Refugee Crisis

Tecumsehsbones
-1
#1
Here's a proposal. How bout each country in the EU agree to take in 1/2 of 1% of their population per year for two years, and encourage non-EU countries to do the same? That'd take care of at least 3.5 million over two years.
 
MHz
+1 / -1
#2
. . . how about each person on the globe go to their designated country of origin and they park their *** there and cross borders with only a keyboard?
If Canada is willing to start bombing a place that creates 3M refugees then that is how many she should be taking in. To take in less is to create reservations that are the original death camps the West is famous for
 
EagleSmack
+1
#3
huh?
 
Tecumsehsbones
+3
#4
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

. . . how about each person on the globe go to their designated country of origin and they park their *** there and cross borders with only a keyboard?
If Canada is willing to start bombing a place that creates 3M refugees then that is how many she should be taking in. To take in less is to create reservations that are the original death camps the West is famous for

Always nice to hear from the mental health community.
 
MHz
#5
You like that 'whooshing' sound as things go over your head right?
Your escape from the reservation is mostly an illusion.
 
Tecumsehsbones
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

You like that 'whooshing' sound as things go over your head right?

Take your pills.
 
MHz
#7
It's not me living in an illusion.
 
Locutus
+1
#8
Norman Spector ‏@nspector4 (external - login to view)

Why the US has admitted so few Syrian refugees?



H̶a̶r̶p̶e̶r̶ Obama and Syrian refugees…

 
Blackleaf
#9
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

Here's a proposal. How bout each country in the EU agree to take in 1/2 of 1% of their population per year for two years, and encourage non-EU countries to do the same? That'd take care of at least 3.5 million over two years.


Here's a proposal: Why doesn't America take in some?
 
Glacier
No Party Affiliation
+9
#10  Top Rated Post
Quote: Originally Posted by BlackleafView Post

Here's a proposal: Why doesn't America take in some?

Good question. Here's another one. Where are the Muslims not happy?

They're not happy in Gaza.
They're not happy in Egypt.
They're not happy in Libya.
They're not happy in Morocco.
They're not happy in Iran.
They're not happy in Iraq.
They're not happy in Yemen.
They're not happy in Afghanistan.
They're not happy in Pakistan.
They're not happy in Syria.
They're not happy in Lebanon.
They're not happy in Indonesia.

So, where are they happy?

They're happy in Australia.
They're happy in England.
They're happy in France.
They're happy in Italy.
They're happy in Germany.
They're happy in Sweden.
They're happy in the USA.
They're happy in Norway.

They're happy in almost every country that is not Islamic!
And who do they blame [for their unhappiness]?

Not Islam...not their leadership...not themselves... They blame the countries in which they are HAPPY! And they want to change the countries in which they're happy, to be like the countries they came from, where they were unhappy.
 
Tecumsehsbones
-1
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by GlacierView Post

Good question. Here's another one. Where are the Muslims not happy?

They're not happy in Gaza.
They're not happy in Egypt.
They're not happy in Libya.
They're not happy in Morocco.
They're not happy in Iran.
They're not happy in Iraq.
They're not happy in Yemen.
They're not happy in Afghanistan.
They're not happy in Pakistan.
They're not happy in Syria.
They're not happy in Lebanon.
They're not happy in Indonesia.

So, where are they happy?

They're happy in Australia.
They're happy in England.
They're happy in France.
They're happy in Italy.
They're happy in Germany.
They're happy in Sweden.
They're happy in the USA.
They're happy in Norway.

They're happy in almost every country that is not Islamic!
And who do they blame [for their unhappiness]?

Not Islam...not their leadership...not themselves... They blame the countries in which they are HAPPY! And they want to change the countries in which they're happy, to be like the countries they came from, where they were unhappy.

I await your evidence that all Muslims are the way you say they are.

Otherwise you're just a bigot playing stereotypes.

It is interesting that none of you putative debaters has addressed the question, or has a word to say about the merits or problems of the proposal.
 
Glacier
No Party Affiliation
+3
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

I await your evidence that all Muslims are the way you say they are.

Otherwise you're just a bigot playing stereotypes.

It is interesting that none of you putative debaters has addressed the question, or has a word to say about the merits or problems of the proposal.

First, I never said that all Muslims think that. Read "A God Who Hates" by Syrian born Wafa Sultan to see how a lot of them think. Not all, and probably not a majority, but a lot.

Second, I don't have a big problem with that proposal. It could work, but getting everyone on side could be hard. The other problem is that Syria is losing their best and brightest, and that can't be good for that nation's long term survival.

Third, why are no Arab or Muslim nations stepping up to help? Surely they could step up.
Last edited by Glacier; Sep 4th, 2015 at 12:26 PM..
 
Tecumsehsbones
-1
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by GlacierView Post

First, I never said that all Muslims think that. Read "A God Who Hates" by Syrian born Wafa Sultan to see how a lot of them think. Not all, and probably not a majority, but a lot.

When you don't use limiting or qualifying language, you are speaking of the entire class. Nice try at weaseling out of it, but fail, sorry.

Quote:

Second, I don't have a big problem with that proposal. It could work, but getting everyone on side could be hard. The other problem is that Syria is losing their best and brightest, and that can't be good for that nation's long term survival.

That's an excellent point, and thank you for addressing the proposal.

While I agree with you about the "best and brightest," it's also possible that if they remained they would just be killed by the worst and dimmest. I would certainly encourage, and perhaps require, that they go back when the dust settles some. As you say, Syria will need them.
 
Glacier
No Party Affiliation
+2
#14
The other problem is the doctrine of migration, or Al-Hijrah. One goal of this immigration wave is not to fix the problems in the Middle East, but to bring the Middle East to the west: The Goal of Muslim Immigration According to Muhammad's Teachings (external - login to view)
 
Tecumsehsbones
#15
Yep, the Muzzies're out to get you. Better run and hide.
 
Glacier
No Party Affiliation
+1
#16
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

Yep, the Muzzies're out to get you. Better run and hide.

And you continue to apologize for Islam and Muhammad.

Not all of them, but it does not take a majority to change the culture. 1/2 of 1% is fine. 2% is fine. 20% would not be fine.

httpwwwyoutubecomwatchvRy3NzkAOo3s

 
AnnaG
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

. . . how about each person on the globe go to their designated country of origin and they park their *** there and cross borders with only a keyboard?

I don't think 7+ billion people would fit in southeast Africa easily. That'd be sort of like the Noah's ark issue- how to fit 2 of each of 2 million species (+their food) in a very small space. And what if they do not want to go?
 
SLM
No Party Affiliation
+2
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by AnnaGView Post

I don't think 7+ billion people would fit in southeast Africa easily. That'd be sort of like the Noah's ark issue- how to fit 2 of each of 2 million species (+their food) in a very small space.

It's doable but you have to Tetris pack them in.

Quote:

And what if they do not want to go?

Well then by gawd we fukkin' force them!!

 
Cliffy
Free Thinker
+2
#19
 
petros
#20
Luckily refugees over the last few years are highly educated and have experience in the oil industry.
 
AnnaG
#21
Quote: Originally Posted by SLMView Post

It's doable but you have to Tetris pack them in.



Well then by gawd we fukkin' force them!!

haha
 
Tecumsehsbones
#22
Quote: Originally Posted by GlacierView Post

And you continue to apologize for Islam and Muhammad.

What the hell are you talking about?
 
darkbeaver
Republican
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by CliffyView Post

Those were humanitarian bombings though and as such cannot be fairly compared with ordinary bombings and apparently do not qaulify as valid reasons to move to some other country. You will have to brush up on international law Cliffy.
 
Glacier
No Party Affiliation
+2
#24
 
EagleSmack
+3
#25
Quote: Originally Posted by BlackleafView Post

Here's a proposal: Why doesn't America take in some?


Hell No!
 
taxslave
No Party Affiliation
+2
#26
Quote: Originally Posted by petrosView Post

Luckily refugees over the last few years are highly educated and have experience in the oil industry.

Then they should apply like regular immigrants. No queue jumping. Because you voted wrong.
 
EagleSmack
+1
#27
We have our own "migrant" issues.


We can send some to Britain though. You may need a counter balance of migrants because it seems like Jolly Ol' England is about to get another MASSIVE WAVE on immigrants from the ME.
 
selfsame
+1 / -1
#28
Time will come and all of you will race to come to the Muslim countries.
 
DaSleeper
+2
#29
Quote: Originally Posted by selfsameView Post

Time will come and all of you will race to come to the Muslim countries.

 
AnnaG
+3
#30
Quote: Originally Posted by selfsameView Post

Time will come and all of you will race to come to the Muslim countries.

Too hot a climate for me, but thanks.
 
no new posts