUL HACKETT

The signing of the Treaty of Rome means a lot for the European Union’s great and good, as they are gathered for its 60th anniversary. But few Britons will be bringing out the bunting this weekend.

There are some people do who care, though – so much so that they’re taking to the streets on Saturday to "March for Europe”. The demonstrators certainly aren’t shy in their Europhilia, proclaiming on their website: “We want to remain in the European Union!” Nor are they shy in their ambition, declaring that “Brexit can be stopped”.

Dawn Welsh
@dawnwelsh10
Don't believe any #FakeNews saying the march is off #MarchForEurope is ON! See you there 11am Saturday
https://twitter.com/spaceangel1964/status/844865136741396480 …

8:43 PM - 23 Mar 2017

30 Retweets 24 Likes


Organisers estimate that over 20,000 people could turn up, although attendance will likely be marred by the eleventh-hour confusion over whether the march was actually on. The European Movement told its supporters to stay away, forcing a fellow campaign group, Unite for Europe, to insist it was very much on. Their rift may seem as farcical as the one the Judean People's Front had with the People's Front of Judea, but it won’t stop some people coming out. They will have a speech to enjoy from Liberal Democrats leader Tim Farron, who will tell them that "we can change the direction of our nation".

These protesters may think of themselves as heroic revolutionaries in their guerilla war against Brexit, but they’re more like the Japanese soldiers who kept on fighting after World War Two, refusing to accept that it had ended. They had their chance to make the Remain case, which was defeated by a margin of over 1.5 million votes in last year’s referendum.



They can’t deny this, so instead rationalise their belligerence as part of a longer-term plan to lay the ground for a second referendum. Yet the evidence suggests that they might as well shout into the wind, as public opinion remains sceptical of a second vote.

Remainers won’t convince the public that they understand their concerns by evangelising about the European Union. Even Jean-Claude Juncker admits that it is in a bad way. When the European Commission chief says that the bloc is “not in the best form and shape we could be in”, he is politely summarising its deep struggle to get a grip on the migration crisis and to steady the eurozone.

There is widespread gloom across Europe about the bloc’s future. A poll released yesterday by Ipsos MORI found that nearly six out of ten (57 per cent) of those surveyed across nine member states, including France, Germany, Great Britain and Sweden, that the European Union was on the wrong track. In Belgium, the country that gave us Herman Van Rompuy, the number is even higher - at 69 per cent.

Remainers insist that being part of the EU makes Britain richer and stronger, but many Europeans doubt this. In most of the European countries surveyed, more people think the EU made the effects of the economic crisis in their country worse than think it made it better. The exceptions are Hungary and Poland, both of whom have stayed out of the Eurozone while their citizenry have made extensive use of the bloc’s free movement rules to go and work in more prosperous western states.

Meanwhile, barely a third of people in Italy, Belgium and France (35, 34 and 32 per cent respectively) think that EU member states are stronger in solving global problems together as part of the bloc.

The European Union is not just failing in its aims - it is failing its citizens. Jean-Claude Juncker’s admission that Brexit was a “failure” for the bloc rings true, as it suggests he is all too aware of how his fellow Eurocrats ignored popular concerns about migration and sovereignty in order to further the project.

This project has more than enough problems, yet Remainers are determined to persuade voters that it is time to keep Britain part of it.

By refusing to accept defeat, and insisting they can stop the will of the people, today’s protesters are showing the same contempt for democracy as the European elite.

Remainers can 'march for Europe' all they like, but they can't trample on the will of the people*
 
Last edited: