Fox anchor apologizes for Muslim comment after UK laughs at him

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Apology for 'Muslim-only Birmingham'

Steven Emerson on Fox News

US terror commentator Steven Emerson was speaking to Fox presenter Jeanine Pirro

An American terrorism commentator speaking on Fox News has been forced to apologise for describing Birmingham as a "Muslim-only city" where non-Muslims "don't go in".

Steven Emerson told the channel that in London "Muslim religious police" beat "anyone who doesn't dress according to Muslim, religious Muslim attire".

He later issued an apology for his "terrible error".

But many on social media have been ridiculing his comments.

One claimed: "Birmingham's refuse collectors are all Bin Laden."

Another tweet said: "As someone born and raised in Birmingham, I must admit there was a pressure to read the Kerrang."

"I was supposed to go to Birmingham last week but I forgot my passport," said one tweet.

'No excuse'

His comments about Birmingham and London led to many reacting on hashtag #FoxNewsFacts.

Some accused him on his own website of "speaking nonsense" and called his claims "utter rubbish".

Emerson, who founded a group called The Investigative Project on Terrorism, was giving his perspective on the terror attacks in France to Fox presenter Jeanine Pirro.

A witness called to testify to at least one Congressional committee, he later apologised and has offered to make a donation to Birmingham Children's Hospital.

"I have clearly made a terrible error for which I am deeply sorry. My comments about Birmingham were totally in error."

He said he would be issuing an apology on his website for "this comment about the beautiful city of Birmingham".

"I do not intend to justify or mitigate my mistake by stating that I had relied on other sources because I should have been much more careful.

"There was no excuse for making this mistake and I owe an apology to every resident of Birmingham."

Apology for 'Muslim-only Birmingham' - BBC News
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,844
93
48
I wonder if any MSNBC commentators will ever apologize or in Sharpton's case pay his taxes.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,600
7,090
113
Washington DC
I wonder if any MSNBC commentators will ever apologize or in Sharpton's case pay his taxes.

Apologise for what? Have they recently said anything so obviously, ridiculously false as to be utterly insane?

That's right up there with "terrorist fist bump," another fine Fox product.
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
I too used quote FOX as the poster boy for stupidity but lately we have a raft
of nonsense from all of them The slickest being the CNN talking about the
woman terrorist being part of the Paris shooting them finding she left the
country at the beginning of January she has a long reach I tell ya
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
Apology for 'Muslim-only Birmingham'

Steven Emerson on Fox News

US terror commentator Steven Emerson was speaking to Fox presenter Jeanine Pirro

An American terrorism commentator speaking on Fox News has been forced to apologise for describing Birmingham as a "Muslim-only city" where non-Muslims "don't go in".

Steven Emerson told the channel that in London "Muslim religious police" beat "anyone who doesn't dress according to Muslim, religious Muslim attire".

He later issued an apology for his "terrible error".

But many on social media have been ridiculing his comments.

One claimed: "Birmingham's refuse collectors are all Bin Laden."

Another tweet said: "As someone born and raised in Birmingham, I must admit there was a pressure to read the Kerrang."

"I was supposed to go to Birmingham last week but I forgot my passport," said one tweet.

'No excuse'

His comments about Birmingham and London led to many reacting on hashtag #FoxNewsFacts.

Some accused him on his own website of "speaking nonsense" and called his claims "utter rubbish".

Emerson, who founded a group called The Investigative Project on Terrorism, was giving his perspective on the terror attacks in France to Fox presenter Jeanine Pirro.

A witness called to testify to at least one Congressional committee, he later apologised and has offered to make a donation to Birmingham Children's Hospital.

"I have clearly made a terrible error for which I am deeply sorry. My comments about Birmingham were totally in error."

He said he would be issuing an apology on his website for "this comment about the beautiful city of Birmingham".

"I do not intend to justify or mitigate my mistake by stating that I had relied on other sources because I should have been much more careful.

"There was no excuse for making this mistake and I owe an apology to every resident of Birmingham."

Apology for 'Muslim-only Birmingham' - BBC News




No Fox anchor made any apology.

What the hell are you on about again kid?

Do you read anything you post? I suspect you're hyperventilating so much in your hurry to quick-post some idiot thread on your anti-fox/neocon/hitler/harper email list that you didn't bother to at least give the first couple of sentences a go.

Let me spell it out for you and you be sure to read just the black parts, real slow like. Don't do any drugs or drink while doing so either m'kay.

The guest on this Fox segment is some loon name of Steven Emerson calling himself a terrorism analyst.

With me so far?

The host of this Fox show is some failed Republican politician named Jeanine Pirro. She's the 'anchor'.

Mr. analyst made the Birmingham comments and ended up apologizing for them. He apologized. The guest on the show, not the Fox anchor as you wish the world and gogglebots to see the title as. Still with me?

Now since you inserted this: "Steven Emerson on Fox News" , because that line is not in your link, you want us to either believe that it was part of the BBC story you referenced or that you actually read the story and bylined a summary for us good folk.

I'll say it's the latter, which means you're full of sh!t.

Your integrity, and stock continues to drop here boy. That's a real shame for someone that used to have half a brain.





Here's what this dude said:




Here's the apology in full:



You may quote me on this as I will be posting this and taking out an ad in a Birmingham paper. I have clearly made a terrible error for which I am deeply sorry. My comments about Birmingham were totally in error. And I am issuing an apology and correction on my website immediately for having made this comment about the beautiful city of Birmingham. I do not intend to justify or mitigate my mistake by stating that I had relied on other sources because I should have been much more careful. There was no excuse for making this mistake and I owe an apology to every resident of Birmingham. I am not going to make any excuses. I made an inexcusable error. And I am obligated to openly acknowledge that mistake.


Steve


PS. I intend to make a donation to a Birmingham charity.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...-says-everyone-in-Birmingham-is-a-Muslim.html




bonus: The thumbs down I gave this was maybe my second in eight years on this board. You're welcome. ;-)
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,412
1,668
113
An American terrorism commentator speaking on Fox News has been forced to apologise for describing Birmingham as a "Muslim-only city" where non-Muslims "don't go in".


That's not Birmingham. That's cities like Leicester and Bradford.....


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psZBaJU_Cvo&feature=player_embedded


..... and towns like Luton. The Left, of course, don't like that Bedfordshire town, because that's a breeding ground for the nasty, baby-eating EDL. Of course, they just ignore the anti-British Muslim marches like the one in the video (and so do the police) that often take place in that Islamic republic.

It's funny how the cops are always suddenly there in droves whenever the EDL turns up though. So you can take part in marches saying how the "British can go to hell" and "British soldiers should burn" but if you were to take part in a march protesting against such Islamic marches you can expect to get your collar felt.



The Islamic sermon that taught me what’s happened to Birmingham

Discovering a parallel culture in my old home town



James Delingpole
Follow @JamesDelingpole
8 November 2014
The Spectator

204 Comments



Birmingham has changed a bit since I grew up there in the 1970s. Back then, the stories of the hour were the usual industrial unrest at Longbridge, the IRA bombs in the Tavern in the Town and the Mulberry Bush, and the ongoing success of local lads Slade, Wizzard and ELO. Today, though, it’s mainly stuff like Operation Trojan Horse, and I barely recognise the place or the culture at all.

So when, driving back from the Conservative Party conference the other week, I found the radio button that normally takes me to Radio 4 mysteriously tuning instead to a local Islamic station, I thought I’d do a bit of homework and listen to the sermon it was playing. I’d never heard an Islamic sermon before. Nor probably have you. But if you want to understand what’s been happening in inner-city Britain these last few decades, I recommend you do. It will give you an insight as to why there’s a parallel culture developing which has little or no interest in integrating with the one most of the rest of us inhabit.

You know how, in C of E sermons, the vicar is at pains to make his sermons as locally relevant and as secular as possible? Well, Islamic sermons are the exact opposite of that. Though this one had been recorded in a Cape Town mosque it could have come from anywhere in the ummah, from Islamabad to Jeddah to Luton. The preacher would illustrate his points by regularly breaking into fluent, chanted excerpts from the Koran or the Hadith, and he spoke with the absolute conviction of a man who is relaying directly the word of God to the ignorant masses.

His theme was ‘Din’: the correct way in which all good Muslims should live their lives. Whether you are rich or poor, the preacher told us, it is imperative that you should accept your lot because this is what Allah intended for you. There is no point grumbling that the rich are undeserving because, unlike Allah, you do not have the full information. The preacher explained that Allah chose them to be rich for a reason, which we lack the divine wisdom to understand.

As I listened to this uncompromising message, two thoughts struck me. The first was: ‘Is it any wonder that Islamic countries perform so poorly in the economic league tables when their religious leaders seek to destroy the single quality most likely to encourage economic growth: aspiration?’


Birmingham is the UK's second-biggest city and its council is Europe's biggest unitary authority

And the second was: how desperately pre-medieval it was. At the time, by coincidence, I’d been stuck into the 12th-century chapter of Ian Mortimer’s excellent new history book Centuries of Change, and been reading about Peter Abelard.

Abelard is best remembered today as the monk who was barbarously castrated as a punishment for having impregnated Heloise, the niece of one of his fellow canons at Notre Dame cathedral. But his most lasting influence was as the rock-star intellectual who kicked off the medieval renaissance by questioning the absolute authority of the church and effectively inventing secular inquiry and rationalism.

He did so in his book Sic et Non (Yes and No), in which, as Mortimer explains, Abelard examined 158 apparent contradictions in the writings of the Church Fathers, directly challenging the biblical dictum that ‘without faith, there is no understanding’. At the time this bordered on heresy, especially when he proposed that the counter to the proposition that ‘God can know everything’ is the possibility that God does not know everything. This suggested to those of an open mind that if God is not omnipotent, neither are the churchmen, kings and princes who claim to rule with His absolute authority. It was thus the first step on the road to the Enlightenment. As Abelard put it: ‘Doubt leads to inquiry and inquiry leads to truth.’

Much more had to happen before we would get where we are today. Another major development was the widespread availability of vernacular Bibles by the 16th century which meant that, for the first time, an increasingly literate population had access to the word of God without the intervention of a priest. Compare and contrast with the teachings of the Koran which, even in the 21st century, are still largely mediated by specialist, Arabic-speaking imams, the majority of them these days schooled in the purist Deobandi and Wahhabi traditions. If this is the version of Islam that most Muslims are taught is the correct one, is it any wonder they choose not to integrate with kuffar whose ways are haram?

I know I’m not the first person to point out that the problem with Islam is that it’s a seventh-century religion which still carries on as though the subsequent 1,400 years of intellectual development never happened. But though we’re most of us aware of the theory, we clearly haven’t given much thought to the practical implications because if we did, we wouldn’t be so shocked and surprised by the existence of schemes like Operation Trojan Horse and the parallel sharia courts springing up all over Britain.

Of course it seems quite wrong to us, schooled as we are in the values of western liberalism and in concepts like equality before the law. But suppose you believe with the adamantine conviction imparted by your friendly local Islamist cleric that Wahhabist/Deobandi Islam is the one true way and that all others are vile heresies, well you’d be doing exactly what our Muslim communities are doing now, would you not?

This article first appeared in the print edition of The Spectator magazine, dated 8 November 2014


The Islamic sermon that taught me what’s happened to Birmingham » The Spectator
 
Last edited:

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
probably his secondary that slipped through the cracks...just don't have the energy to check that sh!t out anymore. :lol:
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Please allow me to oh so humbly apologize for confusing Fox Commentator with Fox Anchor. What with the sterling reputation that Fox news has for objective reporting, I just don't know how I could possibly have made such a mistake.

By contrast, it's nice to see you actually care about accuracy once and a while Loc.
 
Last edited:

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,665
113
Northern Ontario,
Just maybe Fox wasn't completely wrong?

World Unites in France but Hide from NO GO ZONES in their midst



World Unites in France but Hide from No Go Zones in their midst

The people of the world are rallying in Paris against radical Islam. Over 1 million people are marching around Paris chanting "We Are Charlie" in many different languages.

While the show of solidarity is impressive and a good start, CNN is parading the usual liberal talking heads in support of "moderate Muslims" while hiding the recent stories of Muslims firebombing German and Belgium publishers who reprinted the Charlie Hebdo cartoons in solidarity.

Meanwhile, French President Francois Hollande and world leaders, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas, led a mammoth procession through Paris, careful to avoid the NO GO ZONES.



Increased Muslim immigration to Europe has created small areas which are essentially countries within countries which European law enforcement officials have dubbed “No-Go Zones.”

What is a NO GO ZONE? They are places where Muslims isolate themselves from their host society in Islamist mini-states. And they're growing...



A backdrop to the massacre in Paris on Wednesday by self-professed al Qaeda terrorists is that city officials have increasingly ceded control of heavily Muslim neighborhoods to Islamists, block by block.

France has Europe’s largest population of Muslims, some of whom talk openly of ruling the country one day and casting aside Western legal systems for harsh, Islam-based Shariah law.

“The situation is out of control, and it is not reversible,” said Soeren Kern, an analyst at the Gatestone Institute and author of annual reports on the “Islamization of France.”

“Islam is a permanent part of France now. It is not going away,” Mr. Kern said. “I think the future looks very bleak. The problem is a lot of these younger-generation Muslims are not integrating into French society. Although they are French citizens, they don’t really have a future in French society. They feel very alienated from France. This is why radical Islam is so attractive because it gives them a sense of meaning in their life.”



But non-Muslim ‘no-entry’ zones have been multiplying all over Europe, and even popping up in cities in the U.S. This should heighten every American’s awareness of the imminent danger they face as a nation. Once established, these Muslim enclaves are unsafe, and proving deadly for non-Muslims to inhabit or even to walk through the neighborhood.



Parts of the UK have already become ‘no-go’ areas for police because minority communities are operating their own justice systems. But CNN and most of the media is not interested in telling us the truth about these terrorist breeding grounds hiding in plain sight.

Honor killings, domestic violence, sexual abuse of children and female genital mutilations are just some of the offenses that are believed to be unreported in some cities and growing at an alarming rate.



It starts off innocently enough with them wanting to share a neighborhood with like-minded, religious thinking community dwellers. They slowly grow larger, and incorporate more Muslims into the area, and begin buying up property as fast as it becomes available or leasing it. Then they install their own courts, government, justice and punishment system, Sharia law. At that point threats are aimed at anyone living in the neighborhood that is non-Muslim. These areas have been formed with ‘ethnic cleansing’ harassment tactics; forcing existing residents out of their homes by Muslim provocation and fear of property damage and physical harm. It’s very effective, and the results advantageous to the Muslim community in establishing another ‘no-go Sharia controlled zone.’




They declare it by hanging signs that say: “You are entering a Sharia controlled zone, Islamic rules enforced.” Do not enter unless you are willing to submit to Islamic Sharia law, or risk great personal harm. This is strict Muslim ideology rules, not the rules of the host country or state they are residing in. They are now self-governing in a “voluntary apartheid” by shutting themselves into closed societies and then demanding immunity from our criticism and our courts. And frighteningly enough, they are getting away with it.



If Americans don’t wake up and get their heads out of the sand fast, what’s quickly overtaking Europe will consume the United States as well.

The world may not be "at war" with Islam. But Islam is clearly at war with the world and we are being invaded. One moderate Muslim at a time.

LiveLeak.com - World Unites in France but Hide from NO GO ZONES in their midst
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,412
1,668
113
Just maybe Fox wasn't completely wrong?

That guy was partially right. There ARE Islamic ghettos in many Western European cities, including British ones, which are no-go areas for filthy kuffars, but Birmingham isn't one of them. Most Brummies are Christians, and around 21% are Muzzies.

The REAL Islamic no-go areas are in places like Leicester, Bradford, Blackburn, Tower Hamlets and Luton. These places are just Islamic republics in which "Muslim patrols" ban people from drinking alcohol on the streets.

On last night's Sky News newspaper review, the Daily's Mirror's Kevin Maguire and his politically opposite pal Andrew Pierce of the Daily Mail - the "Odd Couple of Fleet Street" - were saying that this guy is just your typical thick American, and Pierce pointed out that most Americans don't carry passports and have a fairly limited understanding of the wider world outside America (and that female American newsreader he was talking to looked just like your typical American female newsreader, glammed up to the eyeballs and with more makeup than Boots).

What do Americans really think it's like in Britain?


The Fox News claim that Birmingham is a "totally Muslim" city throws new light on the divide between the US and Britain - and reminds us that it's a not-so special relationship after all



Americans still see Britain as the land of peasoupers and gents in bowlers, along with other clichés culled from 'Mary Poppins' Photo: The Kobal Collection

By Toby Young
13 Jan 2015
The Telegraph

883 Comments


I sympathise with the people of Birmingham. It must be galling to discover that so little is known about your hometown in America that a “terrorism expert” can appear on national television and describe it as a “totally Muslim” city where “non-Muslims simply don’t go”. That claim was made on Sunday on Fox News by Steve Emerson, self-proclaimed terrorism expert and founder of The Investigative Project on Terrorism.

But Brummies can take some comfort from the fact that at least Emerson had heard of their city and knew it was in England. My wife, who lived in New York for a year in her twenties, got a blank look when she told the man running the boxing class at her gym that she was from London. “Is that in Australia?” he asked.


Birmingham is, amongst other things, the hometown of heavy metallers Black Sabbath

British visitors to America often report how shocked they are to discover how little is know about their country. It’s not that Americans get their facts wrong, although they often do (more about that later). It’s that they rarely think about Britain at all. For the vast majority of Americans, we’re simply not on their radar.

I found this out when I spent a year at Harvard as a Fulbright scholar in the late 80s. I remember being at a drinks party organised by the Government Department to welcome their overseas visitor and thinking it would be a good icebreaker to ask members of the faculty what they thought of “the special relationship”. Without exception, none of them knew what I was talking about – including the professor of international relations at the Kennedy School. “We regard our relationship with all our allies as 'special’,” he said, before turning to a young woman from Belize.

In subsequent conversations with Americans, I would sometimes take the trouble to explain the term, with particular reference to Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. This would produce an indulgent smile, as if I was confessing to a “crush”. If I pressed the point, referring to our two countries’ shared language and values, they became a little wary and I could sense an alarm going off (stalker alert, stalker alert…). I’m sure President Obama had a similar reaction when David Cameron boasted that he calls him “bro”. I daresay he calls the man who polishes his shoes every morning “bro” as well, but he has the good sense not to read too much into it.

Insofar as Americans think of our country at all, it is the Britain of George the Third and the Boston Tea Party (although when The Madness of George III was released in America, it had to be renamed The Madness of King George so cinema-goers wouldn’t think it was a sequel). This was brought home to me in 1995 when I went back to the States to work for Vanity Fair. I happened to fly into JFK on July 4th – Independence Day – and the famous Manhattan skyline was lit up by fireworks. I turned to my fellow passenger, a gentleman called Bryce, and told him that news of my arrival must have reached my hosts in advance.

“It’s true what they say,” I joked, gesturing towards the fireworks. “You really are a welcoming people.”

“Doncha know what’s happening here?” he said. “We’re celebrating the fact that we got rid of you people.”

Rather than regard Britain as an important strategic partner, most Americans think of us as their former masters – and it’s as if they threw off the yoke of Hanoverian oppression last week, not 239 years ago. The average American regards himself as a plucky little underdog and to buttress that self-image it’s important to keep the country’s colonial past alive. That explains why Brits are so often cast as villains in Hollywood films. Having said that, I once asked the actor Alan Rickman about this – he played the baddie in Die Hard – and he had a different explanation. “It’s because we can act, dear boy,” he said.


Alan Rickman playing the baddie in 'Die Hard' (Rex)

Those Britons who conform to the colonial governor stereotype are much more likely to succeed in America – and not just on the West Coast. During the five years I spent in New York, I came across far more British aristocrats than I ever have in London, and even those limeys from humble stock often behaved as if they were first cousins of Marie Antoinette. (I remember going to a fancy dress party hosted by Kate Moss and being surprised to discover an army of dwarves running around. It turned out she’d come to the party as Snow White and hired the dwarves to complement her costume.)

The alternative was to behave like a stage cockney from the Dick Van Dyke tradition, and, almost as common as faux aristocrats, were public schoolboys talking in a London “street” slang that doesn’t exist outside Guy Ritchie films. During my time in New York, I came across dozens of these types, nearly all of them working for large investment banks on Wall Street. They’d figured out that the key to success across the pond is to conform to an Upstairs Downstairs view of Britain in which you’re either at the top or the bottom of the social pyramid. If you were somewhere in the middle, like me, Americans simply couldn’t work you out. Graydon Carter, the editor of Vanity Fair, once told me I was like a British person born in New Jersey - that is, ordinary rather than a pantomime Brit from central casting.

One mistake I repeatedly made was to correct Americans’ misunderstandings about “the old country”. For instance, I always bridled when members of the American media referred to the Times as “the Times of London”. They just took it for granted that because their Times had “New York” in its title, ours had “London”. Not surprisingly, they weren’t at all grateful when I pointed this out, any more than they were when I said no one other than Americans referred to Tony Blair as “Prime Minister Blair”. My friend Chris Ayres, then the Times’s LA correspondent, took a much more sensible approach. He had business cards printed with “the Times of London” embossed on them in large, black letters.


A businessman wearing a bowler hat and reading the Financial Times (Rex)

Not to say that the impression most Brits have of the States is any more accurate, in spite of our stalker-like obsession. One common mistake is to assume that America is a more “classless” society than ours. Not true if you look at the data on social mobility. If you’re born in the bottom income decile in the United States, your chances of ending up in the top decile are lower than they are in the United Kingdom. Far from being the land of opportunity, America is second from bottom in the social mobility league table, just above Brazil.

We also have a distorted view of just how libertarian America is. When asked about polygamy in a 2008 survey, 58 per cent of Britons thought it was legal in some parts of the USA. In fact, polygamy is illegal in all 50 American states, including Utah. By the same token, 31 per cent of Britons in the same survey thought Americans are not entitled to emergency medical care if they haven’t paid their insurance premiums. In fact, all Americans have a legal right to emergency treatment – and that pre-dates the introduction of Obamacare.


A man guiding a London bus through thick fog with a flaming torch during the 1952 Great Smog of London (Getty)

The other thing to say in defence of Americans’ distorted view of Britain is that it isn’t always a million miles from the truth. The terrorism expert who described Birmingham as a no-go area for non-Muslims was quick to apologise, but he could have pointed out that there are several parts of the city where whites fear for their safety at night – a finding of a 2009 report for the Department for Communities and Local Government. Not long ago, Christians from all over the country held a rally in Birmingham after a West Midlands Police Community Support Officer told two locals that preaching the Gospel in the Muslim-dominated Alum Rock area was a “hate crime” and they risked being beaten up if they continued.

I returned to New York in 2008 to be a judge on a food reality show and abandoned any attempt to buck the stereotype. Instead, I played the part of a cad straight out of Downton Abbey and was named “Reality Villain of the Year” by the New York Post. If there are any Muslim Brummies heading to America, I advise them to make a B-line for Fox News, where they can explain how they turned their city into an IS-style caliphate. They’ll soon be on their way to Hollywood.


Birmingham facts




Birmingham is the UK's second-biggest city.

In Anglo-Saxon, Birmingham means home (ham) of the people (ing) of the tribal leader Birm or Beorma.

The city has more miles of canals than Venice.

Birmingham's first canal was opened in 1769 and linked Birmingham to Wednesbury. There are many locks on the canals including the famous Guillotine Lock in Kings Norton, which was used to control the flow of water between canals owned by different companies.



Birmingham is home to Cadbury's Chocolate. George and his brother Richard Cadbury moved their successful chocolate manufacturing business from Bull Street, Birmingham to Bournville in 1879.

Built as part of The ICC in 1991, Symphony Hall is the home of the City of Birmingham Symphony Orchestra.

Victoria Square hosts one of the largest fountains in Europe, with a flow of 3,000 gallons per minute. It is officially known as 'The River'.



Bingley Hall, the world's first exhibition hall, opened in 1850 on the site now occupied by The ICC

Alec Issigonis was one of the most colourful car designers of modern times. He went on to design the world famous, Birmingham- made 'Mini', which started production in 1959 at Longbridge, Birmingham and is still in production today.

Birmingham is home to the historic Bull Ring - site of a market for more than 800 years. Within the complex are five retail markets attracting around 20 million customers a year.



Two miles from Birmingham city centre is one of the biggest motorway junctions in Europe: Gravelly Hill Interchange, known as 'Spaghetti Junction' to millions of motorists.


Spaghetti Junction

Soho House is the elegant home of industrial pioneer Matthew Boulton, who lived there from 1766 to 1809. Boulton, in partnership with James Watt, developed and patented the steam engine at the nearby but now demolished Soho Factory.

William Murdock, who worked for Boulton and Watt at Soho in the Handsworth area of Birmingham, invented gas lighting. His cottage at Soho Foundry was the first domestic building in the world to be lit by gas (1798 ).

James Watt, who lived in Birmingham 1775-1819, developed the steam engine. Through it, the firm Boulton and Watt sold the industrial revolution to the world. Watt also invented the letter copying machine, forerunner of the photocopier. His name stays in our vocabulary through the lightbulb measurement - 60 Watts, 40 Watts, etc.

X-Ray photography for medical purposes was pioneered by Major John Hall Edwards; he took the world's first x-ray in Birmingham in 1896.

Curzon Street Station, Digbeth, Birmingham, was the terminus of the London and Birmingham Railway, with a station built by Philip Hardwick in 1838, who designed the original Euston Station in London, too.

Birmingham's twin cities include Chicago (USA), Frankfurt (Germany), Johannesburg (South Africa), Leipzig (Germany), Lyon (France) and Milan (Italy).

Birmingham's Centenary Square is made up of more than half a million individual bricks - all hand laid!








http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/11340482/What-do-Americans-really-think-its-like-in-Britain.html
 
Last edited:

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
Please allow me to oh so humbly apologize for confusing Fox Commentator with Fox Anchor. What with the sterling reputation that Fox news has for objective reporting, I just don't know how I could possibly have made such a mistake.

By contrast, it's nice to see you actually care about accuracy once and a while Loc.

Busted in a lie.

Not surprising... the facts rarely support your stories.