Theresa May: European human rights laws will no longer apply to British troops

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,402
1,667
113
British soldiers will never again face a legal witch hunt, Theresa May will pledge as she says that European human rights laws will no longer apply on the battlefield.

In a joint announcement with Sir Michael Fallon, the Defence Secretary, the Prime Minister will say that UK troops will be protected from the “industry of vexatious claims that has pursued those who served in previous conflicts”.

Mrs May and Sir Michael will say that in future conflicts Britain will opt out of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), protecting our frontline forces from “spurious” legal claims.

Their intervention is a major victory for soldiers, MPs and senior military figures who have fought against the hounding of troops who served in Iraq and Afghanistan over allegations that date back as long ago as 2003.

Theresa May vows to protect troops from 'legal witch hunt' by opting out of European human rights rules



Theresa May says Britain will opt out of the European Convention on Human Rights to protect frontline forces from 'spurious' legal claims Credit: EPA


Peter Dominiczak, Political Editor
Robert Mendick, Chief Reporter
4 October 2016

British soldiers will never again face a legal witch hunt, Theresa May will pledge as she says that European human rights laws will no longer apply on the battlefield.

In a joint announcement with Sir Michael Fallon, the Defence Secretary, the Prime Minister will say that UK troops will be protected from the “industry of vexatious claims that has pursued those who served in previous conflicts”.

Mrs May and Sir Michael will say that in future conflicts Britain will opt out of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), protecting our frontline forces from “spurious” legal claims.

Their intervention is a major victory for soldiers, MPs and senior military figures who have fought against the hounding of troops who served in Iraq and Afghanistan over allegations that date back as long ago as 2003.

The Telegraph has repeatedly highlighted the plight of British troops facing criminal and civil allegations of abuse in the aftermath of Iraq and Afghanistan.

The claims, in which “victims” used the ECHR to demand millions of pounds in compensation, prompted Sir Michael to describe the treatment of soldiers as a “witch-hunt”.

The Iraq Historic Allegations Team (Ihat) is investigating almost 1,500 allegations of mistreatment and unlawful killing of Iraqis, while a separate inquiry, Operation Northmoor, is looking at more than 550 allegations of abuse in Afghanistan dating back to 2005.

Mrs May told Sky News's Sunrise: "Our troops - our men and women in our armed forces - go out there and put their lives on the line in order to defend us and do things that most people wouldn't be willing to do, in terms of going out and potentially paying the ultimate sacrifice for us.

"I think they should know that Government is on their side. They should have the confidence when they go into combat for us that they are able to do what is necessary to keep us safe and to defend this country.

"What we've seen in recent times is human rights legislation being used to generate all these vexatious claims and troops finding themselves inn some difficulty and worrying and concerned about the future as a result of that.

"I think it's absolutely right that the Government should say to our troops 'We are on your side'.

"Of course, if there are credible allegations of criminal behaviour, those need to be investigated, but we need to stop this industry of vexatious claims which has grown up, with lawyers appearing to chase around to find anybody who will bring a claim against our troops."

Mrs May stressed that UK forces will at all times be required to operate in accordance with international humanitarian law - including the Geneva Conventions - and service law.

As part of Tuesday’s announcement, the Government will set a time limit after which no new cases can be brought.

There are also plans to reduce the financial incentives allowing legal firms to bring cases against British troops on a “no win, no fee” basis.

Mrs May will say: “Our armed forces are the best in the world and the men and women who serve make huge sacrifices to keep us safe.

"My Government will ensure that our troops are recognised for the incredible job they do. Those who serve on the frontline will have our support when they come home.

“We will repay them with gratitude and put an end to the industry of vexatious claims that has pursued those who served in previous conflicts.

“Combined with the biggest defence budget in Europe, the action we are laying out today means we will continue to play our part on the world stage, protecting UK interests across the globe.”

Sir Michael will add: “Our legal system has been abused to level false charges against our troops on an industrial scale. It has caused significant distress to people who risked their lives to protect us, it has cost the taxpayer millions and there is a real risk it will stop our armed forces doing their job.

“This change is an important step towards putting that right – a key commitment the Conservative Party made in last year’s general election.”

He added: “It will help to protect our troops from vexatious claims and ensure they can confidently take difficult decisions on the battlefield.”


Michael Fallon, the Defence Secretary, arrives for the second day of the Conservative Party conference in Birmingham Credit: AFP/Getty Images


Rules governing conflict will in future fall under the Geneva Convention, which allows lethal force as a first resort against enemy combatants. Sources made clear that whether to “derogate” – or opt out – of the ECHR would be made on a case by case basis.

However, there would always be a “presumption” that European human rights laws would not apply to frontline troops in any future conflict.

Since 2004, the MoD has spent more than £100 million on Iraq-related investigations, inquiries and compensation.

Just two law firms have received millions of pounds in bringing claims against the MoD for events in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Lawyers are able to bring “no win, no fee” claims, which allows them to bill extra costs in the event that they win damages for clients.

The law firms that have brought the cases – Leigh Day and Public Interest Lawyers – are both facing disciplinary action by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal over alleged irregularities.

Johnny Mercer, the Conservative MP who is chairing a parliamentary inquiry into the treatment of Afghan and Iraq war veterans, said: “I am delighted with this announcement from the Prime Minister.

“To apply European Human Rights law to combat situations has been a grave abuse of both human rights law and our soldiers whom we have asked to fight on our behalf.”
 
Last edited:

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,402
1,667
113
We've heard months of bitching, whining and moaning from you about who's invading Britain. Scroll back....

That's not true.

No country stands to invade Britain at the moment fore the simple reason that no country on Earth is capable of doing such a thing.

Britain hasn't been invaded since 1066 and it'll likely still not be invaded at any point over the next 1000 years.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,402
1,667
113
Bloody liberals. They can see they are losing the war, especially in Britain.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,402
1,667
113
'Ambulance chasing' law firm that hounded British troops over false claims of Iraq abuse banned from public funding


Phil Shiner, who founded Public Interest Lawyers CREDIT: STEPHEN LOCK

Robert Mendick, chief reporter
Ben Farmer, defence correspondent
2 AUGUST 2016
The Telegraph

A leading human rights law firm accused of hounding British troops over false Iraq abuse claims could be forced to pay back up to £3 million after being stripped of its legal aid funding.

Public Interest Lawyers (PIL) has been barred from receiving public money for ongoing cases after an 18-month investigation by the Legal Aid Agency.

The Government agency said it would now trawl through all historic allegations brought by the law firm to see if fees, understood to total £3 million paid out over the past decade, can be clawed back.

The decision by the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) to revoke its contract with PIL is a massive blow to the firm, which could now be forced to shut down. The law firm, based in Birmingham and London, has levelled more than 1,100 allegations of mistreatment, torture and murder by British troop of Iraqis.


A British soldier falls after apparently being hit by a rock, as British troops move towards a helicopter crash site in Basra, in May 2006 CREDIT: NABIL AL-JURANI/AP

The firm’s founder Phil Shiner currently faces being struck off by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, which is conducting a separate inquiry.Mr Shiner is attempting to keep those hearings secret.

Michael Fallon, the Defence Secretary, who has long accused ‘ambulance-chasing’ lawyers of undermining British troops, said: “We’ve seen our legal system abused to falsely impugn our armed forces. Now justice is being done.”

In a statement released on Tuesday, the LAA said: “We have terminated our contract with Public Interest Lawyers as we consider the firm has breached its contractual requirements. We have taken this action after a thorough review.”

It went on: “We are clear that contractual breaches with LAA’s contract are proven and warrant investigation by the relevant authorities.”

The agency said PIL had “made inappropriate claims” and had “failed to perform contractual work in a satisfactory manner”. It also said that PIL had breached its legal aid contract by “paying referral fees” for cases.


Michael Fallon, Defence Secretary, who has welcomed the Legal Aid Agency decision CREDIT: OLI SCARFFOLI /AFP

A source said the law firm had been found to have paid an Iraqi agent - named as Mazin Younis - who trawled for abuse cases.

The source added: “All the cases will be looked at and if any payments have been made inappropriately the money will have to be repaid.”

The spotlight was turned on Mr Shiner following the conclusion of the £31 million al-Sweady inquiry in 2014 which found that allegations made by PIL’s clients were a product of “deliberate and calculated lies”, fabricated by Iraqis out of malice.

British troops had been accused of massacring innocent Iraqi farmers and torturing prisoners taken at the Battle of Danny Boy in 2004. In fact, the dead Iraqis were insurgents who had ambushed British troops on patrol.

The Ministry of Defence compiled a dossier on PIL as a consequence and reported the law firm to the Solicitors Regulatory Authority. Mr Fallon said the Government was now “working on a package of measures that, alongside this decision, will ensure that” in the future British soldiers are not subject to “unfounded legal claims”.

Elizabeth Truss, the Justice Secretary, welcomed the LAA decision. She said: “Legal aid is designed to support some of the most vulnerable members of society – not to pursue spurious cases against our brave armed forces as they serve this country overseas.

“The investigation by the Solicitors Regulation Authority has unearthed some very serious allegations and it will now be for the relevant authorities to decide whether further investigations are required.

“But I am determined that public money should not be misused or wasted and I will not tolerate any abuse of the legal aid rules that are so vital to the proper functioning of our justice system.”

Supporters of Mr Shiner have insisted his firm is the victim of a political witch hunt. PIL declined to comment at the time of going to press.

'Ambulance chasing' law firm that hounded British troops over false claims of Iraq abuse banned from public funding
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
But why were British troops being hounded in the first place if they were innocent? After all, when has a British soldier ever been guilty of misconduct?
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
That seems to be what is happening - but not for much longer.

I doubt it very much. It costs them a lot of money to accuse any random soldier when they know they can't prove anything. I am sure they have reason to belive that they can win the case before they make a charge.